Profile: 772f9545...

BLS at https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm says they balance out to "no change." All three might be true, e.g. I lost a job and I took another one.

My sense significant qualitative and quantitative differences.

If I recall correctly, and I don't have any sources, any business in China is technically owned by the CCP. A business might operate like it's free and private while it's small, but once it gets big enough, the state really does take it over. In the USA, the businesses are technically owned by the owners. The state might meddle using regulations or national security letters or things like that, but for the present the businesses are still owned and operated by their owners. If somebody has a source confirming or denying this I would appreciate it.

As for the totalitarianism, I think China is only worsted by North Korea, right? This difference with the USA is more about scope. The USA tracks, surveils, imprisons, assassinates, etc., but perhaps the latter two in a less broad manner. It's hard to tell because the USA officially denies doing a lot of that stuff. My sense is that everybody in China knows they operate under such a regime whereas in the USA the state denies it and people don't want to believe it happens here too.

If you look at the measures recommended in the Communist Manifesto's second chapter, it has been argued that most or all of them are present in the USA. So you're right that it's difficult to say "communist" applies to China but not the USA. We have to be more specific.

Indeed. I don't have a Glock in .45 and don't remember any experience with them in .45 but I've heard nothing bad about them. I have heard bad things about 1911s from James Yeager and have seen a couple of them malfunction in easy conditions. I have not seen any Glocks or XDs malfunction in easy conditions. Not that I have seen a lot of either, I'm talking a handful.

Talk to me about the 45acp glocks. I have been a 1911 guy since 1988 when I got my first handgun for high school graduation from my dad. Since then I've been all over the place, but always loved the 45 well because why not?

In most of the 90's it was wheel guns for me, it wasn't until 2008 election of Barry and Michael Obama did I get into the high capacity auto loaders. Had never been a Glock (plastic gun) fan. But I wanted them because I thought for sure they would be banned... Little did we know right?

Anyhow, I got an XD 45 first, then saw the price of 9mm vs 45 and picked up a Glock 17... Still carrying wheel guns on a regular basis. Once I became comfortable with autos I decided to get a Glock 26 (this was before the subcompact craze started) and the 26 was about the only choice.

I'm 100% comfortable carrying 9mm with modern defensive ammo. But.... This is the 45 part...

Ruger just released the PCC 45 (pistol caliber carbine in 45acp)

I've never shot any gun in doors let alone 9mm or 5.56 from an AR, but as an older person with hearing loss I feel it would be very detrimental.

Secondly my wife has trouble with everything, even 380 which is her gun. So I got to thinking of this new Ruger as a home defense gun. It comes with a threaded barrel and since 45 is already subsonic I think would be the perfect home defense rifle??

Bringing it back to Glock... Well this new ruger uses glock 21 mags... I like guns with inter changing mags (my 26 can use glock 15 and 17 mags)

So now I'm thinking we should run 45 acp in glocks across the board. The glock 17 sits in the nightstand, but I could see changing that out to the 21 and get a threaded barrel and suppressor for it and have the Ruger for her with a suppressor. I think she could handle a rifle in 45 pretty good. And then use the glock 30 as a edc, especially since I could use the larger mags as well as a reload like I do currently with the 26.

I know we don't need an excuse to get more guns, but this new setup (PCC + glock 21 + glock 30) sounds bad ass.

#guns #edc #2a #homedefense #pistol #selfdefense

Ruger supports gun control.

Cost: filling a G17 mag is a little cheaper than filling a G21 (currently).

More rounds: a G17 mag has 17, a G21 has 13.

I like to pick a round and then use it across the board. Total cost of ownership is mostly ammo not the firearms. So if you are already in a bunch of 9mm and have little-to-no .45, it probably makes sense to stick with 9mm. If you are already in a bunch of .45 and have little-to-no 9mm, it probably makes sense to stick with .45. Along these lines you might want to get rid of the .380 because it's similar to 9mm but is almost as expensive as .45.

Pistols and/or shotguns are probably fine for home defense. I don't know how one can avoid hearing loss in a home defense situation.

"Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well. For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God. Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king. Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward. For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God." - Peter

Simpler is certainly better. In the case of "me and my one machine" it can naturally be simple. A lot of complexity might be self-inflicted but some of it comes from the natural complexity of "my team and our machines serve many people." If it's "me and my one machine" I might use version control because it's useful to just me, but there isn't strictly a need for it and it would be simpler without it. Likewise I might or might not have a dedicated test machine or an automated build if it's just "me and my one machine." But those latter things start to make more sense once other people are involved.

Command and Control (2016)

Wormwood (2017)

Coup 53 (2019)

"Ergo abolendo rumori Nero subdidit reos et quaesitissimis poenis adfecit quos per flagitia invisos vulgus Christianos appellabat. auctor nominis eius Christus Tiberio imperitante per procuratorem Pontium Pilatum supplicio adfectus erat; repressaque in praesens exitiabilis superstitio rursum erumpebat, non modo per Iudaeam, originem eius mali, sed per urbem etiam quo cuncta undique atrocia aut pudenda confluuunt celebranturque. igitur primum correpti qui fatebantur deinde indicio eorum multitudo ingens haud proinde in crimine incendii quam odio humani generis convicti sunt. et pereuntibus addita ludibria, ut ferarum tergis contecti laniatu canum interirent, aut crucibus adfixi aut flammandi, atque ubi defecisset dies in usum nocturni luminis urerentur. hortos suos ei spectaculo Nero obtulerat et circense ludicrum edebat, habitu aurigae permixtus plebi vel curriculo insistens. unde quamquam adversus sontes et novissima exempla meritos miseratio oriebatur, tamquam non utilitate publica sed in saevitiam unius absumerentur." - Tacitus

Translated to English: "Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man's cruelty, that they were being destroyed." - Tacitus

"Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour. Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." - Paul