Avatar
Namcios
66214678009881d6eb836bf90cfe57e8fa9e8abab8c48550a5fcab04f30939ba
@namcios on Twitter
Avatar
Namcios 2y ago 💬 1

Just came back here after watching nostr:npub1lelkh3hhxw9hdwlcpk6q9t0xt9f7yze0y0nxazvzqjmre3p98x3sthkvyz ‘s video. PV 🤙

Replying to Avatar BUB

His situation is very serious. Don't like to see it soiled with NFT bois trying to make a buck.

Fuck Bitcoin Magazine.
Avatar
Namcios 2y ago 💬 1

You have no idea what you’re talking about. So many assumptions. Get the mag and read it

Replying to Avatar Namcios

DM me on Twitter, let’s coordinate BM coverage 🤙
Avatar
Namcios 2y ago

Or email if you’re not using Twitter anymore - namcios@btcmedia.org

Replying to Avatar Mike Brock

TBD is going to have a big announcement tomorrow ...
Avatar
Namcios 2y ago 💬 1

DM me on Twitter, let’s coordinate BM coverage 🤙

Replying to Change this if you want

Happy birthday to me 🫣
Avatar
Namcios 2y ago

Happy birthday man!!

Replying to Avatar ExFrog

This is the way I understand it (not an expert) :

Default - assume valid is on, all data including segwit is downloaded, but only validates blocks above assume valid block height.

If a node stores the data, but never validates it and assumes a huge chunk of it is valid, is it a full node? Fully archival node? Partially trusted fully archival node?
Avatar
Namcios 2y ago

I think with assumevalid you still validate most of it, just not scripts & signatures?

Load More