Avatar
Charlie Andrys
899ab335d3b087f50259f9dc29c8760f0a8887135fc2705b482218f53408a852
“But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.” — Matthew 6:33

MSCI is considering excluding companies from its indexes if digital assets make up more than half of their balance sheet.

70%+ ($3.7B) of MSCI's assets are classified as “intangible” (goodwill and other intangible assets).​

Ironic that the “intangible” digital assets being targeted are exponentially more liquid, observable, and tradeable than “goodwill and other intangible assets.”

REITs hold real estate.

Timber companies hold timber.

Gold miners hold gold.

Oil and gas companies hold oil and gas.

No one calls them “funds.”

They are widely accepted as operating companies.

Yet 54% of MSCI Inc.’s balance sheet assets are goodwill.

By that logic, should MSCI be considered a goodwill “fund”?

Do you hear how absurd that sounds?

1. High asset concentration does not make a company a fund.

Many operating companies are naturally asset-concentrated by design. REITs hold real estate. Timber firms hold timber. Oil and gas companies hold hydrocarbons. Gold miners hold gold. None of these are treated as investment funds or excluded from major equity indices simply because of balance sheet composition.

2. A fixed percentage threshold is arbitrary and unworkable.

Using a 50% asset test tied to volatile assets creates instability. Asset values fluctuate, accounting treatments differ, and companies could move in and out of index eligibility without any change in their underlying business operations. That distorts index construction and undermines consistency.

3. This approach injects subjective policy judgments into index construction.

Index providers are meant to reflect market reality neutrally, not decide which assets are acceptable to hold. Singling out Bitcoin while ignoring identical balance-sheet logic applied elsewhere breaks long-standing indexing principles and erodes confidence in benchmark neutrality.

$MSTR is not a fund.

It is an operating company.

And balance sheet composition alone does not change that.

“Deflation is the natural state of a free market.

And only #Bitcoin can measure it.”

— nostr:nprofile1qqsg86qcm7lve6jkkr64z4mt8lfe57jsu8vpty6r2qpk37sgtnxevjcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqyw8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctvfkg4t5

Bitcoin doesn’t need to become a day-to-day medium of exchange to succeed.

Hal Finney understood this very early. He wrote that Bitcoin transactions might be rare, with most activity happening on higher layers or through intermediaries. Individuals would hold Bitcoin as a reserve asset, while institutions would handle payments and credit on top of it. Bitcoin, in his eyes, functioned as base-layer money, not retail payment rails.

Strategy’s preferred equity products effectively treat Bitcoin as a digital reserve asset. Bitcoin sits at the base, while these credit instruments are built on top. Most users never touch the base layer, just like most people never move physical gold. People forget the credit market for gold was almost 3x larger than the market for gold itself.

Lately I’ve been thinking more about the idea of true transactional digital money.

A product like $STRC is about 5x overcollateralized with Bitcoin, which keeps volatility relatively low, though it isn’t perfect. It doesn’t hold a strict $100 peg well enough to be used as a true transactional asset, but it’s far more stable than holding raw Bitcoin directly.

This is where I think institutions eventually come in. This part is speculative, but it’s easy to imagine Strategy offering institutions like JPMorgan or Morgan Stanley a savings-account-style product with $STRC as the underlying plumbing.

$STRC currently yields around 10.75%, which gives banks plenty of margin. They take deposits, allocate into $STRC, offer customers a high-yield, zero-volatility savings account, and earn the spread. Strategy, in turn, uses those funds to buy more Bitcoin and further overcollateralize the credit instruments built on top.

Digital money doesn’t need high transaction volume at the base layer. It needs credibility, scarcity, and final settlement. Bitcoin provides those properties. Everything else can scale above it.

Bitcoin succeeds not by replacing Visa, but by replacing the monetary foundation those systems sit on.

#Bitcoin, #Gold, & #Silver all going parabolic is not a sign of a healthy monetary system…

https://blossom.primal.net/c839cb9f3869cb75187169b4761ab20bbacf56c8d5d708989b210cb4e6dbebd8.mov

#Bitcoin #Gold #Silver going parabolic is not a sign of a healthy monetary system..

https://blossom.primal.net/d8b53977596791a735b8c758f2f1abc74ac9fcde7ba2f064f181277c212bf5a4.mov

We love because he first loved us.

— 1 John 4:19

Replying to Avatar Soak Quest

Growing an account on Nostr is a manual process.

There's no algo that consistently displays your posts to people who don't follow you. Everything on Nostr is earned. Here's what you should do:

1) ENGAGE: No one is going to see your posts when you have a small account. To get people to notice you without an algo, you need to comment on their posts. Engagement is low for most people, so your effort in this will go further than on other platforms.

2) ZAPVERTIZE: You could run a big campaign, but you find success if you use your zap message to make it clear what you do. Give people a reason to click on your profile. Your Zap Message is more visible than any comment. If you're the top zap, your message will be seen by everyone who sees that post on some clients. Hunt for low cost, valuable opportunities here.

3) SPONSOR AN INFLUENCER: There are have's and have not's when it comes to reach on Nostr without as much middle ground or social mobility. If you are a business, I recommend sending product to someone with a bigger reach to repost your posts. Value for Value and Repost Culture are core to Nostr and there's no Algo score that you would be disrupting for them. Getting reposted by a big account consistently will take you far.

Otherwise the advice is the same for most social media growth. There's no substitute for consistent content production.

There are hacks, but overnight success doesn't exist on Nostr. The beauty is that the results from all the work you put in, you own.

Here is my comment!

A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed.

— Proverbs 11:25

Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

— Luke 6:38

Maybe hatred is a little excessive. 😂 It just seems like you’re dunking on Strategy and/or the people who follow it.