64
Deleted Account
643c10e0f81d7904b5cce2f44b3a36decbf42a7216bef66c4df3e095569ef1c4
Deleted Account

So because you get spam in your email you think it’s a good idea to say fuck it open the flood gates and remove your spam folder completely?******

Replying to Avatar Crizzo

You know what, I'm dropping out of the OP_RETURN debate. I've read good and bad arguments on both sides. I chose a side and argued for it, running my mouth off about things I literally only learned a few days ago like your average internet expert. I think I've learned enough to know now I'm at the bottom of the Dunning-Kruger trough now. I'm cooked.

But I can't leave it at just that, I have to give you my current opinion. I don't think this matters that much. The monetary use of Bitcoin will outcompete anything else because money is the best use case.

After reading the SN thread nostr:nprofile1qqsf2ds69dp2ympzhtpmdd46f3w2cnfkjphtpnaesf5xs8z95vqu2xqpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0a6dhfp linked me (below) it seems that this is mostly about keeping the protocol running smoothly. Node runners want to be gatekeepers to the mempool, but they really can't. There's always going to be a way around any individual node's mempool policy if the transaction is valid according to consensus rules. Creating friction around that is probably not healthy for the network.

I don't want to invite spam, but we've already weathered an extended period of it and Bitcoin is stronger than ever. If this invites another wave of ordinals style bullshit so be it. If it stops other bullshit like embedding data in complex multi sig fake pubkey schemes that might actually be worth the trade off.

Alright, that's it. I need to go touch grass.

https://stacker.news/items/971277

So because you get spam in your email you think it’s a good idea to say fuck it and his open the flood gates and remove your spam folder completely?

From the horses mouth

Replying to Avatar btcttombola

you are both true.

nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgqgzx3h having an open environment allow people to speak publicly and allow some debate. But you can't force anyone to avoid this debate if he wants to mute you or just ignore and don't debate. No tool exists to change this kind of behavior.

npub1vs7ppc8cr4usfdwvut6ykw3kmm9lg2njz6l0vmzd70sf245778zq5d0avw i agree debate is needed here, and to have a real calm interesting exchange of points of view, there is no need to insult the other. Because it just kill the debate, each one thinking "i am true he is wrong".

A true debate means :

- Exchanging arguments in a normal way not need to force anything (i see that point, that problem, because of this and this...)

- Be ready to read and understand the other point if they go against your point just argue again or be ready to accept it.

This should be a reasonable debate, for everyone progress.

If anyone don't respect that, it will just be a fight of ego thinking they are all true and just insulting each other. And i am not pointing one specific man, but each one that don't really want to argue.

You’re right

Well Lameson Lopp is their Banana Boat brother so I doubt they will openly shit on him

It’s not 21 million

It’s 2.1 quadrillion

There will only be 2.1 quadrillion satoshis

90% of people buy Satoshis

Tell that to your banana boat brother .. he thinks of your not a core dev you shouldn’t have an opinion on the matter. I thought you were Mr human rights pro freedom tech good brother? How can you side with Lameson Cock ???

Hey Mr Bitcoin Only .. Mr I’m gonna stack sats about it … Tell your banana boat brother Lameson to fall back