Profile: 63f1576a...

My brother in Christ. Every war is a central banks' war. Putin is part of his own country's complex.

It's OK to admit you're wrong Peter. Nobody's going to be angry with you. Please,let's just end the warmongering. The whole affair only served the deepstate and the military-industrial complex. Russians and Ukrainians have no reason to hate each other. Just stop the killing.

Buying and selling is the nerve of human life that sustains the universe. By means of buying and selling the world is united, joining distant lands and nations, people of different languages, laws and ways of life. If it were not for these contracts, some would lack the goods that others have in abundance and they would not be able to share the goods that they have in excess with those countries where they are scarce.

- BartolomĂŠ de Albornoz (1519 - 1573)

#notthedarkages

And they rather enslave their children's children to the same lives than to look reality in the face.

The fact that you (dear normie) can't imagine an alternative system working better than a current one does not prove that an alternative is not possible nor that the current system is worth perserving.

But, for some reason, it is considered crazy to talk about letting people find their own solutions? How is contining down a path of self destruction, because "it's what we have always done", not a completely deranged idea?

I did read it all Guy. I just wanted to post the meme as a reply because I thought it was funny how you structured the note.

Having made some research, I am convinced the "success" of vaccines can mainly be attributed to indoor plumbing and better hygiene in general. Of course, we should also not forget the marketing departments of the producers. And lastly the government itself.

I absolutely do and try to add what i took away as the important parts of the articles at the end when i have time.

I initially started the podcast as something for my own sake to help me have an outlet to motivate myself to learn more and read more. I assumed that if I had a need 4 something of this nature because as you said nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcjgxv3n was Pivotal in my journey through Bitcoin. So I also believed that there were individuals out there who had a desire to dive deeper into the philosophy of freedom itself as I couldn't understand how I had reached the age that I have and had never heard of any of these topics before ever talked about by anyone.

So I had connected with a couple of my local people and ran the idea by them and they thought that me recording them and publishing them for others to consume was a good idea I had no prior podcasting experience before but I definitely am learning as I go but I am trying my best to deliver Something that at least other people can take away something valuable from the articles that I find that Are very thought-provoking and very freedom oriented into trying to tear down the indoctrination that a lot of us have concerning government's existence the morality of good and evil, does free will exist etc.

So I've been doing the podcast for a little over a year now and I don't see myself stopping but it's hard for me to commit doing more than one episode a week and even that is a hard press for me as I work 6 days a week and I'm a father as well so juggling family time and time for myself to sit down and read and record further people isn't always the top of my priority list.

That's completely understandable. The intellectual journey your describing is almost identical to what I experienced over the past decade or so. I went from a "democracy is the pinnacle of human existence" npc to ... well, whatever is in direct opposition to that. Hoppe and Rothbard were the most eye-opening reads for me. Realizing just how much I was indoctrinated and how deep the programming went helped burn away so much of what I believed to be part of my personality.

All that to say that I think it's cool that you find a way to work through this. Good on you.

I'm about a quarter way through the latest episode.

You're doing good as far as the reading is concerned. You're voice is also good.

Where do you see the podcast going?

Have you thought about adding something of your own to the stuff you're reading (like a TK CtV's take at the end?). Like what Guy Swan does.

I'd say our freedoms are already taken and we have to win them back.

Government has already won and we are just waking up to the reality that no matter how well a constitution or bill of rights is written, it is still just a "piece of paper" and ultimately means nothing. Same is the case with any legislation. In the end it will be misused, mistreated and forgotten. No government can resist that.

I am also not silent. I try to point out the ridiculousness of democracy and other types of collectivism any chance I get. I would also go further and say that trying to change legislation by further legislation or political activism actually means that one agrees with, and participates in the current system of government.

I never consented with any system of government nor do I participate in it. I know I cannot vote myself out of it.

The only way out is building alternative systems and solutions.

That is what #Bitcoin is. That is also what #Nostr is.

Building systems outside of the influence of politics is the only way out of this.

The EU will disolve itself quite naturally. The more stringent the controls the more pressure will be exerted on the individual nation states by their inhabitants. The edges might come apart first. Or maybe the Germans decide to come back to their senses.

I admire your vigor Lyudmila. But it is not possible to reform or vote oneself out of a tyranny.

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

Why I think the idea of “superintelligence” and “AGI” is HEAVILY exaggerated or misunderstood:

Assuming we have Ai much smarter than the average human, smarter than the typical PhD (granted smart and “PhD” are not at all equal but for the sake of simplicity). If (or when) this occurs, this will not mean Ai will just be able to invent whatever we need or make all decisions better than anyone else. And I think all we have to do is look at humans to make this simple assessment —

• If we asked a physicist and a biologist what was the most important thing to focus our time and resources on, do you suspect the physicist would find something related to physics and the biologist would find something biological?

This points to the question of speciality. What an Ai is trained on will determine what and how it values things, and there is no amount of information that will make it perfect and forever aligned with the truth at all times. It will always have a weight toward something, because the question of WHAT to value for training and for dedicating resources is present at all stages. It presupposes that we already have the answer if we assume Ai will just magically come up with it.

• in addition, the answer to “where should we devote resources” isn’t static. It changes year to year, month to month, even minute to minute sometimes. It is a question of value and judgement. The only way to sort out this relationship is through trade and competition, denoting the **necessity** of Ai that compete and exchange data and resources.

• General intelligence is useful, but extremely inefficient. Generalists are great to have for combining and relating ideas, but specialists still down into the true details and do the dirty work of real building and fine tuning of the world. Specialization isn’t just an economic phenomenon, it’s a physical reality of the universe. It will be the same with Ai, because Ai doesn’t defy universal laws, it’s just a computer program.

— A giant, trillion dollar cluster AGI will not be as valuable or produce nearly as good results or decision making capability as 10,000 much smaller and specialized AI’s focused on their own corner and trading resources with others to accomplish their task or test the ideas or paths of progress apparent from their vantage point. Nothing in nature resembles the former.

• Intelligence isn’t an omnipotent, unrestricted power. Mental intelligence isn’t the only kind of intelligence. I think as humans we have become deeply arrogant about the fact that we are “so smart” and we have begun to worship our own intelligence in such a way that if we ever imagine something smarter, then it MUST be God and it must be without any limits or flaws at all. Yet there is nothing to suggest this. The “smartest” people today often have the greatest blinders on, and everyone is only as good as the information they have and the values lens through which they see everything.

While the intelligence explosion will be shockingly disruptive and revolutionary in many ways, and while I do see it as an extremely likely outcome in the rather near future, I think the vision of a giant, all powerful AGI dropped on the world like a nuclear bomb is increasingly a projection of our own ignorance and arrogance. It simply doesn’t hold water, imo.

Covered a lot of these ideas in the 31st episode of Ai Unchained:

https://fountain.fm/episode/98UjiXJsa1b2VusbQQur

What happens to AGI when the interest rates come back to reality?