Avatar
nix
7a69e5f62fcc20e81beea7461a945e6531f8c7944200d0b3cb4cc63556c44106
Love linux, self-hosting and privacy. Self-knowledge addict and occasional psychonaut. Lurking in farming and BTC discussions.
Replying to Avatar 𝟭𝗨𝗣

Not quite sure if this is sarcastic or someone was scared beyond any reason :)

Overpopulation is an even bigger lie than global warming.

corbettreport.substack.com/p/the-last-word-on-overpopulation-2011?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=725827&post_id=143323156&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=xlas&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium

If I owned too much of the world, and wanted to stay in control of the masses, I'd get them to fight with each other.

Race, gender, immigration, religion, social status... anything that keeps the 99.9% fighting each other and stops them from turning against the 0.1% enslaving them.

A good troll is hard to ignore. That's their craft.

It absolutely can be done though, and that's the only way.

Relieved that nobody told you gold is a shitcoin :)

Sometimes it feels like only one answer to everything is allowed here.

I understand why and agree with the goal, but everyone moves at their own pace and along their own route.

Replying to Avatar Hans Karlsborn

Devon Eriksen (@Devon_Eriksen_) on X:

”Let us suppose, for a moment, that you are an oligarch, or a member of the political class.

You're on top of the heap, and things are pretty good for you. You're wealthy, powerful, and immune to the consequences of your own failures.

What is the greatest threat to you, and to your peers?

Change. Instability. Volatility. Anything that disrupts the status quo. Because you're to top of the heap now, and if the heap gets shuffled, you're unlikely to be lucky enough to end up there again.

What you want is an end to history. No significant changes ever again, as far as you can manage it. No progress. No new technology. No growth.

Except that's difficult. Because humans keep having ideas and inventing stuff. They don't wait for your permission.

And change doesn't happen because the old way of doing things stops working. No, it happens long before that, and it happens because someone found a new, better way of doing things.

So what do you do to prevent this?

You throw all of your influence behind the vision of a steady-state, "sustainable" civilization. It's something humanity has never done before, it's not how humans evolved, or how they survived and prospered, but it can written up so that it seems to make a little sense, so long as you assume technological innovation stops happening.

Which, of course, is your real goal all along. You want humanity to exist in a perpetual state of late 20th century technology, so you and your descendants can rule forever until the sun goes nova or an asteroid hits the earth and wipes us out, which you consider to be a fair trade for your people being in charge until then.

So you need:

- An end to tech innovation: quash it with laws, taxes, and safety regulations. Disrupt and disenfranchise races and subcultures which have a tendency to innovate and disrupt economies.

- Endlessly renewable energy sources which are neither cheap nor abundant, because that might trigger innovation and growth: move away from oil and gas, prevent the construction of nuclear plants, build solar panels and windmills.

- World population shrunk to a level and held at which can be sustained without new tech: Disrupt relations between the sexes, promote infertility.

- Enough political power to do all these things without fear of opposition: expand central governments, tax populations into poverty, deliberately incur massive public debt so rival regimes that occasionally win elections cannot achieve meaningful change for fear of collapsing the government.

But you have a problem. If you want to shrink the population by limiting fertility, you're going to end up with a point in time where the old vastly outnumber the young, and cannot be supported.

So kill them”.

Control of the masses the ultimate goal for the 0.1%

If they can tell you what to want or hate, what to fear, what to work towards, they don't need to limit progress in general as they can direct it where they want it.

They aim to achieve control through scaring ppl into submission (scamdemics, foreign bogeymen, cyber false flags), propaganda and censorship of dissent

CVE-2024-3094 in XZ Utils may allow unauthorized access to Linux systems via sshd. Versions 5.6.0 and 5.6.1 of xz libraries contain malicious code.

Debian stable is not affected, but testing, unstable and experimental are. RedHat based distros are affected.

Check for linux updates today.

https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2024/03/29/cve-2024-3094-linux-backdoor/

ofc. I just expected that the article you link will support what you say, but it doesn't.

what in your opinion was the kgb's motive for organising this, if they did do it?

The article you point at says nothing about KGB organising that attack in 2002?

I was lookin for what the justification is in the article, but didn't even find the claim?

Not sure I can build it, but the world needs a decentralised wikileaks replacement. Anonymously built, anonymous to use,decentralised.

#freeAssange

What is the best way for my site to accept BTC payments? #asknostr

Disagree. Increasing access to information through literacy reduces indoctrination and is a prerequisite for learning critical thinking.