Researched it myself, it's a repost from an account on X with handle @warintel4u
It's clearly bullshit and a rare misstep from nostr:nprofile1qqsqg6vsvdpkxuuev8f6lf8uyfqadan94ngjfg3lcxy6cuzdwnjdpyspr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0k6kn6z who's usually pretty good in the curation of posts they select to republish here
Which account did you repost this from? Because it smacks of fake news. Iran has immense reservoirs of computer science talent; I strongly doubt they employ many Indians (the Gulf states might).
No, the trait you are describing is intellectual arrogance
(I exhibit it myself sometimes)
Proof of Work matters in the generation of new coins *within* the Bitcoin sysyem (there is no way to generate new coins without doing work) and the contribution of this work is what secures the blockchain and the security of the system.
The work done to generate the coins *does not transfer* outside the system. It makes Bitcoin hard money, yes, and gives it value, but value is not Proof of Work. Proof of Work is an approach *within* a system to make ppl expend computational effort to be able to do something. Ppl spending satoshis to have a relay pass along a message are not doing proof of work, *nor* is it a proxy for PoW (it doesn't transfer), they are simply spending something of value. They are making a payment. They could spend something else instead that can be transacted digitally such as stablecoins or shitcoins (while they still have value). I understand and aporeciate why ppl might not want to integrate either of these into a system and I would sympathise with their thinking but from the technical point of view, any exchange of value is all that is needed. Bitcoin serves because it has value, not because it is a proxy for PoW. That is a nonsense.
Understanding PoW is fundamental to understanding Bitcoin, in a technical sense. We see a lot of nonsense on Bitcoin social media these days with ppl talking about their own personal 'proof of work' when they've worked to do something. Yes, work can be virtuous but real world work and computer science work (computational effort) are two quite different things. The work chosen for the Bitcoin system is set to be deliberately non useful - it doesn't solve any problem useful to the real world.
Perhaps I'm over explaining now, but I remain surprised at yr misunderstanding of how PoW works. It only works within the system in which the rules for what work matters are made. This PoW then, in Bitcoin's case, creates value for the currency generated. For nostr to utilise PoW, clients would have to expend computational effort "within* nostr. They can't use Bitcoin as a PoW proxy because that is a nonsense; literally it makes no sense in computer science terms. You cannot have a 'proxy' for PoW; you must simply do the work required by the system.
Bitcoins do not represent PoW, they represent value generated from a system which, for sound technical purposes, utilises PoW internally.
Where can I find the full transparent records of all monies received by the nostr:nprofile1qqs0rxy6jmt44guxkny8z4pkym9mxckqxfytygxuntjn6l80hj409sgpzfmhxue69uhky6t5wd6xzcmt9eshquqpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzamhxue69uhkxcfwdaexzmn8v4cxjmrv9ejx2asult5ph and the OFF for each financial year dating back to their foundation ?
So I can verify your assertion
I appreciate your concern for this duck but from your description it sounds like you are giving food to wild creatures. This is never a good idea and you are not doing the wild animals any favours by feeding them, quite the reverse.
(I'm allowing Albania direct to Serbia even though the game map doesn't allow it, wanting you to pass through the fictional Kosovo first.)
Man who pretends to study Bitcoin ignores the prominent example set by Satoshi Nakamoto
But it's hard for ppl who have an instinct for constant self-promotion, like Jimmy, to understand the value of anonymity / pseudonymity. It simply does not compute in their narcissistic heads
Yes (although you don't need to go quite as high as the Baltic states). Get a perfect score by naming the minimal number of countries in order to follow the broad path you outline. Requires good knowledge of the countries bordering the Ukraine (as you can't pass through it) but ppl who have followed the war should have mastered these by now.
Btw, last day to play this particular challenge. New challenge will drop tomorrow (Monday)
Bitcoin is code. The people who maintain and add features to the code can be interfered with. Users always have a choice not to run newer implementations of the code but that also requires users understanding Bitcoin well. Understanding has decreased since the last big challenge to the code base in 2017 with the introduction, by evangelistic 'orange pilling' of many shallow, influencer led Bitcoiners. The struggle to keep Bitcoin 'true' is an ongoing one, and also the layers built on top of it. I see nostr:nprofile1qqs9336p4f3sctdrtft2wlqaq5upjz9azpgylhfd3dplwf005mfrr9spzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7spz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kueg6g89xw and the nostr:nprofile1qqs0rxy6jmt44guxkny8z4pkym9mxckqxfytygxuntjn6l80hj409sgpzfmhxue69uhky6t5wd6xzcmt9eshquqpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzamhxue69uhkxcfwdaexzmn8v4cxjmrv9ejx2asult5ph as highly suspect players in the world of Bitcoin developer funding.
Two links from 2013 examining funding links of the nostr:nprofile1qqs0rxy6jmt44guxkny8z4pkym9mxckqxfytygxuntjn6l80hj409sgpzfmhxue69uhky6t5wd6xzcmt9eshquqpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzamhxue69uhkxcfwdaexzmn8v4cxjmrv9ejx2asult5ph and the associated OFF :
https://truthout.org/articles/using-human-rights-for-right-wing-politics/
> The story of the Oslo Freedom Forum is also a story of US right-wing sponsorship, lack of transparency and “heroes of human rights” involved in supporting serious human rights violations.
