people can't imagine how unbelievably rich we would be if the government didn't have so many regulations, inflation, taxes
it's not like wealth would double or triple, that is nothing
the amount of innovation, investment and just raw work that is hampered by the government is so gigantic I can't even begin to spell it
yes, what I'm saying is that there shouldn't be, at least not among the smart ones
expecting governments to not get always worse over time is the real fairy tale
but are you saying anarchism is unlikely to happen or that even if it happens it will be flawed?
care to explain what you mean?
I don't get how right wingers and bitcoiners see everything that is happening and don't become anarchists instantly
but he saved free speech!
Switching to another platform won't fix shit. Switching to a protocol-based approach might. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfJwezWWu08
someone has to tell him
https://reason.com/podcast/2025/12/19/is-it-time-to-break-up-big-tech/
listen to this if you want to hear clueless economists talking about how big tech protects our privacy
I wouldn't be so sure it will come
imagine asking every single nostr app in existence to support a dnsless relay?
so I had to have seen the original image in order to understand
I don't understand it, care to rxolain?
that's kinda stupid isn't it? people can spam infinite votes
sure, try convincing your mother first that she needs a server and a domain name
this made me realize how good nip 17 actually is, and it actually works in practice it looks like
what about the dns?
for all the talk about AI I really don't see more good software being created
everybody seems to be working at roughly the same speed
it is
imagine an entire industry and academic research field fully dedicated to break bitcoin
seriously, there isn't a single other use case
Status of quantum computer development.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13xGo_JYAvGEkrlBxhJUHzhK3RuP8657M/view?usp=drivesdk
fud > hype > tons of funding > nostr posts spreading the evil narrative
A Bluffer's Guide to PQC Digital Signatures: (Source: Bill Buchanan)
- In digital signing, a private key is used to sign the hash of a message, and the associated public key will verify it.
- RSA, ECDSA and EdDSA are all broken by Shor's algorithm.
- For digital certificates, RSA is currently the most popular method for public keys and signing.
- NIST-approved signatures are defined in FIPS 186-5 (Digital Signature Standard - DSS).
- NIST has defined that RSA, ECDSA and EdDSA will be deprecated in 2030, and disallowed from 2035.
- NIST have approved two main standards for FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) and FIPS 2025 (SLH-DSA).
- ML-DSA is based on the Dilithium method, and SLH-DSA is based on the SPHINCS+ method.
- SLH-DSA is a stateless hash method, and where there is no need to remember the previously used private keys.
- There are three levels of security of PQC signatures: Level 1 (128-bit equiv security), Level 3 (192-bit equiv security) and Level 5 (256-bit equiv security).
- ML-DSA is a lattice-based method. For 128-bit security, we have ML-DSA-44, for 192-bit, we have ML-DSA-65, and for 256-bit security, we have ML-DSA-87.
- SLH is a hash-based method. For 128-bit security, we have SLH-DSA-SHA2-128f, for 192-bit, we have SLH-DSA-SHA2-192f, and for 256-bit security, we have SLH-DSA-SHA2-256f. We can have SHA-2 or SHAKE as the hashing method (SHAKE is faster).
- With SLH-DSA, we can have a fast version, such as SLH-DSA-SHA2-256f, or a slower version, such as SLH-DSA-SHA2-256s.
- For ML-DSA-44, we have a 1,330-byte public key, a 2,602-byte private key, and a signature size of 2,420 bytes. Reasonable key sizes and reasonable signature size.
- For SLH-DSA-SHA2-128f, we have a 33 public key, a 64-byte private key, and a signature size of 17,088 bytes. Small keys, large signature.
- ML-DSA is generally much faster than SLH-DSA, but SLH-DSA has strong security guarantees.
- ML-DSA and SLH-DSA are now supported in OpenSSL 3.5.
- NIST have also approved FIPS 206 (Falcon) as a standard, and which has smaller key and signature sizes and but is slower than ML-KEM.
- In Round 2 for Additional Signatures, NIST is assessing other methods for future signatures, and include Multivariate Cryptography (MC), and Unbalanced Oil and Vinegar (UOV), MPC-in-the-Head, and Code-based methods.
- The XMSS methods allow for stateful signature replacements, but these often require hardware-based controls and can be slow.
- There are some worries about the long-term security of lattice-based methods, but hash-based ones generally have few worries about their long-term security.
- ML-DSA is generally as fast for key generation and signing as elliptic curve methods, and much faster than RSA.
- With PQC signing, we can have pre-hash sign, and where we take the hash of the message and before feed it into the signature method. This has esser performance effect.
See them in action with OpenSSL 3.5 here:
Signature Generation: https://asecuritysite.com/openssl/mldsa_keygen
Certificate Generation: https://asecuritysite.com/openssl/mldsa_cert
fuck nist
nostr:npub1cgcwm56v5hyrrzl5ty4vq4kdud63n5u4czgycdl2r3jshzk55ufqe52ndy nostr:npub1m64hnkh6rs47fd9x6wk2zdtmdj4qkazt734d22d94ery9zzhne5qw9uaks I retract my recommendation, you shouldn't go on this fakecast
the guy is an asshole
you're not qualified to have a podcast, please go back to square 1
good morning
the idiotic dream of "everybody can be an influencer"
of course not
true
this is the basis of solid relationships
yes but also these follow packs are utterly meaningless
stop pushing slop to the guy
I got my part of the primal airdrop
can signers also authorize the relay an event is going to be published too? that would be useful
what exactly is happening? I see opinions but no description of the facts
are bluesky people having wrong opinions about charlie kirk and the platform is deleting those? who is unhappy? what are people thinking about the automodding? why are the opinions about charlie kirk much worse than whatever other opinions they had before?
are they interchangeable? they don't even go offline?
human memory is underrated
he said in the interview already what he thinks about micropayments
and he is right