the idea that the same people who gave us the forever wars are dumbshits who just don't get bitcoin is played out we have to assume they get it by now, its not that hard to grok
of course they get it
of course they're doing their best to fvck it up so it fails and/or subvert it to their own ends
but i dont think that fact makes it less better money
we just have to act accordingly
are trying their best to fuck it up
satsmcd your nostr schtick is usually dumb sarcastic takes to razz people up is this another one? or this something you actually believe
didnt even know it was a possible feature in amethyst. in theory could run on a Play enabled profile in graphene if really want translations
are the outboxes ready?
Linux operating systems
(a lot of cloud infrastructure runs on Linux so we assume this attack wasn't targeting the tiny percentage of people who run Linux on their laptop...)
OK got off my backside and looked up some docs and there can be spend conditions
yeah right. so can there be any conditions on when the mint redeems, otherwise because its a bearer token its just whoever holds it has full control
there probably shouldn't be any conditions on redemption π€
i know absolutely nothing about either just was listening to someone talk about op codes the other day and they went on and on....
id rather play with something and test it in a living system than talk about what might happen if we changed an op code
if we wanted, could we build #ecash covenants? or are there any other working #bitcoin systems with covenants already?
that has to be the thing that annoys me the most - people write a 'spec' for some new op code and then everyone seems to just sit around and talk about it.
it's cypherpunks write code
not cypherpunks discuss it on podcasts
but...
i do think your logic is right:
if esg is mainstream, and ukraine defense is mainstream,
then mainstream esg theme should include defense of ukraine (shouldn't it?)
im not a logician or philosopher though, but yeah i think you have found another logical fallacy in mainstream narratives
I'll have a go
the bank has some demographic data on you that groups you within (probably younger?) set of people, who have a higher chance of saying yes, to investing in that type of fund
its not about esg or promoting any agenda its about the woman at the bank and the bank itself meeting sales targets
because not everyone is the same, there's plenty of other capital from other groups to invest in weapons
either way scale of borrowing is outrageous
is that also to do with expectations of cuts coming soon? but values go up when rates go down π€
if im really honest thoigh im kinda jealous of the people who give zero fucks walking around in them in public
because we get rid of spam?
its wild some dudes can't comprehend others lived experience
how can you not have noticed the bullshit on other SM platforms and you think #nostr different and special because of keys or some shit?
?cid=6c09b9522sqf42x9n5t008iku0wodekkwfed76bjku49mub3&ep=v1_internal_gif_by_id&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

