If youâre not willing to fork the chain, nothing you do will work.
Actually, not even forking will work, because thereâs countless different ways to embed arbitrary data in a blockchain. Youâll never be able to stop all of them.
Itâs all meaningless maxi purity virtue signaling. Peak retarded behavior.
You seriously care more about whatâs in the mempool than whatâs in the actual blockchain?
Thatâs like caring more about whatâs on the menu than what food the waiter gives you.
Reduce influence how?
Youâre ALREADY accepting these transactions onto your node. Unless youâre willing to change consensus rules and fork off, running Knots or filtering the mempool accomplishes nothing whatsoever.
Itâs all virtue signaling for maxi purity.
Itâs not a consensus level change. Itâs literally a mempool policy change. The most minor of changes, and clearly for the better.
You wouldâve had no idea (no cared) if Luke/Mechanic werenât major drama queens throwing a hissy fit.
Social pressure doesnât work if youâre not in the same social circles.
Yeah, theyâre such cunts forâŠ.
**checks notes***
âŠwanting a mempool that accurately reflects blocks.
If you really wanna do something, reject those blocks.
Core, because filtering is useless virtue signaling when the JPEGS are still gonna be mined into blocks anyway.
You canât filter JPEGs out of the blocks once itâs mined.
The âfilteringâ is all just virtue signaling.
Your Knots node stores those JPEGs too.
Long term, Core should focus on consensus only and leave policy changes like mempool policy to 3rd party clients.
Iâm #1 at complaining, and it ainât no competition.
Heâs a scumbag, but heâs innocent of what they charged him for.
Itâs a banger for sure đ„



