Avatar
BITwise 🐳 >>= RIGHTish
8e27ffb5c9bb8cdd0131ade6efa49d56d401b5424d9fdf9a63e074d527b0715c
Music is culture. Culture is worth saving. Save Music Do #Demu

I think one major hurdle most people don't truly understand is that Money and Value are not the same. One attempts to represent the other.

Long hypothetical incoming but I think its worth the read if you want a framework to help illustrate to normies and arm yourself with another intellectual tool.

I often get asked, how do you know the price of bitcoin will go up if it just sits there and does nothing? It's simple, because the value of bitcoin is ever increasing in a world that's valued using an inflationary money. Let me explain. Follow me on this journey.

To preface, we will be speaking generally. Yes you can find a million exceptions and yes there are a million exceptions. But we have to generalize and boil things down to basics to illustrate the point. Let's go.

The amount of value an item has may differ from one person to another. When determining its calue to me, I might ask myself... do i like meat? Am I hungry? I may value the same burger more or less than the next person. If burger stand owner values it high they'll sell it at a higher cost (money). That determines if it's worth it for me to buy that burger. If the value (to me) of that burger is lower than the cost, I'll buy it.

While the cost of something may fluctuate over time (and with inflation ingrained in our society, everyone can understand that costs naturally go up over time. What they dont truly grasp is why.) Value on the other hand, is somewhat subjective from person to person but all else held equal, the value of something will stay the same for any one person, always (remember I said all else held equal and we're making generalizations here).

Money is simply a representation of value but since value is subjective, money is not always a fixed 1:1 representation of value for every person. That ratio fluctuates from person to person but I generally value a hot dog as much today as I do tomorrow. Yeah I might be more hungry today vs tmrw but I'm not going to ask the hot dog man to sell it cheaper tmrw just cause I'm not as hungry. That's nonesense.

If anything we can assume a hot dog will cost more tmrw because of inflation. The value of that hot dog is still the same. It still eases my hunger, it's still got meat and bread. Value stays the same while costs (money) changes.

Ok enough food examples. Let's talk assets. You with me so far?

The value of the dollar is ever decreasing because of fiat money printing (no one can deny money printing and inflation). Comparing one against the other will always come out with Bitcoin as the winner long term. Again, why?

Imagine this scenario: in a world there exists only three people. One person (A) holds $100k of cash. Another (B) holds 100 bitcoins. And the third person (C) has a house. They live in a closed ecosystem, nothing really changes in this world and don't they don't generate or lose any additional value.

Let's assume the value each person places on each of these 3 things are equal. Because of this, the entirety of what one person owns can be traded against the entirety of what the other person owns.

Time goes on and they're all happy. One day, greed seeps in...

Let's assume the C is an appraiser and arbitrarily decides his house is now worth double. Or he just decides to be greedy and lists his house for $200k. Whatever doesn't matter why. Nothing changes with B, he's just holding his 100 bitcoins.

If A wants to buy C's house he has to double his money! OK let's pretend like A also owns a printer and decides to print another $100k. The Fed makes up their own rules so why can't he?!

Poor Mr. B right? What a sucker. Everyone got double values and hes still holding 100 bitcoins. What a sucker! Wrong.

You see, the value of items don't change when you suddenly apply a different cost to it (generally speaking). A house that's twice as expensive still has the same utility value as that same house just priced differently. The true total resources and net worth of this world never actually changes.

A can now buy C's house for $200k, so he does. Remember, value hasn't changed, only prices (aka money). All 3 items continue to have the same value, but because of greed, the money has doubled and the price of the house has doubled. The intrinsic values still stay the same. A still holds the same value as B holds the same value as C.

Since the true value of the house nor the Bitcoin has changed, B can now exchange his 100 bitcoins for that house. And wait a second, isn't that house now worth $200k (double)? Yes. The price of B's original 100 bitcoins are now worth $200k simply by buying and holding and doing nothing and letting the rest of the world play fiat games. This is what's happening in our current reality at a base level.

Let the greedy fucks play their games. I don't care cause I'm hodling Bitcoin.

This is why Bitcoin will win.

Thanks for listening to my Ted talk. Get home safe. Stack sats.

That first guy was the warmup. That last guy was def final boss mode.

Brent + Bit Ish = Tag Team Purple Pill Squad

Replying to Avatar David Wetton

Why, in my view, the real Bitcoin President is Robert F Kennedy Jr.

Comparing the two speeches, RFK Jr. Vs Trump, was Men Vs Boys.

I've posted a link to RFK Jr.'s speech below.

It's worthy of your time.

For those who know Bitcoin, RFK Jr. is to the political arena what Michael Saylor is to the corporate arena for Bitcoin.

RFK Jr. clearly understands Bitcoin, the Bitcoin community and its strategic importance.

For example, to grasp the work of Jason Lowry on 'Softwar' is a sign of someone who's put in the hours on his Bitcoin research.

By contrast, Trump gave a rambling, disjointed speech, of someone who'd recently picked up the brief and not understood it.

He made some good points in amongst his verbiage, which were poorly communicated and frankly lacked coherence.

He didn't even mention the one million Bitcoin Treasury, which would have brought the house down in Nashville?

Whoever prepared him should be fired, and Trump himself needs to take responsibility for thinking he could ramble on and still charm the Bitcoin audience.

RFK Jr. was punchy, concise and what he said fully deserved to be on the Bitcoin stage and was worthy of the audience's attention.

Kamala Harris didn't show up and rightly so, as I doubt she understands Bitcoin, and the record of the Democratic administration has demonstrated their lack of understanding and antagonism towards Bitcoin.

She has a short window to rapidly get up to speed with Bitcoin and make a difference, but I'm not holding my breath. I hope she proves me wrong.

The Trump administration will no doubt be good for Bitcoin, but the real Bitcoin President for me is Robert F Kennedy Jr.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssYCRVpzcxc

The conference isn't letting in lighters or tapes into the nakamoto stage area. 5 inch lockback pocket knives are fine though. Ask me how I know.

I originally built that machine in 2004. It had a floppy disk drive. I've still got that drive in a box somewhere πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ probably... by 2015 the only original part was the case. I figure it's survived so long, would be a shame to let it go to waste.