How so? I'm confused what this is based on now. At this point it doesn't even land as an attack, though I strongly suspect it's targeted.
If this is supposed to be targeted. We seem to be having a different view of circumstances.
Wrong picture. EU was encroaching on Russia, against old agreements with Russia.
What beast is that? What makes you say that? As much as I suspect it's targeted, as little it makes sense.
Ask if she's interested in some casual slaughtering of my enemies before I pay for the thank-you dinner.
Or where all the smart and capable people go. Makes you wonder if the stairway to heaven is even finished.
Well, I clearly have something to read up upon to understand this statement. 😅
I'd rather you share eth! 😆
Are you targeting someone specific? If so, can you state the original claim? Are you sure you aren't being deceived?
I think this is supposed to be a targeted comment, but I don't understand it.
Okay. Red fot images without a checksim is kind of confusing, I'd say. Red for bad checksums seems justified as you also give information when you tap on it. (iirc)
I'd propose smth like '?' but it would have to be noticable in some way.
Hey nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqpzamhxue69uhhv6t5daezumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcscpyug just a thought, not urgent or anything: a marker for images without checksum, as an indication that there is no way to know for sure.
Not sure if this is too common such that it becomes an annoyance, but the *lack of* a marker is more easily overlooked (or forgotten about) than an unexpected marker.
