time for a different web. this one sucks hard.
Zatim je CR porad nejlepsi z nejhorsiho na starym kontinentu... uvidime, jak dlouho to vydrzi
GM! Last week, Chainalysis claimed that Syrian rebels used cryptocurrency to finance its operations leading up to the toppling of the Assad regime.
We identified one of the addresses referenced in Chainalysis' report: it received a total of $807 USD.
Across the Telegram Group we identified, we found that participants had raised around $13,000 USD since November 27th via USDT – it may be arguable whether this amount contributed significantly to terrorist financing within the country.
But here's what's even more interesting:
Chainalysis claims that an OFAC sanctioned btc address shared mutual consolidation addresses with donation campaigns operating on Tron – a technical impossibility, leading us to believe that Chainalysis broadly simplified its depiction of events.
While Chainalysis' report claims to look at funding leading up to and following the events of December 8th, the identified OFAC sanctioned address last transacted in August 2021.
Why does this matter?
Chainalysis, as the primary Government contractor for blockchain surveillance, holds vast influence with both the Government and the public on the perception of btc.
Without regulatory oversight of the technologies Chainalysis uses and the methodologies it applies, the public has no opportunity to fact check whether what the contractor claims accurately reflects reality.
If we want to have an honest discussion on terrorist financing on bitcoin, blockchain surveillance firms need to be held to scientific standards and a minimum degree of transparency in their operations – otherwise, we run the risk of designing policy based on the claims of for-profit surveillance firms that can hardly be held accountable.
Updated story: https://www.therage.co/chainalysis-claims-cryptocurrency-funds-syrias-hts-2/
First "proof" that onchain analysis is just a big fraud. They know nothing.
Can't do, my furniture wouldn't fit in corolla when I'm selling it. again 😂
Funny thing is that it's probably start9, umbrel, etc. devs who decide.
ona je nejaka? ja ji teda vestil z TA, ale daily DCA menit stejne nebudu.
I don't think so. If this was true, they will all be in ether or other shitcoin already.
They like the cap.
Tak vlhkej sen jsou e-faktury (uz nyni povinne minimalne v nemecku a polsku afaik).
Prvne to ma byt povinne pro zahranicni obchod potom i vnitrni.
Vláda: Nebudeme zvyšovat daně.
huge difference between what users think thay want and what they really want.
I understand that you want gifs 😂 But you need to understand that if it's that easy to do, it would have been done already.
25+ years in the business and rarely saw a good idea from an "user". Businesses tend to generate good use cases. Let the devs handle the implementation.
Money talk. Pay someone to do the job or settle.
