Now that he's dead, i wonder if he would change his mind.
Imagine not seeing how this is the same argument certain environmentalist used against bitcoin, about electricity usage.
This is not what they mean by this phrase. The "public" means this but "scientist" mean in combination with forest destruction. Burning down the Amazon for the sake of cow pasturage, for example.
Reducing net oxygen production from plants and canopy
The Federal Reserve in Flames, oil on canvas, 30 by 48 inches.Would you consider releasing an ordinal NFT series ?
I don't care for them, but the kids seem to like them as a way support artists.
Would love to read your comment but i couldn't find a route.
I thought it was new, given the sea water controversy. Thx
Its sad, but this is actually the best way to debunk Peter.
Everything in one image.
This way we can refer to cartesian coordinates for each argument instead of offering links to articles written in 2015 no one bothers to read.
Someone made a multiplication function for the STU-1, my 8bit computer that runs on bitvm (and thus on bitcoin)! It's true, you can write bitcoin smart contracts in Assembly now instead of learning boolean logic circuits. Try it yourself here: https://github.com/supertestnet/8bit-cpu-for-bitvm
https://video.nostr.build/4efaf6669ab2e30602ac016a1947a64e2c68310ca5e3f663714415a31cd6487c.mp4
Oh, sh!t. Will is even getting in on it !
Bro is as non-drama as the dalai lama.
This must be serious.
Choosing not to use open source is still a choice made in the free market. Forcing everyone to only use open source is not freedom.
Is it a bad choice ?
In most cases yes, terrible.
In some niche cases, without me approving of OCEAN, it makes sense. Like in house softwate for a competitive business.
I'm not sure i want my national electricity regulation software to be open source...
Based on discussion about it and not actually having looked at the code yet, it gives more control to the individual, something you should be for given your values.
If the premise is true, that an individual nodes carry limit can be ignored, this is forced association.
The size can also be adjusted back to the larger, inscription accepting size.
Basing my conclusion on this:
Effortless Transactions. Instant Satisfaction.
Master the art of simplicity: Send your Bitcoin in 4 easy steps directly from your mobile wallet and take self-custody, because why settle for anything less?
https://v.nostr.build/8J7W.mp4
1️⃣ Open the Envoy account to be spent from and tap Send.
2️⃣ Populate the recipient's address by pasting or scanning a QR code, enter the amount to be sent, and then tap Confirm.
3️⃣ Select the fee based on your required transaction priority and then tap Confirm.
4️⃣ Review the transaction details, then tap Send transaction. 💥
Welcome to Bitcoin, Simplified with Envoy! Download today:
Two, too many steps. I think this is a response to the coinbase ad right ? Despite being custodial and all sorts of other bad stuff, it "feels" easier in their marketing.
Get coinbase wallet, send URL.
Just a tip
This could get nasty.
Unlike a blocksize increase, this has a proven and profitable user base.
People part of the network, playing by the rules.
Decisions like this end projects, religions, families. They set a precendent.
Ossify and move changes to layer two before its too lare !!
Not once during this pump did i wonder:
"How is Ethereum doing?"
until now. Lol , dead meme coin
