Late response... I couldn't find an old textbook on PC architecture that was written for a business MIS class (still relevant but not as network oriented as you're probably looking for, anyway). I also have a tab open to MIT OpenCourseware (because I'm looking to dig in deeper on discrete math) which may have some more or less practical info. How Stuff Works books seem fairly useful, FWIW. But for this specific topic, websockets and web security, here's how I, a 25 year web professional, understood it:

- Huh never heard of websockets (reminds me of winsock, that's something else)

- Oh I see it's a new protocol, either a replacement of http(s) or it runs over it?

- Seems to emphasize two-way traffic (server can push data) so maybe it's faster

- Chris said it's more secure, but my search response titles seem to lean the other way.

Underlaying those, here's the "intranet infrastructure" knowledge I bring to the game:

- Computers network communications are layered, from wire signals up to app protocols. I don't have all those memorized AT ALL, order or boundaries, but I can tell you about a handful of major protocol types users know from browsers or other clients, I have seen some in packet sniffers that give you a feel for how the data gets represented, I've configured firewalls to all traffic through which helps me understand TCP/UDP streams and initiating (client) versus receiving (server) traffic and how computers map services/communication to ports, I've configured some protocols on servers (mostly HTTP(S) such that I know how to set versions and cipher suites for encryption). I suppose I've seen physical reresentations of electric sugnals and made my own ethernet wires so principles of interference and cuz I'm old I've seen network cards that get installed to change voltage to data... and I've seen DIFFERNT network cards (e.g. token ring) and learned enough without using them to know that there are different ways to control and coordinate communications over the wires.

- I know from reading about HTTP/2, the newer version of HTTP which I had to update (via minor configuration change in a file, no big whoop) in some places that there are SMART PEOPLE(tm) continually thinking about these protocols all the time tweaking handshakes and prefetches and many other things to make them faster and more secure. I just use them, and can do so without knowing any of this, or I can look up RFCs or other details to find out more.

- TLS (Transport Layer Security) provides the S in HTTPS, and it is sort of a wrapper around the HTTP data that gets streamed. It has versions, it can get updated, it can use specific encryptions. I don't know any of those maths but I know there are eyes on these things and newer almost always better.

- Seems like the security of websockets vs https isn't a clear thing from a preliminary search, they both use TLS which seems like a tie... and if it results lean one way it isn't to the new one. This is one of those things that you have to nose around, hear some arguments, put the discussion in the context it was offered, etc.

So, if the root of your question was to sort out if a statement on that security topic was correct, I can tell you as someone who has worked in and near it all -- I would be doing similar things to verify. I might have an edge on verifying some statements but who knows. Let me know if you get any good book/site recomendations.

The murder of crows condemns the murder of crows.

Hey, let us know what is not clear, we're happy to help! (and improve to make things easier and clearer!)

Do you think the state can be trimmed when the average person doesn't have a clue what its true extent is?

The NSA, CIA, FBI, these are all the state, they are too complex to try to reign in by a clueless population. Do you have a different view?

What follows the downfall of the state?

Once you brand something WWIII, you automatically green-light nukes.

The logic being, you can’t have a world war without nukes.

And the war pigs will use the excuse of a world war as the necessary justification for their deployment.

Just realized a key difference between fiat inflation and bitcoin inflation: the former is uncompensated, but the latter secures the network via proof of work.

In other words, BTC supply inflation is paid back to the network. Fiat inflation is removed from the network.

That’s why BTC is low entropy — over time everything it loses by (slowly) expanding supply is recycled back via the miners as a more secure network.

Fiat is high entropy — over time, insiders pull all the value out of the network and destroy it.

Today, where even horses are not economical for most heavy-bag-movement-use-cases, we find *people* carrying heavy bags long distances.

I think creativity will be the same. Most of what we think of as economically-relevant “creativity” will be replaced, some will remain, and plenty of economically-independent or tangential creativity will keep being done by humans to scratch the human entertainment / inspiration itch, at least insofar as that itch requires that humans be the scratchers. I’d guess this is a smaller percent of the demand for creativity than the romantics think.

/450px-Art_backpacking_kid_hiking_BBaccus_NPS_photo_%2823061005462%29.jpg

Oh boy. Is there an aspect you specifically want more info on? I’m pretty well-versed in protocol-level (90s-teens) internet, but minimally versed in intra- (acks and handshakes and packet flow diagrams) or sub- (seven layer model, layer2 vs layer3 firewalls) -protocol details. If you’re looking for math on how internet routing works it’s very different than, say, TLS cryptography. And the wrong book on either is more likely to be drily technical than societally illuminating.

In many ways computers are designed to black box items “below” your need-to-know also. Principles like “routing around damage” or “information wants to be free” aren’t always technical at all but the implementations are.