Subnostr

You're not making sense. Upvotes and downvotes on wikifreedia are attestations, if you're using them to "build attestations" it sounds like you're doing something wrong. Like using houses to build a house.

Replying to

Do they need much?

Maybe if you're Kanye or something. But the vast majority of people don't need to worry about a global audience. And if they do, they'll be able to deal with that "problem"

Strange that you're acting like you're not familiar with the internet

When the people with the infrastructure don't host content for the people without infrastructure, the people without infrastructure don't have a voice

See also: old school TV and radio

This is another thing I'm amazed at how it's hard for you to wrap your head around

If you're going to run relays that don't host my content then please make sure first you have assassinated the president or taken other actions to protect me from the FCC and allow me to have similar infrastructure on equal footing with you as a fellow member of our democracy so we can have more of the talking kind of democracy and less of the shooting kind

Replying to

You assign trust/influence/value-to-you to accounts along contexts - not just "about the person" (which I agree is a problem in the bad version of WoT).

So you are ultimately scoring their content. If I assign low trust to Laeserin on the "economics" context but high on "religion", then when she writes content on those two topics, it will be filtered (for ME, not anyone else) accordingly.

Now, if you attest about me on these two topics, my view of Laeserin will slightly influence your view of Laeserin (only on these topics), along with your own view of her and others you've attested about.

The process is entirely voluntary and reputation flows from you. Nobody else can influence your graph if you don't trust them to. There is no global state of influence.

We've discussed this before, what you're describing is useless because it's relying on blanket judgements of entire people which most human brains aren't good at during a population crash. You need to rely mainly on judgments of individual pieces of content. Likes and reports exist. Don't know why this is so hard for you people to wrap your heads around

Replying to

You assign trust/influence/value-to-you to accounts along contexts - not just "about the person" (which I agree is a problem in the bad version of WoT).

So you are ultimately scoring their content. If I assign low trust to Laeserin on the "economics" context but high on "religion", then when she writes content on those two topics, it will be filtered (for ME, not anyone else) accordingly.

Now, if you attest about me on these two topics, my view of Laeserin will slightly influence your view of Laeserin (only on these topics), along with your own view of her and others you've attested about.

The process is entirely voluntary and reputation flows from you. Nobody else can influence your graph if you don't trust them to. There is no global state of influence.

Replying to

🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit

Guessing it must be wiki articles the client is seeing but not reading

https://wikifreedia.xyz

Except I do see what looks like a wiki article that is reading at the top of the screenshot 🧐 odd, maybe the blank ones are old versions I replaced with edits

Replying to

Against Social Media

empty, just your profile

Guessing it must be wiki articles the client is seeing but not reading

https://wikifreedia.xyz

Replying to

Saberhagen The Nameless

You don't take advantage of "amounts in the clear" to verify the billion+ txns anyway. No Bitcoiner does. You just run a node and pay no mind like any Monero user would.

I fail to see your advantage if you never do it in practice.

"Can, but doesn't" is essentially the same thing as "Can't"

It's larping

Not sure where you're getting this stuff but no, what you're saying is not correct.

Replying to

Saberhagen The Nameless

You got better things to do...that's why you're replying to anons on Nostr for the past few days but can't skim a brief introduction on commitments for a couple minutes. Suuuuure lol.

No one is upset. You didn't address anything else I said because you cant.

If you can't click a link that's your own willful ignorance. I really don't care if you do or don't.

You just got very confused very quickly. Sorry about your brain issues, good luck.

Replying to

ODELL

JULY 25TH.

NASHVILLE, TN.

JOIN US.

https://pubkey.bar/rhr

There's a pandemic. Stop being dumb

Replying to

Here's a way to think about this: suppose it _were_ true that "all people have natural talents" - what are some mechanisms that would be at work that insure that fact is always true for everyone? if you can't think of how that would work, that's a strike against the hypothesis, no?

The whole development process up to birth. If your DNA is too dysfunctional, you don't make the cut. Even the lowest human has qualified to live as a human.

Replying to

You might be right. But go there with me: why is it not reasonable for users to host their own content?

Most users don't have much infrastructure

Replying to

Subjective influence systems when properly implemented work by looking at who _you_ think is valuable, and helping you judge, filter and discover content as a result. That works perfectly well when one is anonymous.

It's only if you want to be perceived as a valuable curation node / trust provider to _others_ would you need to be not-anonymous.

Toxic model. It should be about differences in value of content, moreso than differences in value of people

Replying to

Laeserin

I'm trying to keep it public, but if people continue spamming it into a hot mess by printing books line-by-line into individual wiki pages, I'll have to rethink my policy.

I'm not checking my relay settings for you while you call books "spam" on a decentralized wiki. You could have simply asked me to check my relay settings. I assume this is targeted at me because I don't see anyone else starting to mirror books via NIP-54.

Replying to

Do you mean a translation or the Arabic text?

Translation might be easier for me to start copying over at first

Replying to

Please could you correct Kamala to Kamali. Because….

Done 👍

Replying to

Laeserin

That's what anyone experienced in data management and archiving says.

Listen, do whatever the heck you want, but continue to treat my holy book irreverently and I won't be responding to you, anymore.

Going to say this while I still can, just in case, if you end up muting me or blocking me: I appreciate your posts and stuff. No hard feelings about you disliking me since I know how abrasive my personality can be. I'll continue being highly supportive of the concept of a decentralized git.

Replying to

I can see that wikifredia had nil entries under Quran a few minutes ago.

Please could you upload the following?🥹

——

Being the verbal noun of the root word qara’a (to read), ‘Qur’an literally means ‘reading’ or ‘recitation.’

Source: Kamala, Mohammad Hashim, Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence

Next step would be to start adding the text itself from there, do you have any suggestions for a version to use?

Replying to

I can see that wikifredia had nil entries under Quran a few minutes ago.

Please could you upload the following?🥹

——

Being the verbal noun of the root word qara’a (to read), ‘Qur’an literally means ‘reading’ or ‘recitation.’

Source: Kamala, Mohammad Hashim, Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence

On it 💯

Replying to

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

best to stick to whitelisting on the relay for the time being probably, make a note on the landing page to request access so it can be revoked 🗡️

If this has something to do with me, be aware that wiki users will want a wiki that is as complete and accurate as possible, rather than one with its functionality crippled by censorship - and people seeking a decentralized wiki will be people who see that crippling content curation with censorship isn't needed when web of trust can be used to maximize accuracy and completeness. Relays blacklisting my content, especially in a wiki context, will only embarrass themselves in the long run.

Replying to

Laeserin

That's what anyone experienced in data management and archiving says.

Listen, do whatever the heck you want, but continue to treat my holy book irreverently and I won't be responding to you, anymore.