Hey nostr:nprofile1qqs2vrneurk665gq6a2rke572y7mc8ppwr5wnd60mw8fwxharc8xsycpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszymhwden5te0wp6hyurvv4cxzeewv4ej75ra92t ever seen one of these get stuck?

Don’t be obtuse.

I didn’t say he has ultimate authority. I said some responses attempt to be teaching him. Based on what they are saying, it’s painfully obvious that they do not know who Matt is. They just want to give an opinion, even if it isn’t well thought out or relevant or accurate.

And here you are, slipping in some pity logic heuristic like it’s a mic drop.

I think it’s funny that some responses here seem to be an attempt to teach Matt Corallo about bitcoin.

This you Flash?

That went way over my head. Forgive me… it’s a relaxing Sunday.

This is sick. You are promoting Jazeera propaganda.

Referring to Hamas, Gaza’s government, as “the resistance”? Are you fucking kidding me?

Referring to the Israeli hostages as “prisoners”?

Are you fucking kidding me?

I’m done being polite, Flash. Your brain has turned to mush and you are spreading bullshit.

Kumquats would like a word, Daniel,

Laughable

Flash, sometimes people are calling you out on your biases, which you fail to examine. Sadly, you’ve chosen to double down on misinformation in Gaza, turning a blind eye to other sources. And now, most recently, you’re promoting ayatollahs and dictators. Not a good look.

The “best” information lately appears to be sprinkled with lots of Russian propaganda.

* Khamenei.

(Damn autocorrect and speech to text!)

The president of Iran does not lead the country as Tucker states. Perhaps, instead, he should interview Supreme Leader Khomeini.

You are going completely off the rails here, Flash.

He makes it looks so easy, it’s disgusting. That camera work (and editing is really good, as well).

Hey Jameson. Bro.

I’m the head of marketing or a sales intern (my boss hasn’t decided) at DogShit Creatives. I don’t know shit about fuck so they said I was perfect for this position.

I didn’t do *any* background on you or your company, despite both having an internet presence for a decade and, who, looks like you actually write a blog or something? That’s cool.

I think we could totally help YOU with your business’s image because, well, it’s all about image, amirite? Here’s some made up numbers and some other dogshit people we’ve assisted in selling their dogshit.

Call me?

Thanks Dude,

Seems like 360 flip to me….

Unsure

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqstq73lrqtyu49e6g0s3va0wcrfh22hw9we80g3zvwsshc3z7y7t8qfv2e8q

This was your ONLY message to me, actually, and I’ve made many attempts to engage with you politely.

I’m not asking you to cater to me. Rather, if your goal is to expose human suffering, I’m asking you to not be so narrow-minded and, yes, ignorant. You could have, for example, posted about the jihadist suicide bomber that killed 25 people in a church in Damascus.

Your anti-Israel bias is obvious and without a single message against Hamas, and it has become obvious that you support their actions. That’s sickening. There is blame to go around here, and you are only pointing it one way, completely ignoring the evils Hamas perpetrates against the citizens of Gaza. Or the 13 million displaced people and tens of thousands dead in Sudan just this year alone.

Evidently, I care more about them than you do.

“It’s important that we acquire it so we can have influence on the network.”

That, right there, should raise alarm bells for any ETH bag holders. But it won’t. Because they don’t understand the value of a monetary network that is permissionless, censorship-resistant, and immutable (among other benefits of bitcoin’s PoW).

Also very interesting that the hosts don’t push back on Tom’s value pitch the way that frequently do with other guests that discuss bitcoin. This segment is, effectively, nothing more than a promotional advertisement for centralized control and the legacy financial system’s desperate attempt to catch up with bitcoin’s decentralized and distributed monetary revolution.

We can certainly disagree. No harm in that. However, how are you interpreting what I said as “downplaying a woman’s ability to create life”?

This is really interesting, because the clip from Michelle Obama explicitly explains how the entire reproductive system is important to a woman’s own life, throughout her life, and not *just* her ability to create a life. She’s literally saying that even if all you want is for a woman to make babies, you should take care of her entire reproductive system and general health.

Anyway, you seem to be elevating one function of a woman’s reproductive system over others. And, you know, that’s sort of EXACTLY the critical point she’s making.

A bit of unsolicited advice: you may want to think more about “what a woman’s purpose is.” If you think it’s just to create life, then you are not treating any woman as an individual person, just a functionary. I don’t know how else to put this, but that’s really sad. I hope you don’t treat your mom, sister, girlfriend/wife, or daughter as if they exist simply to serve one specific reproductive function. That’s a really poor way of interacting with the world and 50% of the people in it.

But, yeah, you do you, I guess. The proof of whether your view is correct will be revealed over the course of your life in whether women find it’s worth their time to connect with you on a deep and meaningful level.