DONT THINK
ONLY CIRCLEJERK
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BUT POSITIVITY ALLOWED EVER
SHILLS ONLY
This is the problem with web admins.
They see you as a peasant and don't think they can wrong you.
No amount of calling me a troll will ever make me agree that I am.
Eat a dick with that passive aggressive shit lol.
I am not trolling. You just want me to be because it's a very convenient excuse to ignore me, and because you are categorically unfamiliar with what I am doing: Disagreeing with you.
You posted an opinion about Jack. I countered that opinion. Your only response to that is to go "UGH WHY DO YOU WANT ATTENTION."
The problem here is you and your preconceptions pal. Not me.
You can't just have a guy in the village you don't talk to.
That's how you get turned into soup.
It is your duty if you want to share a public square with me, yeah.
>Why are you always trying to get everyoneâs attention?
Am I doing that?
>By your own standards, this is kind of pathetic, right?
No, I don't think calling a spade a spade is pathetic, and I think you're a faggot for arguing in this way. "Ummm, don't you think what you're doing is baaaad? why are you doing baaaad thing." No, no I don't think it's bad, I think it's good, that's why I'm doing it. Faggot.
Extremely creepy.
Debased.
Nothing I said was trolling. You live in a bubble.
People blaming #[0]â for Twitter donât understand that Jack wasnât really in control of Twitter
"Though its fate is in flux, one thing is clear: A year after he officially took back the reins as CEO, Jack Dorsey has either ceded or lost at least some control over the future of the company he helped create."
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-twitter-dorsey-strategy/?leadSource=uverify%20wall
The fact that he wasn't really in control is his fault.
Anyone who doesn't nauseatingly agree with me is a troll.
It literally is the same. You put them in that void.