Avatar
Filip
82352a9394edf4a39ac9553a3525173f82718beab64b2710de81880bc565ca6c

Great summary of how DeepSeek's reinforcement learning algorithm accomplishes model training.

Also easy to see how having an open source model and APIs can be a game changer for creating custom agents and workflows and the AI startup indusry in general:

https://youtu.be/sGUjmyfof4Q?si=nUIFIYpsBRDCprhm

Replying to aab38d14...

nostr:npub1vz555w0w7pdy3l9skg202lkdnjqll4ct67l25f68x2h84e7u7r4qmrqdta my insurance covers homeopathy btw. It's really, really weird.

And anthroposophy: it has antisemitic foundations and had a complicated relationship with Nazism...

https://www.ruhrbarone.de/anthroposophie-und-nationalsozialismus-die-waldorfschulen-erziehen-zur-volksgemeinschaft/44449/

And in recent times Waldorf schools were (and still are) a hotbed for vaccine scepticism...

True that many Waldorf folks are vaccine sceptics, but the Nazi thing couldn't be further from the truth.

Steiner and his sympathisers were driven out of Germany by Nazi and Volkischer Nationalismus sympathisers and settled in Switzerland. Their first building, the Goetheanum was burned down by Nazis in 2022.

Agree with everything you mentioned. I'm just unsure if this is the initial phase which we come out of. For example, the rich and the intelligent will have to figure out how to flex their financial muscle in a way that's beneficial to everyone. The focus will be more on the problems of wider society then on the success of individuals and businesses.

Still undecided.... but yes, we are in a deep hole with education, health, society...

Social Dilemmas No.64

I wonder if direct democracy would work? That is everyone votes for everything and we decide every rule and government policy based on how the people voted. Would it bring the worst of us or the best? Or create more social and geographical bubbles with radically different ehtoses?

I feel it might be a bit like snowboarding; hard to get right at first, but once you get the hang of it, you love it and want to participate all the time. I'm sure that we'd see hard core lobbying at first by many special interest groups, and we'd have to suffer some lows before learning how to best navigate for OUR OWN interests. We certainly have the technology to do it...

Aloof Equation No.1

Is the fight for women's rights hitting a huge roadblock because of the Law of the Instrument (i.e. If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything starts looking like a nail)? Let me explain...

It feels like a lot of the success of the movement hinges on how many men can be replaced by women as CEOs, elite marketable athletes and other professions dominated by men. What may not be obvious is that a lot of those roles have been created to suit the traditional male abilities and temperaments. By trying to slot women into those roles, we are asking them to act like men in order to show that they can be successful. That's the hammer.

If we really care about empowering women, then we have to give everyone the support and freedom to try new things and do things their own way and evaluate long term success. As a society we certainly could use fresh ideas and structures in all walks of life, and by supporting expanded inclusivity of viewpoints for setting rules and creating structures, we'd certainly find things that benefit our society more as a whole.

From a business perspective, it's fascinating how the American defense industry overcame the gloomy business prospects of the rising opposition to American involvement in overseas wars. They correctly identified that seeing Americans soldiers getting killed overseas in questionable missions had the largest impact on the popular sentiment, and political candidates would have interest in addressing this. Now there seems to be at least one or two active wars (Ukraine, Gaza) that Americans supply weapons to (and have no real interest in ending). They found a market for their products while eliminating the negative perception.

I wish we would apply the same acumen to some green initiatives. In Canada you can no longer buy single-use plastic bags anywhere. But stores sell much thicker plastic "forever bags" for a fraction of a dollar, and I see people buying them every day. What's really the net impact at the end of the day? And on top of that, most products I buy, including some produce comes in plastic containers.

Seems like we missed the mark. Would a better solution have been to standardize the take-away plastic bags to be easily reused as garbage bags? Everyone still has to buy garbage bags, so we are not adding any net new plastic. On the other hand they would not be single use any more, and we would eliminate having to dispose any shopping bags.

Social Dilemmas No.63

Has perception of things become more important than the actual effect? Not just politics, but business, finances, life...

Surely we are not infallible and if we care about getting things right, we would value and praise when someone stands up and says that they got it wrong and they need to fix it. That should inspire confidence in the individual. But it doesn't. We view it as a sign of weakness.

And until we get our priorities straight, we'll continue to be subjected to cycles of disjointed stories and clips that are made to look good just at a first glance. But that's OK, because you'll be immersed in something else in 5,4,3,2....