Dis have subtext?

How do you square this with not being able to trust anyone with anything, because some assholes decide to fuck everything up?

Situational awareness is cute, but if you have to treat everyone like a silent assassin, then your 'situational awareness' will not be able to cope.

It seems like there is a hidden factor here that is an assumption of reasonability.

And in the right direction 😋

I did another pass of searches. Not all of them do. Some use kerosene. So in that respect, you are right there is fossil fuel burning.

I can't speak for the sound. Obviously the rocket isn't silent. The propulsion might not be as bad as you think. I think they're powered by methane and oxygen, which are (composed off) quite common elements. I'm not sure if that exact rocket, but I remember hearing/reading about this as one of novel construction choices.

I'm also curious. You react quite strongly. Is it because of chemicals causing the effect? Is it about the light it produces? Is there a loud sound involved? (This seems most reasonable.)

I'm not always inspirational. Sometimes I'm just pissed off.

Didn't it get quite a bit of negative vibe? Like the original spirit got lost. I thought i heard about things getting worse last few years. I never been; just going off rumors.

This meme could use a bit more "Hawk Tuah".

Learn what?

Is he still collecting, or did someone explain?

Generate a key and think up a vanity? 😅😋

Okay, I'm probably being stupid here, but shouldn't the peace sign be upside-down?

STFU of you don't know what you're talking about.

I have no strong opinion about communism either way. I don't know that much about it.

However, I'm fairly sure that communism takes control over a particular concern of morality: the equal treatment. (And prly "treatment" is an inaccurately chosen word, but you get my drift.) And then it only seems to work (well) in theory.

Does this mean we're back to unisex toilets?

Actually, my brain was still putting things in order, and basically I could've also pointed out: religion claims to be *the* authority, dismissing all other sources. ...etc...

Ah, that's what bugs me. The point is, different systems approach things, such as morality, differently. Religion claims to have the answer, but also (often) claims that it is needed for this answer, i.e. "if not for religion where would you get your x", e.g. morals. (And I don't feel like looking up and listing outdated/immoral practices that are prescribed.) It takes an ownership and authority based on false claims.

But the thing is, you also mention for yourself now that you think about it and adapt it for yourself. So the morality is there, but also not in a reliable/immutable form, such that it requires adaptation. And how it's adapted changes per person. Adaptations, even to the point that things aren't even supposed to be taken literally.

What are you making?

I switch to 'religion' as term when I move away from specifically Christianity, so we agree on that.

Not all goals are the same for all forms of control.