My understanding is that connecting to more #relays may help my posts to be preserved over time. It seems that many of my posts have been lost for reasons that are unclear to me.
#nostr #relay
Thanks for the reply. I’m currently connected to 30 #relays and I haven’t perceived a drop in performance so far. #nostr #relay
Is there any drawback for a #Nostr user to connect to « too many » #relay?
#asknostr
It looks like YouTube already suppressed this interview… You can still watched it on #Odysee. Some great DIY #health advices towards the end of interview.
Thanks nostr:npub1pngq7wrz3u00zdtjrhunm9vy5s8nhvk0g0mg6vqlqgwavvw8f74snwl5ms !
#Monero #XMR #CBDC nostr:note1edjxv8mttqvd638rqhkngrx0dgaewexjnrjpu67u7sf7ffp08nkqqzw9zv
The #aliens subject is probably the topic with the most #psyop and counter-psyops. Even those who have researched the topic in depth can’t know the full extent of what’s legit and what’s propaganda. Personally, I think Richard Dolan is one #UFO researcher than can be trusted. If you’re not too familiar with the #alien subject, it’s probably a good place to start.
This is an insane attack on #Bitcoin and #FOSS… You can still contribute to the defense fund: https://fossdef.org/
#Faketoshi #BTC nostr:note1knwppcmw6tjak30wy9vgud6uve2fxuwkcycatez0hc79q6ddh3sqk5xkhr
Good to see #Odysee moving towards brighter outlooks by partnering with #Arweave and its ecosystem. Odysee goals to fully decentralized are also reaffirmed.
#AR #LBRY #LBC #Crypto
https://reclaimthenet.org/odysee-solid-future-fully-decentralize
Or is it that scanning the voucher creates the wallet for them with the funds in it?
I don’t really understand how people with no wallet can receive the sats. Do you mean that you’ll give a voucher (like a bank note) that they can cash out later? But they would still need to setup a wallet before cashing out the voucher, correct?
Some interesting comments from Amaury Séchet related to #drivechains on #Bitcoin and #subnets on on #eCash
#Bip300 #BTC XEC
Interesting perspective on the #alien mummies presented in Mexico and other #UFO related things.
#alien
As I was mentioning in this note: note1yst27jnugn5fjuza4nt5e7fuqrcujjjsxv6yqw2740tuaxvav9rqjlm2md
Here is the debunking article of the Nazca #alien mummy from Snopes.com: https://web.archive.org/web/20230913101302/https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/alien-mummy-peru/
And here is the paragraph from the article that quote the source of the debunking:
« In 2015, Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan, who reported the existence of the Nazca mummy to Gaia and is featured in the video, led an event called Be Witness, at which a mummified body — purportedly that of an alien — was unveiled. Later, though, that "alien" discovery was debunked, and the mummified corpse was shown to be that of a human child. »
The paragraph links to the source article: https://web.archive.org/web/20230727182625/http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2015/05/tony-bragalia-and-end-of-roswell-slides.html
The source article discuss about the « Roswell alien slides » which has no connexion to the Nazca alien mummy that the Snopes article has supposedly debunked. It’s unclear why the source article mentions a totally unrelated event. I went go back through the original versions of wayback machine and I couldn’t find a version that mentions the Nazca mummy. Wayback machine has been caught in the past to alter some results but it’s unclear to me what happened with this article.
Why would Snopes.com reference this article to debunk the Nazca mummy? I have no idea but obviously this can’t be called a debunking. If I have to guess it looks like an another attempt at debunking an info by gaslighting the reader.