The truthout article references this earlier 2013 piece by Max Blumenthal :
As for amount of funding provided by Thiel, a BuzzFeed article states it as at least $900,000 to the HRF, but it is BuzzFeed so not sure about the accuracy. Thiel is also acknowledged on the OFF website as a founding funder (separate to his funding of the HRF) and organiser of the initial conference.
Not enough scrutiny of the HRF/OFf, its backers and its funding sources has been done since those early 2013 articles I linked above.
The Blumenthal piece puts Thiel's finding of the nostr:nprofile1qqs0rxy6jmt44guxkny8z4pkym9mxckqxfytygxuntjn6l80hj409sgpzfmhxue69uhky6t5wd6xzcmt9eshquqpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzamhxue69uhkxcfwdaexzmn8v4cxjmrv9ejx2asult5ph at $535,000 so you may prefer to use that figure over the higher BuzzFeed figure
Happily I have no idea what you're talking about but most talk about so-called AI is idiotic, beginning with the stupid name for what is much better described as Machine Learning
Two links from 2013 examining funding links of the nostr:nprofile1qqs0rxy6jmt44guxkny8z4pkym9mxckqxfytygxuntjn6l80hj409sgpzfmhxue69uhky6t5wd6xzcmt9eshquqpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzamhxue69uhkxcfwdaexzmn8v4cxjmrv9ejx2asult5ph and the associated OFF :
https://truthout.org/articles/using-human-rights-for-right-wing-politics/
> The story of the Oslo Freedom Forum is also a story of US right-wing sponsorship, lack of transparency and “heroes of human rights” involved in supporting serious human rights violations.
The truthout article references this earlier 2013 piece by Max Blumenthal :
As for amount of funding provided by Thiel, a BuzzFeed article states it as at least $900,000 to the HRF, but it is BuzzFeed so not sure about the accuracy. Thiel is also acknowledged on the OFF website as a founding funder (separate to his funding of the HRF) and organiser of the initial conference.
Not enough scrutiny of the HRF/OFf, its backers and its funding sources has been done since those early 2013 articles I linked above.
Have you owned and/or used one ?
That's all you can respond ?
I don't mean to get too personal but it's concerning that someone in your professional position can hold and express such a foundational misunderstanding of what Proof of Work is and, more importantly here, what it isn't.
Good for you but what is your point ? Bitcoin worked as designed, as uncensorable money. This is regardless of whether the truckers rights were being respected or not. Bitcoin doesn't know and doesn't care.
What do you have to say about Peter Thiel's foundational role in the nostr:nprofile1qqs0rxy6jmt44guxkny8z4pkym9mxckqxfytygxuntjn6l80hj409sgpzfmhxue69uhky6t5wd6xzcmt9eshquqpzamhxue69uhkxcfwdaexzmn8v4cxjmrv9ejx2ashehydu ? That's something I'd be interested in listening to.
My BPI keynote
"Bitcoin is the Most Important Human Rights Technology of the 21st Century"
Delivered in the heart of DC
Please share with normies who don't think Bitcoin has a use case. We have A LOT of work to do, most people think this way
But we WILL win in the end
https://blossom.primal.net/fbb5c8d98220ae2e323045c9ff199f02637f06f2e735be972df592bc9999259a.mp4
The conflation of Bitcoin with human rights is stupid.
Bitcoin is a technology. It doesn't care what 'rights' it is granted or not. The whole point of Bitcoin is that it routes around censorship.
p.s. it should always be noted when nostr:nprofile1qqs9336p4f3sctdrtft2wlqaq5upjz9azpgylhfd3dplwf005mfrr9spzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7spz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wct4lwjj starts spouting talk about human rights that he is highly selective in whose rights he wants to promote, and that these suspiciously co-align with ppl agitating for régime change in governments not controlled by the North Atlantic oligarchies
Ideologues are tedious
This account is run by an obvious networker and wannabe influencer
But why I'm commenting is that nostr:nprofile1qqsxc56ajk5xtxerf4dqspgrfa0s5elrcr80lnz9nasldq87j3zzf0cc5h4hk reposted this fawning post. And his account stream is full of such reposts. Which makes his account not worth following, because whatever insight there is in his book is not found in his stream.
There's nothing to agree /disagree with here; it's stupidity and people who push / promote it are idpol idiots
No, it's super dumb and inimical to the idea of Bitcoin.
Being a Bitcoiner is not a ready made identity you put on.
Prague is often referred to as 'The #Bitcoin Capital of the World.' But do you know the reason behind this title? The new free e-book, 'From Defenestrations to Bitcoin - A 600-Year Fight for Freedom,' reveals the story. Grab your personal copy here: https://pages.btcprague.com/download-free-e-book-from-defenestrations-to-bitcoin-pp
Meet the world’s leading community at Europe’s biggest finance summit for digital #gold bugs, June 19 - 21 2025at nostr:nprofile1qqsd0f68dvf98gvs9am9dp0lu0f4r7xzu2k89rm9tt448axf5tu6wlgphpy4c. Get 10% off with code 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸𝗦𝗶𝘁𝗵
𝗯𝘁𝗰 🟠⚫️🟠⚫️🟠
𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗴𝘂𝗲
Have never once heard this 'Bitcoin capital of he world ' claim before today and I find it very dumb. (Bitcoin is decentralised.)



