2018 - Q: “Fight! Fight! Fight!”

2024 - Trump: “Fight! Fight! Fight!”

Subliminal auditory priming is a psychological phenomenon where an individual's subconscious mind is influenced by a sound or auditory stimulus that has been presented briefly and outside of their conscious awareness. This type of stimulation can affect the processing and retrieval of memories, thoughts, and emotions without the person being explicitly aware of the connection.

In subliminal auditory priming, a specific word or phrase is introduced through an auditory cue, such as a short sound or voice recording. This stimulus then triggers an associated memory or thought in the subconscious mind, even if the individual isn't consciously paying attention to it. The influence of this stimulus can manifest as changes in mood, behavior, or cognitive processing.

For instance, imagine walking down a street and hearing someone whisper "apple" very softly. Even though you might not be aware of the whisper, the word "apple" could still prime your brain to think about apples, memories related to them, or associated words like "fruit" or "juice."

Subliminal auditory priming is used in various fields such as marketing, education, and psychotherapy to understand how our brains process information and how we can influence our thoughts and behavior through subtle cues. However, it's essential to note that the effects of subliminal auditory priming are generally mild and may not be strong enough to significantly change someone's beliefs or actions without their awareness.

In summary, subliminal auditory priming is a psychological phenomenon where an individual's subconscious mind is influenced by brief and unconscious auditory stimuli, leading to changes in thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.

#Trump #TrumpAssassination #PsyOp #FalseFlag

So the Qanon content was all a joke? And all the Qproofs were coincidences? I think the Qanon op can difficulty framed a it.

Do you think that Qanon is an anti-“majority deep state” operation conducted by the minority faction?

If you believe that #Trump fights for the people and is against the deep state, then you need to make sense of the following:

Trump was an active participant in the #Qanon operation. Indeed, initially the Qanon narrative gained a lot of credibility through the Qproofs (https://qproofs.com/q-proofs) which were proofs that Trump and Q were coordinating through “cryptic messages”.

While some people still believe the Qanon narrative, many came to the conclusion that Qanon was a deep state psyop aiming to misdirect and discredit the pedogate/pizzagate research which originated from some Wikileaks documents. The operation had been quite successful as most people now believe that the pizzagate narrative originated from Qanon whereas the primary materials actually originated from Wikileaks (Podesta and DNC emails).

Trump even referenced the #DeepState Qanon psyop after getting back on his feet.

Did you know that the “Fight, fight, fight” statement made by Trump right after his alleged assassination attempt is a famous Qanon reference?

Here is the proof:

https://qanon.pub/?q=FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

https://qanon.pub/?q=Fight%2C Fight%2C Fight

So considering that Qanon is a deep state psyop and Trump was actively participating in it. How can you make sense of the narrative that Trump isn’t a deep state asset and fights for the people?

So far, no one had been able to resolve this contradiction. That’s one reason that leads me to believe that the #TrumpAssassination was most likely staged.

Do you believe that Qanon is a legit anti deep state operation or a controlled opposition deep state operation?

That should give you a clue as to whether this alleged assassination attempt was staged or not.

They are not telling you how Monero is a shitcoin. They are telling you how Monero is different from Bitcoin. Of course no other crypto is going to be like Bitcoin (similarly to how no other crypto is going to be like Monero). Ask for a definition of what a shitcoin is and you won’t have any consistent answer.

The supply is verifiable cryptocraphically.

Bitcoin maxis can’t define what a shitcoin is other than by the definition that everything that isn’t Bitcoin is a shitcoin.

I don’t disagree. No elected President is going to dismantle the government. I think RFK could take apart some problematic pieces of it (especially in the federal agencies). I don’t think RFK is perfect either but I have not seen evidence that he’s owned by the deep state (although I can’t exclude it). What do you mean by “he’s not independent”? Which interests own him?

I don’t think anyone shot at Trump.

I have not hear anybody formulating this hypothesis, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Crooks didn’t even fire a single shot. There were multiple professional shooters involved in the #TrumpAssassination and Crooks wasn’t one of them. It’s suspicious that the FBI cleaned up the roof on which Crooks was located. There may not have been any trace of gun powder but, we’ll never know.

#Trump #FalseFlag

According to John Cullen video analysis, the first shot couldn’t have come from Crook’s direction. I think the first 6 pops may be from two different guns shooting in synch.

Updated analysis on the #TrumpAssassination

I think the deep state is involved in this operation but the case I'll be making below is that we can't exclude that this operation is a staged assassination attempt.

Indeed, many of us in the "truther" community came to the conclusion that #Trump, to the same extent as Biden, is a deep state asset. If this is true, it would then be difficult to explain why the #DeepState would want to assassinate their front-running candidate.