As I said, I’ve only done cursory research on the topic but I’ve since looked a bit more into it and I can’t find other sources presenting a credible debunking of the Nazca #alien mummy. Obviously, I’m open to contradictory evidence but as it stands saying that those #aliens are fake because Maussan had been caught cheating in the past doesn’t seem to be supported by any evidence and that’s sadly what the USA Today article does…
#UFO
As I was mentioning in this note: note1yst27jnugn5fjuza4nt5e7fuqrcujjjsxv6yqw2740tuaxvav9rqjlm2md
Here is the debunking article of the Nazca #alien mummy from Snopes.com: https://web.archive.org/web/20230913101302/https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/alien-mummy-peru/
And here is the paragraph from the article that quote the source of the debunking:
« In 2015, Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan, who reported the existence of the Nazca mummy to Gaia and is featured in the video, led an event called Be Witness, at which a mummified body — purportedly that of an alien — was unveiled. Later, though, that "alien" discovery was debunked, and the mummified corpse was shown to be that of a human child. »
The paragraph links to the source article: https://web.archive.org/web/20230727182625/http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2015/05/tony-bragalia-and-end-of-roswell-slides.html
The source article discuss about the « Roswell alien slides » which has no connexion to the Nazca alien mummy that the Snopes article has supposedly debunked. It’s unclear why the source article mentions a totally unrelated event. I went go back through the original versions of wayback machine and I couldn’t find a version that mentions the Nazca mummy. Wayback machine has been caught in the past to alter some results but it’s unclear to me what happened with this article.
Why would Snopes.com reference this article to debunk the Nazca mummy? I have no idea but obviously this can’t be called a debunking. If I have to guess it looks like an another attempt at debunking an info by gaslighting the reader.
As I said, I’ve only done cursory research on the topic but I’ve since looked a bit more into it and I can’t find other sources presenting a credible debunking of the Nazca #alien mummy. Obviously, I’m open to contradictory evidence but as it stands saying that those #aliens are fake because Maussan had been caught cheating in the past doesn’t seem to be supported by any evidence and that’s sadly what the USA Today article does…
#UFO
A lot of folks calling this « distractions » or #psyop. I’m not going to say whether or not these are likely real or fake because I haven’t researched the topic enough but based on the cursory research I’ve made on those who supposedly have debunked prior Maussan’s work, I can say that the debunking they’ve presented are bogus. If there are good evidences that these are fake or that Maussan isn’t credible, please share.
#UFO #Alien #Aliens nostr:note1qcvykqw9dkek39vwewxhydch05tvq4phzzuztyfeg27fpg9ypd3skut5es
nostr:npub1z06laf0rhhwzd7h0y303hfp6e7r29e8p6vyl2yr7nv5uefdgtcfslny3q9 I think the opposite, actually. Nobody is buying this shit.
From USAToday article:
« In 2015, Maussan unveiled the existence of what was alleged to be an alien body unearthed in Nazca, Peru. Later, though, that "alien" discovery was debunked, and the mummified corpse was shown to be that of a human child with a head deformity, according to fact-checking website snopes.com. »
I haven’t been following Maussan’s work (although I had hear about the Nazca alien) but I know for a fact that Snopes.com had been pushing some fake debunking in the past which made me want to check what this debunking is about. If you look at the Snopes’ article and go back to the original source of the supposed debunking of Maussan’s work, you’ll find out that the debunking is totally bogus. It seems that the debunking source has retracted its claims.
So basically USAToday article attempts to discredit Maussan on the basis of a bogus debunking.
#Aliens #UFO
Why not? Hasn’t ever occurred to you that our genetic baggage may have been seeded on Earth?
#Aliens #ET #UFO
There are for sure a lot of scams but most (not all) top market cap projects didn’t start with the intent to scam people. I think most of the top projects have been looking to innovate and bring something to the industry. Many (if not most) fail to do so but innovation in all industries always had a higher failure rate. But to me there is a difference between a scam and a failing startup. Sometime, it’s unclear whether a project is more of a scam or an enterprise which genuinely failed to deliver on its promise. Now, you’re right that the tokenomics of most (but not all) #crypto is horrendous because of the initial distribution. Does this make them a scam? I don’t think so, but it certainly makes them a poor investment for retail investment in which initial investors can certainly be qualified of profiteers. Again, Bitcoin had been the best investment since its inception (although it hasn’t been in the past cycle) and it can’t be replicated but that doesn’t make every other project a scam.
Bitcoin can’t scale on-chain? Maybe that’s one reason we should have drivechains…
That’s totally fine that you don’t need any of these but others want/need them. Hence, my original point to say that it’s nonsensical to call everything but #Bitcoin a #shitcoin, unless you think the World revolves over your personal needs and those of your pairs.