Understood. This account isn't doxxed and is anonymous for me, so if someone were to send me a pm I wouldn't be able to know if it is you or not
A discussion may not be appropriate for practical applications, but it is relevant in raising awareness and creating a discourse.
If thats not something you want to engage in I understand.
Always a tricky and stressful thing, especially for boat owners
I for one am happy you made the switch. How about we discuss how aml kyc measures erode due process?
E.g. kyc rules assume funds are illicit until you can prove Who you are and source of funds.
Completely bypasses the assumption of innocence until proven guilty. Bypasses warrants for seizure, etc
Also, all possible because the us is still in a state of emergency from 9/11?
Too many tokens out there, all ETH based too. Shame Venice opten to proceed with that route of funding
Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan has extracted the main points from Kansas Attorney General's lawsuit against Pfizer, & they're damning.
1. Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress, & omit material facts relating to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including the safety & efficacy of the vaccine.
2. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data – the study was repeatedly delayed, including a delay from January 2023 to February 2024 because of a late vaccination of a single study participant (out of 44,000 participants).
3. The FDA did not immediately make the safety & effectiveness data for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine available, claiming it would take 55 years, but a federal judge forced them to release 55,000 pages per month rather than 500.
4. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group once the FDA approved emergency use authorization in December 2020.
5. In its press release announcing the emergency use authorization, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its COVID-19 vaccine trials.
6. Pfizer knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis & pericarditis.
7. By March 2021, the United States military & Israel's Ministry of Health detected a safety signal for myocarditis.
8. In August 2021, after Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorization to provide its COVID-19 vaccine to 12-15-year-olds, Pfizer decided to study “how often” its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis in children by testing 5-16-year-olds for troponin I.
9. Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes. The FDA's & CDC's “surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine & strokes in people aged 65 & over," & an FDA study found that individuals 85 years or older who received both a flu vaccine and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine “saw a 20% increase in the risk of ischemic stroke.”
10. Pfizer’s knowledge of a safety signal for increased fatalities. In February 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
11. Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 trial participants who were in the 65- to 85-year-old age range & did not test it on any participant older than 85.
12. Pfizer did not publicly release adverse event data from its database. By February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events from 42,086 case reports, including 1,223 fatalities, although Pfizer did not make causality findings. Pfizer was receiving so many adverse events reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff & expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “nonserious cases.” Pfizer did not know “the magnitude of under-reporting.
13. Pfizer announced a study on pregnant women but omitted the fact that more than one in ten women (52) who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination. Six women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported premature deliveries; several babies died.
14. Pfizer’s February 18th, 2021, press release also did not disclose other adverse effects on the reproductive systems of women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. By April 2022, Pfizer knew of tens of thousands of adverse advents connected to its COVID-19 vaccine, including heavy menstrual bleeding (27,685), menstrual disorders (22,145), irregular periods (15,083), delayed periods (13,989), absence of periods (11,363) & other reproductive system effects
15. Pfizer’s study on pregnant women failed. They destroyed the placebo control group, & the results were kept secret.
16. Pfizer misrepresented & concealed material facts relating to the durability of protection provided by its COVID-19 vaccine.
17. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission even though it knew it had never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission.
18. Despite admissions by Pfizer Chairman & CEO Dr. Bourla and Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb that Pfizer did not know if its vaccine prevented transmission, Dr. Bourla warned Kansans on multiple occasions that not receiving a COVID-19 vaccine would affect the lives of those around them, thus implying that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission
19. Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims. On July 19th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed social media companies had an “obligation” & an “affirmative responsibility” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on their platforms. Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla called people who spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.”
20. Pfizer worked to conceal & suppress material facts. On August 24th, 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb contacted Twitter to complain about a column written by Alex Berenson that criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci. On August 27th, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb had a conference call with Twitter employees to discuss Mr. Berenson. Twitter banned Mr. Berenson the next day. Dr. Gottlieb also contacted Twitter about removing posts related to natural immunity, which "Twitter later slapped with a misleading label & blocked the ability to like or share the tweet."
The full article is linked below.
From Kanekoa The Great here
https://x.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1806393961738895417?t=HOHgl1gmsN6rLFqQmQs4_w&s=19
Anyone have a list of bitcoin communities/circular economies for me to include in the 2nd Edition of my book?
✨3333 sats to the first list with at least 30 on it.
✨Or 121 sats for each one, if you know just a few
No pmt for doubles..
I already have the following:
nostr:npub1zkr064avsxmxzaasppamps86ge0npwvft9yu3ymgxmk9umx3xyeq9sk6ec
nostr:npub1m3tu3l6y59g2tmackq23v5vgn59u7hu66gxg8xajghz59tqm6xnqk2m888
@bitcoinbeach
nostr:npub14f26g7dddy6dpltc70da3pg4e5w2p4apzzqjuugnsr2ema6e3y6s2xv7lu
@btcven (Bitcoin Venezuala)
@LakeBitcoin (Guatemala)
Thanks! 💜🧡
7milebitcoin.org
This is the way. Dont buy all at once, buy in slowly over time a little every month and forget about it.
Wasnt aware of your site! Did a quick visit and the articles appear interesting!
Its a culture clash... On one side you have people who are peaceful and want to resolve using diplomacy and on the other a group of people used to hardship .
Rfk is def. Fighting uphill. Many people even here are against him. Trump really did a great job on propaganda. I will always be for the candidate that is being censored by default.
Anyone being censored by mainstream is speaking more truth
I dont get it... Do you select the driver too helmet and all? Thats like half the image.
Iff I select only the bottom half (motorcycle only) I get it wrong, and if I select the entire bike plus driver I also get it wrong.
Hahaha yeah, that's exactly what's happening
I think I'm this case just spreading the link is beating censorship. I'm 100% against mainstream media/politics censoring anyone.
Trump is pro israel, biden is, and yes rfk is.
If you had to chose between 20%, 60% or 80% on an exam, which grade would you choose? 80% isn't 100%, I dont think any candidate would ever be 100% for everyone .
I disagree with rfks stance on israel, but agree with much more of what he says than either dual party candidates






