naive ... they know they cannot hide so they dont show the onchain data

paper! we don't know if really a btc is bought for the customers

#meme #memestr #nostrmemes #memes 827,873 🤙💜

Proud to present the live #Bitcoin ETF Tracker.

VPNs are another problem. Now they have data on all users who want privacy. If I was government, I would get their logs or even set up my own providers to spy on users

Kind of want to run a damus fedimint and/or LSP and integrate a non-custodial mutiny-like wallet into damus clients.

New Year, new chapter

✅ Resigned from business

✅ Resigned all directorships

✅ Sold down business equity

🤩 Enjoying a sabbatical year with agency and time to

🟧 Read

🟧 Learn

🟧 Teach

🟧 Travel

🟧 Explore

In the context of using bip85 (as above) I'd say it's a pretty good idea. If it's a single signer then it depends how confident you are that the seed phrase is in a secure location where it won't be compromised. Finally, if it's part of a multisig then I would say it's too much complication at that point.

When in doubt, keep it simple to prevent locking yourself out. When using a passphrase, keep a physical copy of it separate from the seed phrase & device so you can refer to it if you need to.

But why can’t the AI just prompt itself?

When moon comes, you’re going to be tempted to sell your #Bitcoin for things like real estate.

Be careful! Under a Bitcoin standard, housing is a depreciating asset. Against hard money, real estate will decrease in value over time.

FEW !!!

Austism was extremely rare / virtually non existent before mandatory childhood vaccines became widespread.

Thankfully, more and more people have been waking up since COVID, as they are looking at the actual data rather than blindly trusting the science

"Yeah the simulation works well until after about 14 billion years some starts exploiting the quatam entanglement bug"

The eternal paradox: #Bitcoin fees are too high to use main-chain, but also too high to open Lightning channels.

The fact the here has never been a single experiment to prove the motion of the Earth means it is a BELIEF. Relativity was theorised because of the failed Michelson-Morley experiment, in order to continue the ridiculous assertion that the earth is moving, or “we must be wrong”.

One doesn’t need relativity for GPS… what are you talking about?

Then they had to come up with two different types of relativity, selectively applying it where the one or other fails to explain some motion or observation. Then came dark matter and dark energy to continue plugging holes in the theory; things that we cannot observe or measure, but they have to exist in order for this religion not to fall apart. If you have any common sense and don’t see how ridiculous that is, you may be part of what could be defined as a religious cult.

Theoretical physics is going no where because it is based on theories that go against all observations and experiments in order to continue pushing those original beliefs and assumptions. I’m not sure what they’re pushing forward in exactly, perhaps spinning their wheels would be more apt. Seriously, there is nothing impressive about dark matter and energy, it’s why so many physicists are distancing themselves from it.😂

Indeed, these theories fail to explain a lot, and it is a not much more than a biased belief because you entirely dismiss theories which are both kinetamically and dynamically equivalent in validity, if not even more so.

A unifying theory of everything would be the holy grail, but it will never be achieved if they continue to ignore the aether.

I laugh about this because I doubt their theories, and I’m certain they are lying about a lot of things.

I don't need a theory to explain dark matter and dark energy, because there is no need for these concepts within the theory of a stationary Earth. It is something made up within the paradigm of a heliocentric model.

I'm at the point where I will offer people $500 paid in BTC to go and debate their positions with contrarians. Only 3 caveats:

1. No ad hominems.

2. No rage-quitting.

3. No fallacious arguments

I have heard almost all of these arguments over hundreds of hours of discussions, so I'm not going to try and do a back-and-forth through text.

If you're confident in your beliefs and want to argue them, I'm sure we can set something up. Otherwise, I am fine with 'agreeing to disagree'.

The fact the here has never been a single experiment to prove the motion of the Earth means it is a BELIEF. Relativity was theorised because of the failed Michelson-Morley experiment, in order to continue the ridiculous assertion that the earth is moving, or “we must be wrong”.

One doesn’t need relativity for GPS… what are you talking about?

Then they had to come up with two different types of relativity, selectively applying it where the one or other fails to explain some motion or observation. Then came dark matter and dark energy to continue plugging holes in the theory; things that we cannot observe or measure, but they have to exist in order for this religion not to fall apart. If you have any common sense and don’t see how ridiculous that is, you may be part of what could be defined as a religious cult.

Theoretical physics is going no where because it is based on theories that go against all observations and experiments in order to continue pushing those original beliefs and assumptions. I’m not sure what they’re pushing forward in exactly, perhaps spinning their wheels would be more apt. Seriously, there is nothing impressive about dark matter and energy, it’s why so many physicists are distancing themselves from it.😂

Indeed, these theories fail to explain a lot, and it is a not much more than a biased belief because you entirely dismiss theories which are both kinetamically and dynamically equivalent in validity, if not even more so.

A unifying theory of everything would be the holy grail, but it will never be achieved if they continue to ignore the aether.

I laugh about this because I doubt their theories, and I’m certain they are lying about a lot of things.