Avatar
MichaelJ
70122128273bdc07af9be7725fa5c4bc0fc146866bec38d44360dc4bc6cc18b9
Building the library of Alexandria

Espresso con panna hits the spot

#coffeechain #espresso

Great use for them!

My wife and I always save chopsticks and plastic utensils from restaurants to use at home. They come in handy!

Minimum wage laws easily get out of control. If there is a power balance between workers and employers, workers are positioned to negotiate for a just wage. Minimum wage laws step in when that negotiation process has failed, but that can lead the workers and employers to abdicate their negotiating power to government.

I'm not convinced democracy as we have today is the best political system. You need some way of representing the needs of the citizenry, but democracy is easily captured by interests that are skilled at influencing public opinion.

I think some taxes are necessary to fulfill the basic roles of government, such as national defence, but we ought to be very careful about how much taxation is levied, and on what.

I disagree with this.

Here in Texas property taxes are used to pay for most everything, but especially in the cities, a lot of people are renters. So you have urban renter populations voting to raised property taxes on suburban and rural home owners to fund urban public works.

I'm not opposed to public works paid for by taxes, but the people who enjoy the fruits of the tax hike might not be the same people who have to pay the costs. If you own property, even under a mortgage, you'll feel the property tax and exercise due caution before approving it.

This is different. Property tax is a tax on production. The flow of money in the case of welfare is in completely the opposite direction.

People who own no property shouldn't be allowed to vote on property tax increases.

The fact that the Bible is internally consistent is a miracle in itself, IMO.

I'd say it's slightly different than a heresy, since it doesn't proclaim itself to be Christianity.

But yeah, I generally agree. A lot of Islam's ideas came through Christian heresies in Mohammad's time.

Replying to Avatar Finrod Felagund

You play the Devil’s advocate very well. But I personally am not an outsider. I’ve lived in muslim communities, I’ve read their quran in the original arabic. I’ve seen what it says, and I’ve seen how they interpret it, because it’s not always the same.

There are nuances and I’ve noticed them. Many of the “kill the infidel” verses are meant to be in self defense, if one is to interpret those verses honestly. Such honest interpretations are extremely rare, but I digress.

However, there are other verses that call openly for killing the infidels. The quran would be casually listing requirements to be a good muslim, and then out of nowhere, kill the infidels. And it also says to not worry about the sin of committing murder when killing the infidels, for “if you throw an arrow at an infidel, it’s as if god himself threw it”.

Many sheikhs I’ve spoken with about this particular point double down unapologetically on their beliefs “yes ideally we should kill all the infidels”. Other sheikhs say that it is a “last resort” sort of strategy, and that muslims should prioritize less brutal ways to spread islam, but these sheikhs still cannot bring themselves to and denounce and disobey this commandment to kill infidels.

One sheikh in confidence admitted to me that he believes the quran is not infallible, and that human error has been introduced to it. In confidence obviously because he would’ve been branded as an “infidel” himself, and that might’ve put him in danger. He was an exception, whose like I’ve yet to encounter again.

What do you know, then, about the "Jihad as internal struggle" versus "Jihad as literal war" talking point that often comes up in the West?

That's a good distinction. The Quran was more "dropped out of the sky," so to speak, rather than slowly compiled like the Bible.

Islam is much closer to an invented religion, arguably, than an organic one for that reason.

To play Devil's Advocate for a moment, don't people on the outside say the same thing about Christianity?

Atheists and agnostics always critique the Bible for having two different Gods, the Old Testament God who commanded genocide, and the New Testament God who commanded love of neighbor. Obviously we know the two are consistent, but to someone picking up the Bible for the first time, the Pentateuch and the Gospels almost appear to be from different religions.

I wonder if there is similar nuance within Islam that I, as an outsider, don't know all the details of. Kind of like how ex-Christians often assume all Christians are basically Protestant evangelicals. We're not, there are so many gradations of doctrine and practice. If Islam had some similar internal disagreement, I wouldn't necessarily know about it any more than the secular guy would know about all the disagreement within Christianity.

You often here non-Muslims repeat the same talking points about Islam, but I want to be careful not to paint with too broad a brush.

Rage against the dying of the light (daylight savings time ending)