Just ran two days in a row. Hard to make time. But I think I need it. Go get em.

Well, I hope a lot of people believe that selfishly.

So your web of trust overlaps with people you generally disagree with? Or what do you mean by your web of trust?

Perhaps you could make a new specific comment event called “context” or “aside” which basically starts a a sub thread on a given event about the context of that comment, as opposed to continuing the in line conversation. This could be used as a community note, or any other type of context appropriately.

But I believe the power of community notes is that those who don’t normally agree, this time agree. That prevents the power of the mob from simple majority rule or “”democracy. Also, community notes members have a vetting/waiting period. To reduce and prevent bots. How will you implement that type of protection against bots? Would people need to have made a certain number of posts and likes and comments before they can use this particular up vote or down vote reaction?

Here are two takes

https://nostrcheck.me/media/134743ca8ad0203b3657c20a6869e64f160ce48ae6388dc1f5ca67f346019ee7/79ae7b651cab23ad41458b0fe5c1e7f3bc46712a376befc0b73dcaeb21383b22.webp

https://nostrcheck.me/media/134743ca8ad0203b3657c20a6869e64f160ce48ae6388dc1f5ca67f346019ee7/f07b32c01d8325fc6d6c23ba1c2f19d06ee55289a555188bf8bdcf0b6f7970a0.webp

Yeah I think focus setting was fighting when busy at work to silence personal profile calls and work profile calls.

Then call it the tree of knowledge? And it’s branching instead of forking?

Ai rotten tomatoes for Wiki and journalistic enterprise? Maybe combine that with community notes from X and end up with an interesting project. Partner with internet archive to stamp important events into history before they are edited back out ?

What’s the WoT approach as opposed to consensus?

Had some of that happening. Found a work profile fighting with a personal profile. Once each device only had one profile it helped clear a bunch of it up. Not fully but better.

Oh!! Like blue check verified. Thanks!

For a pleb what does this do?

Now that I see the UHC Change hack I can see why this is more relevant to this moment in time.

Yeah other folks were working on AI smart contract tools 5 years ago. Digest, digitize and compare contracts to see how far afield the outside party added indemnity clause is vs the in house preferred language. All that jazz. Not much will be protected soon it seems.

Thanks.

You might need to zap drs then too for lost revenue due to Pharma kickbacks

Ok so it’s provider to patient securely in the patient channel without going through the data collection pipeline of the big health conglomerate

Tell me why this is so awesome and game changing?

So does this mean there was a point in time when the gov did not collect and catalog every email? And this is new information? Or it’s just new to us and they already know?

If it’s new previously not obtainable public info for the gov to use. Is it possible a gov actor who had communications with Satish was one of the first to start publishing those coms. In the hopes to start a trend of others disclosing their coms also. So they can now rebuild that network and zero in on who Satish actually is?

Could be just unfolding the history. Or could be part of a plan.

So it’s not a nuclear winter to fear now. It’s a digital summer of “never ending heat” from all the “energy hogs”