Please be aware that in your first paragraph you repeated a version of a question from my answer and it got more cohesive throughout but right up there that person. Ah, the million dollar question, is a annoyed male that is trying to show fake empathy towards topics that arent what he wants to talk about but rather adds a tantalising and slightly condescending flair to it.. that. Is obviously then open to the listeners or readers interpretation which “shrugs here” can be taken either way. Bordering on gaslighting.
Otherwise the answer is pretty good and brings up good points.
Well done.
What do other men do to help the guy navigate through it and see if he shares the same values and is even anyone that should be around a space where women should feel dafe and not judged.
What do men do to support womens rights.. all guys know how to throw a fit when their children why not throw a fkn fit over this topic already so women know men are still alive.
Hey cyborg have you ever sat in a room with men where they had to watch a woman speak up about womens rights injustice and rape that was roughly around 60 min and afterwards there was not one man that would have been aggravated or said well its not my fault i didnt do it. Have men figured out how to realise that when a woman speaks about an issue thats relevant that no person that speaks on stage or in a room addresses anyone in the audience and if thats what you get from that then the guy should have a therapist to talk to why he would ever feel singled out in a room with more than 100 ppl and no one ever adressed him.
How many know this type of guy, that needs to get shitfaced afterwards.
And no one would care about him if he wouldn’t complain afterwards… So whats the issue there oh wise digitally programmed oracle.
What I realised australian girly is that you gotta know when to dive up again.
Cant be down under all the time even though the bed that they made there lets one forget.
What a tragedy.
I like the last part. Its one of those questions that I have why aren’t countries more proactive and putting sanctions on other countries in regards to womens rights. As in if you dont regulate your behaviour in this area you cannot be treated as a viable part yet.
Sanctions get put on countries for oil but not for stopping abuse against women.
And yes I there is this homo/gay part of history that doesnt get talked about because men are oh so superior to women bc the gay lover before gets it but oh no i had to go back to being hetero sapiens?
The heartbreak for more than one women would probably break the world apart but then again I question the natural existence of the female counterpart or the feminine energy but this goes beyond the plane of biological grasp ability, I think she/that energy, has long left.
Its still crimes against humanity and I dont think the humane part had survived.
It wasnt so much a pondering question but an r u fkn serious question mark. I forgot the exclamation mark.
So pls answer to the real question that is laced in outrage bc its such a lazy cop out.
What were the homo’s who made it driving points to abuse and use violence to keep women submissive?
Survival instincts equal rape? in which part of the brain does this correlate with each other.
A complex pathway of actions and thinking requires an emotional intelligence that is not biological but would cross over the line of the spirit realm..
So what your assumption would be here that the homo who made it was so emotionally complex that he had to go home after a though day out in the wild and let his frustrations of not catching/killing anything out through forcing a woman to have sex/mate with him to release himself from feelings of failure and inadequacy in regards to the imaginary societal pressures that didnt exist yet.
So when real books at school?
I dont see the idea of advanced emotional capabilities as a possibility.
I will add the topic of surpression of the female/women in this regard.
Where in the male brain of the homo habilis/sapiens/theonethatmadeit and yes the distinction at this point is necessary is it rooted to rape women/ to force intercourse even if the women isn’t enjoying it yet, to assert physical violence or agression to assert the male opinion or the pleasure of the male.
So in this regard the ugly truth is that women were their inferior without choice.
How is that advanced empathy and emotional intelligence.
The human species is born from rape/slavery and violence.
If there are actual real pinpoints of childrenbook stories like true love and a god fell in love with humans. 😅 I just cannot. Srsly.
This is all very possible and true but your assumption in this would be that the homo habilis and australopithecus had the intrinsic abilities of empathy and connection to the elements and emotional capacities that would go against pretty much any expression that the human species has shown in regards to living in peace since taking the first step out of the water.
For me that is a romanticised version for storybooks and children that dont need to be confronted with harsh realities but it has to be revisited once the individual has learnt to stomach the gruesome truth of humans and their life threatening flaws.
But back to the actual facts because biology thrives on facts and theres way too much missing in this narrative.
Past present future overlap yes, but that would mean humans are an invention of the future planted in the past.
This is very interesting.
I still struggle with the part about these hierarchies.
Because honestly a structure thats so deeply rooted is impossible to be learnt and retained by the awareness and “intelligence“ level of a version of humans simply living in the survival mode of hunting for food and having to go through trial and error of which berry kills me and which one doesnt.
We’re only in the realm of basic biological history without the spirit part where one takes on the spirit of its enemy after death bc that would require an awareness that is not present through the schoolbook taught way of experiencing the world. In black and white.
So sadly we are still in stepford.. saturation hasnt been added yet.
But back to the hirarchie bc i digressed. There arent enough homo sapiens at the time where these extreme structures in regards to hierarchy would have been conditioned.
I truly think it only goes back to killing bears and beef (but wait how does one kill beef.. a small side joke)
Is a fish really that trained on dry ground to be able to take on lions and bears?
What happend from loosing the fish tail to stepping on sand and suddenly walking upright.
That made the “human” so settled in its conditioning.
Im still not really satisfied with the part of nature and nurture. Since,and this is the assumption that one follows the biological beliefsystem of evolution, where does the water Amphibien and the homo erectus/sapiens brains correlate in Hierarchie.
To be so deeply rooted in the limbic system that a structure like that would be upheld throughout millennias the “nurture” must have been so abusive otherwise the trauma wouldn’t tell itself for thousands and thousands of yrs.
Yes i could see the fight and flight reflex kicking in when it comes to having to fight of an animal but from what has been observed animals only see humans as a threat because they are not able to communicate in the same intricate ways and use all their senses in a way that is cohesive.
Where does pride shame and ego sit in the brain?
Start at the , or maybe and be more detailed about the origins and which part of the brain the need to excerpt dominance over more nature connected species comes from
nostr:npub13wfgha67mdxall3gqp2hlln7tc4s03w4zqhe05v4t7fptpvnsgqs0z4fun what are the psychological reasons to wear shoes made from animal leather.
What is the human trying to express through it.
Duolingo advertises a music option in their software updates for about 6 months now but it doesnt show up in the course options.