Avatar
Robert Allen
813cf5bbaf675abb1ef2869cb55f69809bc93eab778f8c42365ec65e14bb4ec1
#Bitcoin Maximalist | πŸ‹πŸΌ | πŸ₯© | ✝️ | πŸ§‘πŸΌβ€πŸ’» CEO Tirith Technology | Producer "Bitcoin & Friends" | Co-Founder Satlantis.io | Keys.Band NIP7 Extension | Jesus is Lord

I love how smug he is about his superior intelligence. Is he for real? This is so bad that it feels like he’s joking. β€œPride goeth before a fall.” πŸ˜‚

The corn is growing tall.

nostr:note1ugusczrzulsxsafxdhwra8kjmgnanmu0v7t22phw6a95t95vcr0sanj29q

Those wars were both funded with inflation. What is he talking about? πŸ˜‚

Granted, β€œzapping” and β€œplebs” are new terms, but I feel I would have intuited that stuff. πŸ˜…

If you told me 10 years ago that I would be zapping small amounts of Bitcoin to plebs around the world on a decentralized communication protocol, I would have believed it. Let’s keep going! πŸ’ͺπŸ™ŒπŸŽ‰

This is helpful. Merging makes sense. Ideally, feels to me like this should be hidden from users and just default to the better encryption (although, maybe there is some debate on that point?). But I guess if you default to 44 and some clients don’t support it, then that is a very bad UX too. So then perhaps separating these out and forcing users to actively choose makes sense? This is definitely a sticky issue.

nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn nostr:npub1arkn0xxxll4llgy9qxkrncn3vc4l69s0dz8ef3zadykcwe7ax3dqrrh43w nostr:npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6 any of you know how clients are handling NIP04 and NIP44? Implement support for both but use 44 as default for outgoing messages? Any idea which clients are already using 44 (if any)?

Hi nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m I joined this because of your presentation in Madeira. Thank you for everything.

Welcome πŸ€—

Replying to Avatar Leo Wandersleb

Yesterday I went to a "cueva" - informal money exchanges in the streets of Buenos Aires. A guy told me the address. A jewelry dealer he said. It was a store front with an all opaque window except for three little boxes featuring three pieces of jewelry. The door was locked and had a button. I pressed the button and was let in and found myself in a tiny entrance, a gated window to my right and another locked door ahead. I was let in again. Inside people were busy counting bills, I actually did see gold jewelry and a young guy sitting at a table was busy slicing silver for another client. Or at least he was clipping strips of some silver color metal sheet. Others came in and left with bags full of bills - near worthless bills of 1000 or 2000 Argentinian Pesos or $1US to $2US.

It was my turn. As they had a big neon Bitcoin sign with the Bitcoin price in USD, I assumed it would be smooth sailing and said I'd like to sell some sats, please. The young guy quoted me a price - a 3% markup - but only wanted stable coin USD. I insisted I don't have that and he asked what wallet I was using - maybe to check if it had a swap to USDt option or something and I kept insisting that I only had BTC and would rather not show him my app (Yeah, Phoenix, please let me hide my balance from the main screen, please). He referred me to another guy in the room and they both were giggling about that hodler they had here.

That's where I felt really not very secure. Around me 3 guys I had to assume were best friends, with two locked door separating me from any public audience. In the end they gave me 400 bills of 500ARS and I asked if they don't have at least the 1k bills. He just smiled and said "it's all yours". Needless to say I was not comfortable counting 400 bills right there, so I left with a stack-of-bills sized paper bag and waited some 10 long minutes for an Uber.

So did they cheat you or did it come out correctly when you counted?