Profile: 772f9545...
This is an excellent paper by Ludwig von Mises about the foundational philosophy of phraseology.
https://mises.org/library/book/epistemological-problems-economics
Praxeology, right? I did not even notice the typo at first.
This is an excellent paper by Ludwig von Mises about the foundational philosophy of phraseology.
https://mises.org/library/book/epistemological-problems-economics
Are there any non-excellent papers by Ludwig von Mises?
"So the heralded Reagan Revolution fizzled. In part it failed because the administration never had a strong commitment to fundamental change in the first place. Witness the unyielding support for the massive transfer payments, benefitting mainly the middle class, under the Social Security system; the continued subsides to, bailouts of, and protection from competition for farmers, timber companies, auto, steel, textile, footwear, and apparel producers, shipping companies, commercial banks, and countless others; the pervasive interference in international trade through quotas and so-called orderly marketing agreements negotiated with foreign governments. Virtually the entire hodgepodge, described by Stockman as a 'coast-to-coast patchwork of dependencies, shelters, protections, and redistributions that the nation's politicians had brokered over the decades,' remained intact. Political expediency reigned as supreme as ever. But even had the Reagan partisans genuinely desired to return to a free-market regime, their methods did not augur well for such a reaction. They focused not on institutional change but on altering the budget numbers, on getting income-tax rates down--particularly at the top bracket--and, with much less enthusiasm, on reducing governmental spending. Number juggling is not the stuff of revolution. Ultimately, as Stein has observed, the likelihood of a conservative revolution was slight because 'even conservative governments when in office do not want to limit their own powers.' Conservative politicians, in short, are still politicians. And in a political system devoid of basic constitutional and ideological restraints on the scope of governmental authority, any species of politician may run amok." - Robert Higgs
In any case, I hope it gets better soon.
How about five pillows under your leg lying on your back, kind of like a squat position?
Thanks for sharing.
In most cases, sure. But just like physical laws, natural law can have gray areas requiring specialists. I agree that this doesn't make it arbitrary.
What good is a phone call if you are unable to speak? What good is a Bitcoin if you are unable to spend it?
Median fee around 10-15 USD for the last couple blocks. Good luck buying your five dollar coffee.
Maven and Gradle use $HOME/.m2 and $HOME/.gradle directories. Then again, those are build systems outside the language. Language designers need to remember that people might try to use languages to build stuff and re-use stuff from other folks. So if Go supports reuse in the language, kudos to Go.
I am using gossip 0.11.3 and I see the link to both video and picture in the OP.
It was not always so. See https://emojipedia.org/pistol
"Originally depicted as a classic handgun, as a revolver or other pistol. In 2016, Apple switched its design from weapon to toy; other major vendors followed suit by 2018. Deprecated emoji sets or smaller platforms still display the emoji as a handgun."
In fact, it does not appear to be unicode's error. Look at https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1F300.pdf (Unicode 16) where it describes the emoji in question 1F52B as "PISTOL = handgun, revolver" and furthermore (at least in Firefox's display of the PDF) it looks like a Beretta 92! This is an error of presentation in several implementations, not an error in the spec.
It was not always so. See https://emojipedia.org/pistol
"Originally depicted as a classic handgun, as a revolver or other pistol. In 2016, Apple switched its design from weapon to toy; other major vendors followed suit by 2018. Deprecated emoji sets or smaller platforms still display the emoji as a handgun."
As an idiot, I hope all wallets become idiot-proof. People seem to think it's too burdensome to use gold coins as money. Compared to all the pitfalls of maintaining privacy with Bitcoin, gold's looking pretty good at the moment. At the same time, I want to know how to use Bitcoin the most private way.
Instead of consolidating, what's the better approach? Let Wasabi do another coinjoin with the dust? What about moving to another wallet, what's the better way to do that? Coinjoin followed by sends from each UTXO to new addresses in the new wallet(s)?
The problem with wabisabi coinjoin transactions is that you end up with dust UTXOs and need to consolidate them after coinjoin: https://mempool.space/tx/b893d2f3dccf0b4ce22e572e431b97b7a14fdf00992fbfb344937ba717eec793
Can they not be spent along the way in any given transaction post-coinjoin?
Five years ago this week, SARS-CoV-2 had spread across the globe and an intelligence alert about SARS-CoV-2 was sent across the globe.
106 years ago today, belligerents signed an armistice after around 20 million people had been killed. Meanwhile, a flu spread across the globe.