Iβve been banned from twitterX for a long time so I canβt respond there, but regardless of your view, this quote is so badass I had to say something, nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak love it!
Saifedean Ammous
@saifedean
Bitcoin, as it is, saved my family from hyperinflation in Lebanon. It is entirely essential to my life. It works perfectly fine for me as it is. It is not some "cool" piece of software whose next iterations I'm "excited" about. It is my lifeline. If it never ads a single capability, it will still be the most important technological innovation of my lifetime.
If you want to to introduce ANY changes to its software, I am going to be extremely skeptical about adopting them on my node. You're not just experimenting with adding features to another app on my phone; you're asking to rebuild my lifeboat with my family on it. I need to see extremely compelling evidence for why these changes are necessary, and extremely compelling explanations for why they do not pose any risks.
Like most bitcoiners, I have been harassed and hounded for years by BIP300's well-funded cringe marketing machine, but the more I look into it, the less convincing it is. Nothing in the motivation seems necessary or even useful. I simply don't care about "killing shitcoins" nor do I see any value from adding any of their features to bitcoin, since I know their features are just vaporware to promote ponzis. A significant number of plausible risks are waved away with cavalier indifference. It somehow fixes all problems and ends all trade-offs. And its promoters have more red flags than a Soviet parade: a history of questionable judgments on bitcoin issues; funding from shitcoiners responsible for the most serious attacks on bitcoin, like Garzik, Ver, and Brekken; the strong support of countless other shitcoiners; and worst of all, the resort to ridiculous fear tactics and the insistence that bitcoin is in a dangerous crisis which only BIP300 can fix.
Bitcoin is permissionless, so i cannot stop you from doing sidechains. Liquid, RSK, and RGB are doing something similar and I simply don't care. But if you need me to do anything with my node to accommodate you, the answer is going to be a very firm no.
Not many of us who live in the United States needed bitcoin to save our family from hyperinflation but that time might be coming. We seem to be more focused on price rather than performance or speed rather than security, or self interest rather than serving others. Saif is a breath of fresh air who speaks his mind which is backed by experience and evidence. I think we need more PhDβs in common sense and courage and saif has his degree in both and I am working on mine. Thank you saif for leading by example keep up the great work
I get gorgeous ladies from all over the world DM me on multiple platforms and at 66 years of age I am definitely a frog. One of the prettiest ladies turned out to be a bot and probably most of them are AI fake ladies or spoofs of the real person. Plus I am really busy working to help others and thinking that I am a prince to far younger women is detrimental to what I really want to do. I love beauty but I crave intelligence far more and my passion is to serve those less fortunate and to fight for my kids and grandkids and for their generation. There are not a lot of women my age developing on freedom tech or learning the intricacies of nodes, mining, algorithms, and such so hopefully I am safe or at least safer but I have to keep a careful eye not to run after pleasure. Great advice
Forward
In a world where belief systems often define the cores of societies, it becomes paramount to navigate the intricate web of terminologies, doctrines, and traditions with a discerning lens. "Broken Christianity" embarks on a daring expedition to delve deeply into the cavernous gaps and fissures that seem to have encroached upon the very foundations of Christian faith. A beacon in the dense fog of misconceptions, this book aims to light the path to a deeper understanding, fostering a faith that is both robust and nuanced.
In the course of this journey, one of the critical dialogues that this book engenders is around the entity often referred to as 'The Bible'. To the casual observer, this might seem like a unified book, a consolidated anthology of divine revelations and mandates that guide the beliefs and actions of millions. Yet, upon closer scrutiny, it reveals itself to be a complex tapestry woven from myriad threads of history, poetry, prophecy, law, and personal testimonies. It is a confluence of diverse voices that narrate not just a celestial doctrine, but also the human experiences and the historical contexts in which they were enunciated.
Through the chapters of "Broken Christianity", we strive to debunk the misconception that the Bible functions as a monolithic entity, bearing the weight of an unerring divine word that mandates unequivocal obedience. This journey is a pursuit of truth, sifting through the sands of time to uncover the individual voices and testimonies that resonate through the ages, preserving their authenticity and the human touch that crafted them.
At the center of this discourse is the examination of the phrase 'God's word', a term that has been wielded to assert the infallibility and divine authority of the entire corpus. This investigation explores the nuances of inspiration and authorship, questioning the blanket categorization of every word as a divine edict. It is an endeavor to reclaim the human elements, the personal testimonies and narratives that have been eclipsed in the broader canvas of divine attribution.
As we venture further, we shall question the established notions of 'inspiration', a term that has often been utilized to bridge gaps in understanding and assert divine sanction where the original authors indicated none. This pursuit is not a rebellion, but rather an endeavor to restore authenticity, to respect the true essence of these narratives, valuing them not just as divine edicts but as vital pieces of history, personal narratives, and testimonies that offer rich insights into the human and divine interplay.
"Broken Christianity" beckons its readers to embark on this voyage with an open heart and a discerning mind, to foster a faith that is both reasoned and genuine. It is a call to sift through the layers of time and tradition, to unearth the precious gems of truth that lie therein.
As you turn these pages, may you find not just arguments and insights, but a pathway to a faith that is rejuvenated, authentic, and resilient. A faith that honors not just the divine, but the human spirit that has tirelessly sought to understand, document, and commune with it.
Welcome to a journey of rediscovery, of unveiling truths and fostering a richer, more nuanced understanding of a faith that has shaped the lives of millions over centuries. Welcome to "Broken Christianity".
I would say a minimum of $1000 per month as a base salary type of agreement with the ability to earn more with creative and innovative posts that benefit the desired goal so that everyone wins. Thatβs priceless and encourages innovative and creative thought. I designed and am the founder of Twitter fundraising and NOSTR fundraising along with FAAST Fundraising as a Service Technologies. I would do it for the right purpose the right cause since I am doing similar right now. Thatβs how I might position it so it was a tweet and a snort and a post to linked in and Facebook which can happen simultaneously. Something along these lines with collaboration on a desired goal that drives people to the content because of truth and transparency.
Working on a marketplace app for NOSTR