> If you give up your own discernment to any system you are at its mercy.
That said, something can be learnt from all you just need to be the filter on your own morality and perspwctives.
Sorry, but that's not how it works. Christianity claims to be the source of morality; followers claim that if you don't believe "then why would you stop yourself from doing bad things". If your own filter comes first then what's religion's role?
There are plenty of bad actions taken *in name of religion*. If these people preferred morality over their religion, this wouldn't happen.
Sure, humans are fallible, but the point is to use intelligence to come to a sensible ideas based on morality, values, principles. Religion claims independent positive events for their own, rejects negative events in name of religion, turns a blind eye, has questionable values and cripples human's ability to think critically. That shouldn't be the basis.
One could say that the religious had their chance and they blew it by being a bunch of abusive liars. Religion will always be opportunistic and parasitic in nature.
The only positive examples I know of people that have a religious belief, are those that use their own intelligence primarily and belief in some religion secondarily. And I think religion ultimately holds those people back.
I get so tired of the bullshit accusations. By now you should be able to connect the dots. But .. then again .. bad expectations are on me, I guess.
Oh, this is terrible .. I'm laughing at the picture, but it's my own boost from a while ago. 😋😂
Let me try to be even clearer: I know that those comments are targeted. It's obvious. What I don't know, is what you're basing all the comments on. What value system? What "expected behavior"? What disposition?
I have 5 years of persistent continuous attacks over things I never did wrong. People are clearly interfering. I have no clue on why any of it is necessary, or productive in any way. It seems to me like a lot of pointless bullshit.
So, enlighten me.
And don't give me the "great people talk about ideas" excuse, because there have been 15 years of prior abuse and attacks that I did not deserve. There is no reason why I would not be allowed to correct obvious lies.
Seriously, what are you fucking talking about. Trading what? I keep hearing the bullshit accusations, but I get none of the bullshit "explanation". What assumptions are you working with? What does it look like from your perspective?
Also, you guys are the only one who constantly pull "money" into the story.
To someone: if that's your conclusion, then that's one hell of a stupid shallow superficial view on the situation.
Dark matter are vampires 😆
How do you all expect to make a point if you act all superior in every way but then make up arbitrary, non-sensicle rules and then lie about events.
Like .. am I supposed to feel inferior just because someone is telling lies? To the point that I have to read from these kinds of reactions that some imbecils are spreading lies again?
How does this magically make me a worse person?
Another aspect to consider is whether victim is aware of all abusive practices. Some things happen behind person's back, or happened in the past, or happens somewhere with no access. Concrete information is key.
Well, any one user can choose to block the account, right? However, if you and I and everyone else installs the same nsec, it's not as obvious anymore who made what comment.
Being held responsible would require tracing back what connection submitted what nostr note to the relay. Not technically impossible, but the npub does not identify exactly 1 person, as it does with personal accounts.
Hmmm.. I don't know. Maybe. My thoughts arrived at "utter chaos". I guess what you're saying could happen. I'm not sure if there's anything left to read into if one account voices any possible user. It would probably feel like an unmoderated guest account.
I just realized this works in 2 ways:
- 'duck' to warn to lower your head, and
- 'quack' if you forgot to lower your head.
