The problem with social (sorry, nostr doesn't fix this) is that we can't explore nuance. My interpretation of OP's observation is that there's something unnatural about the discrepancy of wealth between a billionaire and a pleb. Yet comments go right to Marxist.
Dude had a great mullet. https://m.primal.net/QDHN.webp
That's exactly what I got out of the original post.
Yeah it is bullshit not surprising though. Look what they did to them with lockdowns that was also some serious bullshit. I am also surprised I spent a decent amount of time there (over 1 yr) in Queensland and NSW am surprised they seemed more freedom oriented back then but that was 15+ years ago.
I hated Trudeau with passion! But I believe Carney is somehow much worse he was the one telling Trudeau what to do and I believe he is even more eager to take away Canadian's freedom and sell out Canada to China and the WEF. He's a sick fuck
It was my take away from this (I may be completely wrong) that Sai was not saying production=extraction. I thought the example of the Italian textile owner was showing the opposite that production (and wealth generation) is easily possible without extraction. That reasonable pay for reasonable work everyone is better off. While most if not all billionaires are created through taking advantage of laws and regulations (that cuase unequal pay for work/productivity) created by those in power that are getting money/kickbacks directly from said billionaires, and not created through true free markets. Like I said that was my take away from it maybe I am completely off base.
Wtf that's scary
what is "***" .... maybe even just a more obvious hint if you can't say it
GM oh yum that looks good
GM Happy hump day
I mean it's got to be too good to be true but what's the harm
I mean it's gotta be too good to be true but I see no harm






