my point being it's not the sexuality of the pole dance that's an issue.
but of course you're not gonna agree.
nothing evil about sexuality
but raping children is evil
so my hospital has a metal detector and security guards checking peeps bags at the main entrance as of this week
wtf
also the rear entrance (also public) doesn't even have a security guard
psyop much?
i freaking hate this BBC weather
have blocked ♾️ times
goodness is dangerous
which is why we need men getting comfortable with confrontation
cool heads and steady hearts win the day
Probably a result of them being responsible peeps in a broken system
I guarantee if this was enacted then the majority of those folks would own land. And be useful on it.
Big centralized govts doesn’t like land owners, inheritance; essentially, anything that causes you to need it less.
nostr:note1mjyrnd0gq0n3r2ejuqzuuawdttuwmtyrk63g74h3ke0dte7wp5psgh73l4 This. Assuming ignorance seems to be a problem here on Nostr. Especially among the ladies.
slow is safe
keep up the good work
#ozempicispoison
Wyner ignores the fact that the people actually killed are reported with different time delays, depending on many circumstances. And even worse: he does so implicitly without an explanation.
He states that “There should be days with twice the average or more and others with half or less.” But why? He gives no reason for this statement. Actually, admits that he does not know: “Unfortunately, verified control data is not available to formally test this conclusion”.
And still, without reliable justification, he claims that “the details of the daily counts render the numbers suspicious.”
If you look at the numbers, it’s very clear that they update fatalities faster than the update #women or #children (and they don’t specify #men, that is just (#fatalities – #women-#children)). On some days fatalities update but there is no change in the #w or #c; on other days the increase in (#w+#c) exceeds the increase in #f.
In other words, in the conditions of war, it is hard to get information. The Gazan Ministry of Health (GMH) makes a list of the name and ID # of every identifiable death; Israel maintains the registry of ID #’s so GMH can’t fake that. That’s why their numbers come out accurate.
But in real time, they may get a number of fatalities from a hospital and get the names, which allow identification of #w or #c, only later, maybe much later. And if they get the list of names, they have to go through the registry to determine who is a child or an adult, and maybe for ambiguous names who is a woman or a man, and that probably takes time too. So #w and #c get updated with arbitrary lags, sometimes multiple days worth may suddenly get updated at once. So looking at day-by-day movements of these #’s is meaningless.
I’ll add two other things. First, he says there is no correlation between increment in #women and increment in #children, just like this gentleman (https://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2024/03/08/a-note-on-how-the-gaza-ministry-of-health-fakes-casualty-numbers) showed that there is no correlation between increment in #fatalities and time. But if you look at the cumulative #women vs the cumulative #children, you get perfect correlation, R^2=0.99 (I checked), just like he finds perfect correlation between cumulative #fatalities and time.
Second, for his day-by-day anticorrelation between women and men: because they don’t specify men, only #w and #c, and because they may update in bunches, when there is an update of a lot of women, it will look like there’s not many men (i.e. change in fatalities – change in (women + children) is small, or even negative). When there’s an update where they don’t know the identities so it looks like there’s no increase in the #women, it will look like there’s a big increase in men – all the fatalities will appear to be men. So that’s why you get an anticorrelation between #women & #men.
Shame on PU for mindlessly repeating propaganda.
i don't think anyone was arguing that this is a prohibition of bitcoin…
but it might as well be
i hear you. very good points. i don't think "slow tech" (buggy, candles) is the same as "centralized tech" or "expensive tech" so I don't think the analogy works to illustrate your points.
I'd counter that lightning is fast but to make it useable in the real world fees must go down…and that was your point about WU
also you keep moving the goalpost 🤙plz don't
ok gotcha
i don't think horse and buggy analogy / candlelight works lol
also you can't build a business for every single population in the world.