Telegram to Signal? Seriously?
Signal is one of the most obvious honeypots in the history of opsec.
What BusinessInsider has done is online rape.
They used the excuse of "fascism" to write a doxxing article, exploiting individual's private information for their profit.
I feel for my fellow developer nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6. It's absolutely unfair that you have to endure this.

The biggest accusations they could come up with is that fiatjaf "built at least two webpages devoted to disseminating the work of the far-right conspiracy theorist Olavo de Carvalho" and "said some things about Nazis".
90% of the article is just doxxing fiatjaf.
I encourage everyone to fight back on the "fascism" of Business Insider and report what they did as a completely unjustified violation of privacy.
h/t nostr:npub103a6vk43crw497dlaptwfmhctxqu22mwepshjcvvp29fzwrhtx4q675n6p
https://x.com/BitcoinBRS/status/1798804354322796589

Anyone who pays $149/year to read paywalled tripe - spaffed out by some gutter dwelling journorunt - doesn't have an opinion worth caring about anyway.
Parsed it and only stacked to read about Olavo de Carvalho... tbh.
I recommend you stop simping to authority.
Did all of that decades ago.
How will your neo-stasi masters know the difference between a some cypher and a jpeg?
Nothing will happen, unless the signal causes interference and someone reports it, or is broadcast on bandspace allocated to some people who really don't want you on it.
Uhmm... Why are people still asking permission from the government to use math.
"We will continue to be your single source of truth. Unless you hear it from us, it is not the truth." [sic.]
Plot twist... ecash is patented.
Use GNU Taler.
Spin the e-cash wheel to win the ecash prizes are you fucking kidding me lmfao
There'll come a point where not everyone will be able to own a UTXO.
Surely you could just abstain from cheese when taking the MB. Iirc MB doesn't need to be taken chronically in order to benefit from its rejuvenative effects?
Saylor is right.
The introduction of new opcodes is associated with unexpected and potentially critical risks.
Saylor advocates building on layer 2. His position is spot-on afaic.
Oat cereal contains glyphosphate.


nostr:note1836elwqc2prkcg5pka02v7s4t8c42zgtnqva7syx02pud0cjavdq6nt3en

