No one's getting anywhere because you're refusing to make your case beyond platitudes like just saying the word "vision" with zero context.
Literal beggar.
>Vision
Again, acquire a sense of perspective. It's a website, not a cultural revolution.
>Zapping will allow for creators to be paid for creating, not for catering to advertisers.
In effeect the zappers are just the new advertisers they have to cater to.
Social networks were a 2000s-2010s fad and they will be increasingly less common and more niche until they are just gone.
So freedom from censorship, unless you're boring?
Instead of telling us to "think bigger," think bigger yourself then type those words out. We can't read your mind. Make your own arguments for yourself. Show your work.
>Extrapolate out.
As I have said to ten billion trillion million students (it feels like:)
Show your work.
Unless the non-masses collectively decide never to zap you, and the masses never read something without 500 zaps.
It's a shitty website, not a cultural revolution.
Get a reality check, think smaller and more cynically.
The problem is that you think it's "likeable" content that will be rewarded, as though that's a sig of quality. Banality, uncontroversialness, positive reinforcement, these are the things that will get zaps. That is not a sign of quality, but conformity.
I am a banker. I wish to subvert NOSTR? What do I do?
Easy. Zap a bunch of people to make them my suckups, then start concern trolling "Hey guys I think we need some censorship don't you think?" 500 zaps 500 shares