I think that state getting involved in other people's security just causes more inequality, especially when done from higher levels. Smaller communities can have better solutions.

Of course, we must have a balance in this case, but I just wanted to throw in that maximum freedom does not mean minimum security, but I do believe that maximum state security does mean minimum freedoms.

What is security without freedom? Security should enable you to practice your freedom, otherwise security is not security, it is enslavement. "Secure as long as..."

I don't think these things are at the opposite ends of a spectrum.

I just think security is something you must build for yourself and not expect it as a god given right.

You have the freedom to build walls, protect yourself and protect others.

What is security without freedom? Security should enable you to practice your freedom, otherwise security is not security, it is enslavement. "Secure as long as..."