You may find ridiculous the idea that Trump is a deep state asset when the narrative that Trump is fighting the deep state is broadly accepted. However, did you know that Trump has numerous deep state ties including with the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros? Also, how to explain the involvement of Trump in the Qanon #psyop (through the Qproofs) if Trump is going after the deep state? In 2016, Trump got elected on the promise that he will drain the swamp but instead of draining it, he appointed the swamp to his administration (Barr, Ross, Acosta who were all associates of Epstein). Don’t believe me? I recommend you watched these two mirrored videos from Jake Morphonios (most of his research had been taken off the internet):

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WpxeUOiWikO9 https://www.bitchute.com/video/QAW9y6emuHWB

If it is a #FalseFlag, then how can we explain that the deep state would have taken the risk to kill Trump by aiming at his ear? It seems like a very dangerous stunt even for a skilled shooter. To this my response is, what evidence do we have that a bullet grazed Trump’s ear? We have:

1. photographic evidence:

Bullet passing by Trump:

Blood on Trump's right hand after touching his ear:

2. ballistic sound analysis evidence (source: https://youtu.be/LouUbMYb7Bc)

Are these evidences indisputable proofs that a bullet grazed Trump's ear? As of now, I would say no and here is why.

First regarding the photographic evidence. It's important to note that these photos were taken by Doug Mills who is a renowned photographer but also part of the "mockingbird media sphere". Interesting fact, did you know that he's the photographer who took the photo of Bush in a classroom when being notified that the 9/11 attacks just happened? (source: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/26/doug-mills-iconic-president-photos-226744/ / https://www.tampabay.com/news/nation-world/2021/09/10/during-sarasota-visit-president-george-w-bush-learned-of-911-attack/ ). Since Doug Mills has been following many Presidents it's not necessarily improbable that he was with Bush on 9/11, however what are the chances that he would be covering a small Trump's rally? Has Doug Mills covered other Trump's rallies? If not, he's for sure very lucky to have been attending this one.

Also, I'm not an expert in photo forensic but until we have the confirmation from multiple independent experts that these photos haven't been tampered with, I would consider these photographic evidences as non definitive. What if the bullet and blood would have been added to the originals? I've looked at the video of the shooting and while the resolution is not as good, I couldn't see any trace of blood on Trump's right hand. This element is certainly worth investigating further.

Screenshots from the video showing no apparent trace of blood:

Second, regarding the ballistic sound analysis evidence the hypothesis is that some bullets are passing by Trump's microphone which leads us to conclude that the first three shots are composed of a supersonic bullet sound followed by the crack of the gun. However, in the hypothesis in which no bullet were aimed at Trump, could we come to a different but still coherent conclusion? For instance, it could be possible that the first 6 sounds (3 supersonic and 3 cracks) are actually coming from 2 different guns shooting in a synchronized manner to appear as they were shot from a single gun shooting three bullets at Trump? The video analysis from John Cullen seems to be supporting this hypothesis (although he's not discussing the hypothesis that the event could have been staged) as he claims that the first shot couldn't have been aimed at Trump. Source: https://rumble.com/v57dfwl-brave-tv-ep-1821-john-cullen-breaking-open-the-trump-assassination-attempt-.html

In conclusion, I don't think we have yet any evidence allowing us to indisputably conclude that any shot was aimed at Trump.

If the scenario of an assassination attempt can't be confirmed yet, what evidences do we have to support the scenario of a staged assassination? First, we should remind ourselves that the deep state had executed several more complex false flag operations before. So saying “it couldn’t have been done” is ignoring a core expertise of the deep state. To be clear, I don't think we have any definitive evidence for this scenario either but here some elements that weights towards it:

- Despite the presence of 2 or 3 shooters (1 or 2 with military equipment) and having only one (maybe two) shooter being neutralized, they failed their alleged assassination mission.

- All shooters missed their target and shot at the crowd. According to John Cullen, one shooter wasn’t aiming at Trump but allegedly at a secret service sniper however, why would they have aimed at only one unit of SS sniper when several were present? Wouldn't it have been more effective to aim directly at Trump to reach their assassination mission?

- If we had multiple shooters and only Crooks was neutralized, how to explain that the second and potential third shooters didn't attempt to assassinate Trump again when he got up on his feet and was directed to his car?

- The presence of the “mockingbird” photograph Doug Mills needs further investigation. How many Trump's rallies was Doug Mills present at? Why would he have chosen this one which was a small rally?

- The timing of the shooting is interesting. The shooting happened as Trump was commenting a chart (it would be interesting to know how often Trump has commented a chart before in his rallies). As a magician on stage, Trump could have been using the power of attention and misdirection to successfully divert the attention of the crowd off of him. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that Trump said “take a look” five times (and pointed at the chart) to direct the attention of the public to the chart just before the shots started. Maybe this explains why we still don’t have any footage from crowd that was behind Trump. Maybe all eyes were focused on the chart. That’s too bad because it may have help us settling the question as to whether or not a bullet grazed Trump’s ear.

