Yes, it's also producing said manure.

Also, if he's satisfied with what the algo provides, no need to do anything.

Ano, je to takový drobný neúmyslný bonus. :D

You have to actively and consistently break out of your regular patterns if you don't want the algorithm to force feed you a select few topics or push you down certain rabbit holes.

Tak celkově válka proti drogám je píčovina.

Referencing an external clock such as a block height does not solve the underlying issue.

Looking at the NIP0, the note id is also derived from the timestamp. The client can insert any timestamp, but it cannot publish the same note with different timestamps and the same id. This solves the consistency among relays issue, but does not solve the problem of a client faking the timestamp.

What could kind of solve this, is if all relays provided "received_at" field, which works similarly to created, except that it would be created on the relay. That would be a relay specific publish timestamp.

If you needed a global one, you cannot have an absolutely reliable one, but you can have a good enough one, if you just took the earliest received_at timestamp accessible on the relays you have access to. That one may change though depending on which relays you fetch the note from.

That's where I found it. Should have known. :D

Not sure about antedating or postdating the note, but you have to consider, what is actually the time of publication. In a centralized service. it's either the time the client sends the request, or more likely the time, when the server receives the request. You can however publish the same note for example a week apart to two different relays. What is the time of publication of that note in that case?

You could argue that it would be the first publishing recorded by any relay anywhere. Then the question is, how would the other relays know that?

Found in the wild today

https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_3024899875814379701694798603.webp

Now you get to be blamed for both the frontend and the backend, yay. :D

Yeah, since the previous regime, we most certainly did. But actually things got a little tighter a couple years back. Used to be that up to 15gs of weed was still a misdemeanor, not it's down to 10.

You can if you think of the risk of a fine as a thing being legal for a fee. You must not distribute it to anybody, you must keep it below 5 plants and all you are risking is a fine.

Then there is this thing, that they do have to prove "naplnění skutkové podstaty trestného činu", essentially, that a crime has actually happened. You are not allowed to proactively grow marijuana, but if it somehow appears in your garden, you are under no obligation to get rid of it. The crime happens when they can either prove that you are proactively growing it (for example by watering it) , or the moment you harvest the plant and start drying it.

Unless they can prove the crime, there is no crime. Still, it's better to just keep it under 5 plants and possibly pay a fine if your neighbors hate you, which is still way below the market price of the product.

Think positive. Could have been an anti personnel landmine

That's not actually true. It's true in Slovakia and Austria. In Czechia, you may face a fine for growing up to five plants of weed, but it's a misdemeanor, not a criminal offense and there is no harsher punishment than the fine. (unless they can prove distribution or other illegal activities )

That's what shitposts are for. It's easy to post a meme.

Any Blackadder fans here? What's your favourite episode or quote?

#shitpost #memes #blackadder

https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_8935206110446968311694736974.webp

I mean, that the more I understand a *typical* woman, the more it hits me, that that is something I am not willing to deal with. And quite frankly the life of a hermit/bachelor is even more suboptimal.

It is also depressing as it trashes my previous apparently overly optimistic expectstions of the womankind in general.

Interesting, I'd say, it's the exact opposite for me. I wish it wasn't the case tho. It is depressing to be proven right in this regard.

It's the other way around. Men usually don't get compliments and when they do it's often in a situation where sexual tension is already abnormally high, or the intention is to increase it.

The other, arguably more prevalent alternative is, that a request for a favor will follow shortly after the compliment.

I'd suggest, that that is a nice manifestation of the exposure bias.

On the few occasions men do get compliments, the end result often is sex or at the very least increased sexual tension.

úúú, jaký je klíč?