It was fud in the sense that it instilled (or could) a sense of fear, uncertainty, &/or doubt about (a shitcoin (& shitcoins at large)).
I didn't say that it was untrue.
This is the comment that has Jack Mallers scratching his head. The argument being made against him is that what he said fits what the acronym FUD stands for. However, as Jack points out, "FUD" has colloquially come to be synonymous with "misinformation". If it didn't mean misinformation, it would be strange to complain about. "Hey you're causing people to fear and doubt this thing" is a complaint someone who wants to control people would make, but "hey this is misinformation" is a much different complaint.
I'd be a fool not to mention once again GiGi's article about "The words we use in Bitcoin": https://dergigi.com/2022/06/27/the-words-we-use-in-bitcoin/ The words we use to describe things matter because the scammers will twist them and present them with wildly different meaning than what we intended. I want to encourage my peers to stop saying FUD. To decry people who use the word FUD to complain about articles and to instead use the word that we actually mean to say: Misinformation or misconstrued.
Precision is the weapon of truth against scammers and FUD has come to be a shitty blunt force descriptor.
This is me most of the time lol.
First of all chaumin e-cash and robux are digital currencies with no consensus.
Second of all, some of these shitcoins really be backed by a single personality. Like a founder or president (Charles) or CEO or business and they often have backdoors to ensure their word is "consensus"
Is it really consensus if the options are go along with a hard fork 1 person decided to implement or leave?
Its a Steven He video about the iPhone 15
Well, its not for Bitcoins sake, its more for your sake. "Bitcoin" (or a weird centralized iteration of Bitcoin) could technically exist with a mere RAID solution on a single computer.
I say "Bitcoin" because it really just wouldn't be the same without its userbase keeping each other honest and bickering over whether we should or should not activate a BIP.
No running a node is about protecting yourself from counterfeit (you sure your wallet doesn't just say Bitcoin but actually mean BCH?) As well as being another peer that says they will or will not support XYZ (the real decentralization pressures) nostr:note1s5mzkcnyp7nfc3gj75ugql2635630996tgwp0smac8rur9zcrahsngmehk
Would also advise that you put said alarm in a place where you have to stand up and walk over towards to turn it off
Hmm I was under the impression that mutiny wallet had implemented its own mint, but after looking it up to make sure I wasn't wrong I found out I was wrong lol.
So fedimint's idea was that a multi-sig of locals would serve their community, but with fedimints of multiple companies emerging, do you think fedimint is building out wrong, or that the original proposition was wrong?
You want us to onboard girls to nostr. I'm asking for tips on how we should do that XD
Should we pose with our abs out holding a dumbell up with one arm and a kitten with the other?
So...How are we activating Eltoo?
Doxxed?
Freezer: a work in progress.
https://video.nostr.build/4e2344e13a51bcc19ab58e439d04ad7071d97f2ec90aca0376220f9d979ea423.mp4
Hey, where's the git page for this?
Lnsymmetry aka eltoo would allow you to replace any older state with a newer state.
It can be accomplished with either APO or "LNHANCE" which is CTV+CSFS (op_internalkey is just a nice simple space saving thing also in LNHANCE but not needed for eltoo)
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=500x672&blurhash=_NK-nBz*%3Dpa5f%2CbbNa*G13XjovNIRljYr_xGRQjubFa%7Et6M%23WBs%2BRUxojuWE9ixmR-WFoHn%24oftSoyNGW%3DbFocahxAa7xZa%23Rnt2WEWkNMj%3DjYWFoebFbpNIW.ovWYa%23oL&x=e7058590b436eea30f4dd1b46e1c7bb33f31647a5c59aabca596ebd5462029aaSo you gonna drive to your old address to pick it up? XD
The $GME (aka wall street bets) crowd have had Bitcoin in their robinhood app for a long ass time
Guis, check out LNHance. Its a 3 BIP combo that allows Eltoo.
"3 BIPs? APO is just 1!" I hear you saying. Yes, but each one of these BIPs is very constrained about what it does.
"(APO) can also be used to emulate a CTV-like covenant and all its use-cases, but this emulation is both more fragile (as you need to store signatures and pre-signed transactions) and less efficient, so it is not an ideal solution to bring about these use-cases."
https://covenants.info/proposals/apo/
Review it, think about the trade offs and come back to talk about what you think we should be doing. nostr:note1dp4u4mx4zvzthfxfay40ptzus5vy8g6ve9edxsaxkefeqt90tjasavl3y6
On what relays do it be like that again? I pruned my global relays to paid only a long time ago