- In the end, this event strongly solidify the posture of Trump as a national Hero victim of dark deep state forces. The sequence of events aligns perfectly to benefit the Trump camp (right before the RNC). Overall, it almost seems too perfect for Trump (and maybe scripted) than organic chaos.

- The recount of the shooting by Trump (during the RNC) is not authentic and seems scripted (he says that as he was still on the ground, the crowd was pointing at the shooter and people could see all the blood, source: https://youtu.be/4MVep85ykg4) reinforcing the narrative that Trump is not in control and people are pulling strings behind him.

- There are numerous past evidences that Trump is owned by some elements of the deep state hence, why would they want to kill him unless the deep state is divided in multiple factions of divergent interests.

What would be the motives for a false flag/staged assassination attempt?

- Discredit the narrative that Trump is a deep state asset

- Counter the rise of RFK (non-controlled opposition) currently polling at 19%

- Prop up Trump as a national Hero and broadening his support in preparation of a potential involvement in WW3 (or other major event requiring the mobilization of the whole population)

The shorting of DJT could certainly indicate some prior knowledge from some individual but if it was a #FalseFlag it could also have been used to make us believe that they were planning on killing #Trump.

In the absence of indisputable evidence confirming one scenario over the other, it’s impossible to know for sure if this was an assassination attempt or a false flag.

Either the deep state got caught trying to assassinate Trump or they used reverse psychology to make us believe that they got caught trying to assassinate Trump.

The coincidences/facts that would be supporting a false flag are:

- Despite the presence of 3 shooters (2 with military equipment) and having only one (maybe two) shooter being neutralized, they failed their alleged assassination mission.

- All shooters missed their target and shot at the crowd. One shooter wasn’t aiming at the crowd but alledgely at the SS snipers however, why would they have aimed at only one unit of SS sniper when several were present?

- The timing of the shooting happening right before Trump diverting attention to the chart (saying five times “look at the chart”) is interesting.

- The presence of the “mockingbird” photograph Doug Mills needs further investigation. Was Doug Mills present at all Trump’s rally? If not, why would he have chosen this one which was a small rally?

- In the end, this event strongly solidify the posture of Trump as a national Hero victim of dark deep state forces. The sequence of events aligns perfectly to benefit the Trump camp (right before the RNC). Overall, it seems more like it was scripted than organic chaos.

- The recount of the shooting by Trump is not authentic and seems scripted reinforcing the narrative that Trump is not in control and people are pulling strong behind him.

- There are numerous past evidences that Trump is owned by some elements of the deep state hence, why would they want to kill him unless the deep state is divided in multiple factions of divergent interests.

None of these elements constitute a definitive proof that the #TrumpAssassination was staged though.

Very insightful interview. We are already starting to see the same pattern that we’ve seen with #Trump’s first term where Trump surrounds himself with #DeepState figures to advance the #SurveillanceState agenda. At which point liberty-minded Trump supporters will start questioning the role played by Trump? nostr:note1wgxg2crzqt2pujy486hfvse34x2d4g3vctp926709msygyfgv38ql065et

After taking a closer look, some pictures of Trump shows that he had some blood on his right hand. Not that it’s all over but that’s certainly how he could have perceived it. That said the recount of the event is clearly scripted as he describes scenes he couldn’t have seen.

#Trump recounts the event: “And moved my right hand to my ear, brought it down. My hand was covered in blood. Just absolutely blood all over the place”.

As per the video footage when Trump gets up, there is absolutely not a drop of blood on his hands. False memory, gross inconsistency in the narrative or did the secret service took the time to clean his hand?

What’s interesting is that a lot of the elements of that Trump recounts are not from his perspective at the time of the event. For instance, he says that as he was still on the ground, the crowd was pointing at the shooter and people could see all the blood. This doesn’t seem like an authentic recount of the scene by him. Someone else wrote this script for him, but the #DeepState should be careful not hiring interns next time.

See at 2:25:

https://youtu.be/4MVep85ykg4

#TrumpAssassination #FalseFlag #PsyOp

Another magic trick they’ve fooled the public with. Taking down three skyscrapers with two planes. Let that sink in.

#DeepState #911 #FalseFlag #PsyOp #TrumpAssassination nostr:note190p66atd29ldc552p28pgn8cxs06308sqrluynsl26n5txjy9guqvvyapa

Many people on Twitter debunked it. Ludovic Rudkowski even deleted it after admitting it was a fake. https://x.com/lukewearechange/status/1814061077292024199

I’d like to see it because if it’s this one then it’s a fake: nostr:note14wkd2cn22n3fp9pmedpcnny8zkklm2udm32a7d0taewg2x95rmusa4tvvk

Fake video. Is it not interesting that we still don’t have a close up footage from the crowd behind Trump at the moment of the shooting? Maybe because Trump directed the public attention to the chart by saying “take a look” five times just before the shots started.