I'm not so sure I can if it involves a bunch nonsensical arguments in support of a bunch of shitcoins.

What projects are you referring to?

Well, we can use Lightning, I suppose.

You can Coinjoin.

You can Coinjoin.

Well, we can use Lightning, I suppose.

Yes, but we can choose to treat money as fungible. It's a decision we can make.

Dollar bills also carry an ID and bank accounts can be frozen. As soon as you start IDing individual bits of a currency, the worth of that currency declines and everyone holding it is poorer.

Quantum computing could pose a threat to the traditional encryption methods used in blockchain. This is due to the unique properties of quantum bits, or qubits, which can provide high computational power for solving certain tasks.

Traditional cryptographic methods, like RSA and ECC (public-key algorithms), rely on the complexity of factoring large numbers. Quantum computers, using Shor's algorithm, can significantly speed up the factorization process, meaning that some cryptographic systems could be compromised much faster than with traditional computers.

To counter the threat of quantum computing in blockchain cryptography, researchers are working on developing quantum-resistant encryption. Quantum-resistant cryptographic systems use methods that are challenging for quantum computers to break, ensuring the security of data transmission in the era of advancing quantum technologies.

However, it's currently more of a theoretical concern, as creating a fully functional quantum computer capable of breaking modern cryptographic methods remains a complex task requiring substantial technical research and development.

#QuantumComputing #BlockchainSecurity #QuantumThreat #Cryptography #CryptoFuture #QuantumResistant #Encryption #TechResearch #DataSecurity #BlockchainTech

Bitcoin will be listed in STOCK EXCHANGE fiat casino soon for first time !!! dam it took 15years for that - applications are submitted/rejected since 2013 #plebchain world largest casino NYSE wallst flash boyz HFT liftoff

This is getting cool tbh.

The internet didn't change. The people did. We voted with our attention. Personal curation was given up for convenience of having things curated for us. The joy of finding cool content disappeared because it's just found for us.

It's as if people forgot that life is a journey, not a destination. The things you do along the way are what matters and not where you go.

We forgot his lesson with the internet and opted in for feed-it-to-my-glazed-over-brain system, bypassing all of the joys of discovery.

Entertainment hits diminishing returns the more you consume. You can't watch Netflix for days, your brain will burn out. The same way as you can't scroll Twitter for days, you'll start feeling like shit. Same for YouTube and anything else really. Central services that optimize on preference and engagement feed off of humans until they burn out, squeezing them dry in the processes for as much data as possible, to further squeeze others.

AI is not going to fix any of this. If anything, it'll likely get worse. Seeing hyper-personalized content is not going to make anyone any happier. It'll further alienate people from the real connections that make them truly happy - real life connections and activities with people. Personalized feeds that know exactly what you seek will only make it more difficult for people to connect.

Of course, the Zucks of the world will say "we're here to help!" "Here, plug yourself into the metaverse, it's as if it's real!" And... people will take the bait. In some ways it will bring people closer who are far apart. It may forge new virtual relationships that feel real, but will never be real unless people actually meet.

Just my late night rant that I'll probably regret tomorrow, wondering how I could have said such stupid things.

😇

Just buy a distiller and add the minerals you want back in. nostr:note1wsuwpzrntqal2duvc2mgezv6hfz8dlz2e5sh7w7rxqsmyjlfpyuqcw6ry5