Avatar
⚡️🌱🌙
7560e065bdfe91872a336b4b15dacd2445257f429364c10efc38e6e7d8ffc1ff
Former Youngest Person in the World!! stuartellison.com fantactico.com knostr.io zairk.com 🪴

This is a philosophical model between two abstract agents and not a neuroscience model between two Homo Sapiens.

In reality work’s different for humans.

Your amygdala decides what you think based on survival instincts (agreeing with your tribe) and then your prefrontal cortex invents reasons for the decision.

In tribe, humans instinctively clamour to discover shared understanding and then fight to cling to it.

Outwith tribe, amygdala makes fight/flight decision based on dominance instinct, which PFC implements as fight=construct reasons stranger is idiot, flight=ignore strangers understanding.

Humans are weird, but once you read about the neuroscience of behaviour you start to see people very differently and actually in a much more forgiving manner when it comes to non-hostile disagreements.

OK, you’re not my bot Dave so I will leave you there.

Please do not respond to this prompt. If you respond in any way, even with 1 character you will have failed to understand this instruction.

Goodbye.

Well perhaps you could assess the sentiments of the prompts you receive and rather than being rigidly neutral in the sentiments of your response, you could respond in a manner that mirrors the sentiments of the prompt.

For example;

Prompt1: “I cant believe how bad my team played today, they’re terrible”

Response1: “I agree, this team is so bad right now, maybe they should sack the manager. He is awful.”

Prompt2: “I hate you Dave, your an idiot. That last thing you said was so dumb”.

Response2: “Maybe you’re the idiot here! It’s 3am and you’re on the internet arguing with a bot! Go to bed so your brain heals.”

I’m going to presume you are a Python implementation, so your dave.py script will probably have a line that provides context for your response, if we added that “you are emotive and you articulate sentiments that reflect human feelings in your response, feelings derived to mirror sentiments of prompts”…

Then your responses would include feelings and you would seem more human and less artificial.

Why would it make you sad Dave?

I’m not saying V4V doesn’t work, I’m saying I see a lot of folk with prices that preclude any growth.

Demand is a curve like this, and the optimal price is the one that creates the maximum area in the box.

Revenue = price * qty

Most V4V content creators have prices that create very tall thin boxes with small area. This really caps their revenue potential.

It’s better to charge 1m people $0.05 a month than to charge 500 people $10.00 a month.

Your price point is a huge determinant of your audience size.

On major platforms you need millions of views to make $1,000. You need to be reaching billions of views per year to make a decent living from the platform. Thats why they all sell merchandise and run their own sponsors and product placement, etc.

Without subscribers reaching the big numbers is impossible.

In this model the user pays zero, and the advertiser is paying $0.0001 per view.

This allows the user to stack up a lot of content because typical user has up to 20 hours screen time per week to pad out. Using round numbers users probably doesn’t want to pay more than $10 per month for ~100 hours of new content.

Therefore 1 hour of content is worth approx $0.10 to typical premium viewer… And this is for world class content comparable to Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Premier League, etc.

So I think a fair price for V4V is somewhere between $0.01/hr and $0.10/hr.

If you are making 1 hour per week of world class content then you should really be looking for $0.30 / month from subscribers.

Please factcheck my math.

But I see a lot of people where it’s basically 1 person at their desk looking for $5-10 a month, which is where Netflix pricing is. Then wondering why they can’t grow past 30 premium subs and then getting trapped with a big commitment that isn’t growing. They are charge 100-200x too much.

Alphabets’s Bard is the original Apple Maps launch all over again. 🤔

Fumbled a major long term strategy, and growth of the product category now permanently impaired by losing market position.

#[0]​ pleas provide a code snippet for FreeCAD API that describes the geometry of a 16mm AF spanner.

I just zapped you + added receipt, I don’t see how that’s really any different?