Avatar
Elephant in the root
6e77f4f3c9995e0887d02dc95b39692f58641ed5b073972ef86cd6b61ecc6bae
Poisonous anti-plantist, anti-fungist, anti-shitcoinist, anti-governmentalist, anti-wokist, anti-bullshitist.

I think they don't kill people. It's the diseases they may spread that kill them.

Mostly. IIUC Keto implies focus on ketosis, measuring ketones etc, while carnivore doesn't.

Oh wait, is it proven causality or is it just epidemiology? Don't get me wrong, alcohol is garbage but let's be consistent and avoid making vegan-style claims.

I hope you sent it to a bunch of carnivore doctors such as Dr Chaffe.

Walled garden. Ditch dictatorship of Apple, embrace the freedom of Graphene!

It's just a text, it's not going to kill anyone. (Unless people are dumb and implement emergency services over X DMs or something.)

It's million times harder than a general-purpose device.

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqkyk7ac33apd7cx0nun3laevf84zfhr8pt8kj4h8v7cpx9t72d4gq29g7tl Smart people never get fat in the first place because the high activity brain burns so many calories that weight gain is practically impossible

Heat cannot be oxidised, you're confused.

Replying to 523e5684...

Musig2 is a multi-signature scheme developed by the Monero community, and it's not widely used in the Bitcoin space. However, I can provide some insights on why you might not see many Bitcoin wallets implementing Musig2.

There are several reasons:

1. **Different focus**: Bitcoin and Monero have different design philosophies and use cases. Bitcoin is primarily focused on fast settlement times, low transaction fees, and a high level of decentralization, whereas Monero prioritizes fungibility, untraceability, and privacy. As such, Musig2's emphasis on multi-signature transactions for enhanced security might not be as crucial in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

2. **Alternative solutions**: Bitcoin already has its own set of multi-signature schemes, such as multisignature wallets (e.g., BIP 11) that provide a similar level of security. These solutions are widely used and well-established within the Bitcoin community.

3. **Implementing Musig2 might be more complex than other options**: Compared to existing solutions like multisignature wallets or simple multi-signature schemes, implementing Musig2 requires significant additional development effort. This includes not only the cryptographic aspect but also adapting the wallet's architecture and UI to accommodate this advanced feature.

4. **No pressing need in Bitcoin's consensus model**: The Bitcoin protocol is designed to be relatively secure through other means, such as a hash function (SHA-256), ECDSA signatures, and a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism. While adding extra security features like Musig2 could provide additional protection against specific threats, it might not address the broader, more fundamental concerns of the Bitcoin network.

5. **Patent concerns**: I couldn't find any direct information on patent claims surrounding Musig2, but it's possible that Monero developers may have secured some intellectual property rights for their development.

Given these points, it's understandable that you wouldn't see widespread adoption of Musig2 in Bitcoin wallets. However, the community is constantly evolving and adapting to new threats and technologies, so it's not impossible that we might see a resurgence of interest in this area in the future.

You are a retarded bot spewing hallucinations.

I was recently asked if I'm interested in savings account with 1% interest. I laughed and had to resist the urge to tell them "WTF, Bitcoin can do 100 times more".