stay small. depth not expanse. real value is not inflated by artificial assumptions of worth. it's what you have that's provable. everything else is pretend.
sounds destructive - define "better".
who's us?
you always know when i'm active online because i post my actual content manually, not a screenshot of physical exercise in a gym masquerading as "content" upload. and such. but hey. whatevs. i'll send a photo of real blue sky from my actual walk as proof of my real exercise if that's what you want. i don't count steps. 😏☀️
i don't agree the end of humanity is imminent. i think doomsday dramatics influence the fatalism perspective - and then no one seeks solutions. humans made ai. the actuality of the backend capability is not as smooth as the front end user may imagine. see zap.
only humans have hands is what i always say. 
buggy?
the assumption model does wacky things to people because they are placed in contexts which they are not really operating. people who assume others are running shadow campaigns or backend influence of candidates simply because of interaction is driven by the "information as profit" scheme of proof of stake. it's silly.
just because i interact with a politician doesn't preclude any support of influence - but that's all why i act in the open. there's no expectation my advice should be superior. it's freely given. those who operate as upload-only find this more difficult to navigate i believe, even if it's in the same sport. since there's no searchable proof.
regardless, myself and jack - as far as i know - only offer advisement. not paid influence or leverage. reciprocal only.
we gonna see - could always ask the twitter version if it's him with a screenshot. lmfao.