Avatar
AJ Nobody ⚑🏴
682558c5521ffd22a91a12e256dc9084997f7cb4b05c4985aa9a5c5ebfa011f2
Keep calm and stack Sats. Bitcoin only. Don't trust (even me), verify. This is the way. Schadenfreude commentator. Meme apprentice with no guild affiliation.

Tell me about your sailboat.

I'm still shopping, and I'd love to hear about yours.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to chase them off to shitcoin land.

But the hubris of a few.

Opinions of folks that don't code are not invalidated. That's genetic fallacy.

And humble ignorance seeking to understand is scoffed at.

Some devs: "that's just how it is, now we all have to live with it."

Same devs: "why are you standing ignorantly in obstinate defiance of my favorite BIP?"

Yeah. The tradeoffs is a grander phrase I've borrowed from Thomas Sowell. Evergreen in multiple disciplines.

But bug fix is a good characterization. 🀝

-Reasons why many of us drag our feet on new BIPs.

-Reasons to make sure our fix isn't worse than the problem.

I'm fine with technical if we take our time, and address the correct problem. (BRC-20, not jpegs. Though I have no love for the jpegs either.)

Let me be clear: I still think ordinal inscriptions are stupid, on all levels.

But there's a couple of folks I don't target, because they were artists that used a digital medium before the NFT and ordinal craze.

More importantly, the problem isn't jpegs - it's BRC-20 shitcoins.

Bitcoin is nearly 34 million πŸŒ½πŸš€

(Argentine Pesos 😐)

Adam gives voice to a concern I was having:

"Doesn't this put me on the minority side of an eventual fork?"

I can't always articulate things well, but with great power comes great responsibility. Just because we CAN do something, doesn't mean that's the something we SHOULD do.

ALL code solutions must be considered very carefully.

There are no solutions, only tradeoffs.

Code solutions often come with unintended consequences.

"just wait for the pump guys! As soon as the discount becomes a premium I'll pay you the money. See? I've got these IOUs right here, that's practically as good as money"

There's a similar line in the Hobbit, which I find myself diving into again.

(Audiobook at the moment.)

Merry Christmas to my frens that celebrate. πŸŽ„

My humble two sats on the ordinal-relayed fee situation:

nostr:naddr1qqxnzdesxv6rxdp3xumr2wpcqgsxsf2cc4fpllfz4ydp9cjkmjggfxtl0j6tqhzfsk4f5hz7h7sprusrqsqqqa28tgqgr4

Replying to Avatar DefiantDandelion

Here is the link that is in the image β€œT-mobile Code of Conduct” I’m not going to get in a fight with anyone over this but I think they way everyone is interpreting this is probably wrong.

https://www.t-mobile.com/support/public-files/attachments/T-Mobile%20Code%20of%20Conduct.pdf

Everything in the document reads as if it applies only to β€œnon-consumer” messaging campaigns. Skimming it sounds like it applies to services from marketers or other or automated interactive campaigns like when people are instructed to text β€œmusic” to 242567. And people have to send β€œSTOP” to get them off out of the chain. It appears to be a code of conduct for those kinds of interactions where T mobile would fine entities if they do not follow those guidelines designed to give their customers a expected pleasant interaction and avoid consumers labeling that activity as spam. It does not appear to be directed at individuals talking to each other over SMS or the internet. But that’s just my read.

Your link says 2020 terms.

The screenshot I saw was referring to 2024.

But I came to read yours because:

Don't trust; verify. 🀝