Avatar
BTCLonghorn_TexasHodl’Em
733db87ba65b18ed2036511987485c07058de236832d9a1de1765bc78b44fcdb
Know when to hodl’ em
Replying to Avatar hh

One of the important reasons why I think BTC's main value proposition is as a store of value and not as a payment system is that it's simply not needed for that.

I get it -- migrants sending money through Western Union paying fees through their asses. But BTC is not required to fix that.

I use Wise and can transfer instantly between actual bank accounts in different currencies at insignificant cost. I get paid by my US clients by ACH. Instant and free. I switch to my local currency for virtually nothing and transfer to my own Wise and non-Wise accounts for free.

Most important, the transaction costs are fixed and knowable. They don't change depending on whether some prick is minting PepeCumInADogsAss memecoin tokens or China banning BTC mining again.

If the transfer is to another Wise user all I need is their email address and it's also instant.

I have transferred to accounts using ACH, SEPA, whatever it is called in Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, Korea, Chile... and it's instant.

And traditional banks have caught up too. Instant and FREE transfers within the same bank have been a thing for many years now.

Now they're a thing between different banks too, at least where I am. I just paid a bill by instant SEPA to another bank. Instant and free -- under the "legal threshold" of €900 at least.

My point being, Bitcoin does NOT fix this particular thing, because that's just not what it does well.

What it does well is preserving the purchase power of my Argentinian family in a hyperinflationary context, and allowing me to move from country to country carrying (or really, not carrying) all my net worth with me without any predatory State thug being able to shake me down.

The chance may be small that these gatekeepers would refuse to honor your transaction request, but the possibility still exists. I understand today it isn’t necessary from your practical viewpoint. But, preserving the right to transact with another person without a trusted third party is a monumental feature wrapped up in privacy, sovereignty, etc. And, We already have used gold for thousands of years as a store of value. Bitcoin may be better, but again, that feature existed prior to BTC.

Looks like Blackrock has started buying.

So blue wallet lightning LNDHUB sunsetting. If I’m connected to my umbrel node, then I’m good to keep sats in the wallet? Or should I transfer off to be safe?

Apparently, tax rate levied by ancient Roman Empire to fund the armies was 2%.

The feeling never goes away.

(Well, maybe if you’re an OG from 2012 or something you feel like have enough.)

“I don’t have enough bitcoin” meme really starting to take a new meaning for me.

Bankers and politicians capitalizing on the government’s ability to issue new debt and print new money win, or are the ones stealing. Uneducated plebs think the politicians are helping them by giving a little of the new money as handouts/entitlements, so politicians get re-elected. The bankers and other govt contractors (I.e. military) get rich and also kick back to politicians. The average person getting a salary or hourly wage doesn’t get any benefit, but instead is hurt.

Funny how coinbase doesn’t display a price chart for USDC but it does for tether…. 🧐

View on taxing electricity usage for bitcoin mining? Could it possibly be a win for bitcoin because govt would view it as a source of revenue? Benefit greatest number of people, Even those who don’t acknowledge it’s value.

Is this 30% tax legit or just sideshow antics from POTUS to make ESG donors drool?

So this 30% tax bs from WH on electricity. No way that can pass right? Just sideshow from POTUS to make his ESG donors drool a little?