If I try to describe a society without aspiring trillionaires who control the communication systems and throw power around like a sledgehammer and you immediately think “murder” that’s on you dude not me.
Something about the red light
I have no idea what you’re talking about that Press his job is to call what they see. You can’t not report the news because somebody might get mad.
Thanks How about this one https://donmoynihan.substack.com/p/make-america-hungary-again?utm_campaign=post&triedRedirect=true
Many things but probably most of all the fact that the guy in the middle of it is claiming that he’s solved free speech, which is the most 1984 thing we have going outside of the book itself. Which would be one thing if he was a crazy person ranting on the street but there’s millions of people who believe him - that’s the most excruciating part to watch.
In principle, I don’t believe anyone should own or run Twitter. It wants to be a public good at a protocol level, not a company. Solving for the problem of it being a company however, Elon is the singular solution I trust. I trust his mission to extend the light of consciousness.
- nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m
#BitcoinTwitter

Faith of a child, a very very young child
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx-cDMNdFXSUWr9HulQHDSmOaAE4LRoRpe?si=GxxCXUt6NoRUfqgQ
https://www.nytimes.com/1971/10/15/archives/nixons-own-expert-criticizes-cutbacks-in-school-lunches-expert.html nostr:note1c3hev80nhxajh7cknssefvcrjtnqwvlcug09nmgmluzcvtkjjx3qqsqye5
This was addressed in Hubermans podcast with Robert Lustig about 2:13:00 I.
Even if he loses, Ryan Selkis might be ANGRY and sue you for UNJUST TREASON or something. Privacy tools make SLAPPs harder to grind out.
Do you have TAILS on a flash drive?
Assistant to the Regional Hitler
Yeah Bruce Fenton and Ryan Selkis really were playing it close to the vest. Shocked shocked that Elon endorsed him. Who next Nikki Haley?
It was always intended to be a tool for Elon to gaslight people while stirring up chaos. Not broke, functioning as designed.
Elon is trying to dunk on the media for not blurting out “assassination attempt omg” without apologizing for all the misinformation that he amplified. It’s gross. nostr:note133dd49equt0e33gwvalklzn6ejklfszfyc2c5hmxy92lnd29xfhsyxcf0y
I’m gonna have to wait for a few confirmations on that claim
And there are times in the past when journalists have failed to do this and ended up being humiliated, a headline that’s up for 2 minutes that turns out to be wrong will hound them for a long time
100%. I’m not a formally trained journalist but I would imagine that rule number one is, “in the middle of a crazy developing situation, only report what you know”.
It might look obvious from 2000 miles away but when you are at the scene of a crowd where gunfire is happening it is very confusing and everybody’s describing different things happening and so you just report what you can confirm. I’m not really sure what the other motivation would be, like they were going to cover this up or something, I’m not really following the logic there.
Great work on “collective sense making” :
https://www.cip.uw.edu/2023/12/06/rumors-collective-sensemaking-kate-starbird/
For those of you who haven’t witnessed a shooting - it’s not like in the movies; The camera does not pan to the shooter, who pulls the trigger, and we all watch in slow motion and the bullet flies toward the target.
It’s more like, you hear sone unexpected sounds and people just start going apeshit
This is what we knew had happened at the time and this is the way that media reports things; it’s literally their job.
Why is everybody so triggered?



