Avatar
Pete Winn 🔆
94215f42a96335c87fcb9e881a0bbb62b9a795519e109cf5f9d2ef617681f622
In it for the underlying freedom technology. Director Other Stuff, Former Product @. Stakwork & Fedi

Looking forward to the explosion 💥 of BSPs as a new business model :)

Going to be big. If you know, you know.

#[0]

AI but it's really just being used for interoperability between standards so we don't need political agreement on protocols anymore 😎

I think my favourite other stuff is market matching makers and takers

Now the only "experience" that matters is "chat" which is about as open source and fundamentally natural a UX as there could be.

Still there'll be a transition period, but that switch has been flipped.

It's controversial, but fundamentally you take an AI agent with plugs in and you ask it to do something for you.

You no longer give a shit how difficult that experience is.

UI/UX lost the battle in 2023 and is dead.

Discuss?

Also this is good for Bitcoin.

I'm finding this question very interesting to apply to user experience in general.

Suddenly it just doesn't matter if the UX is bad anymore, because it's actually the job of the AI agent to deal with it and they've got effe tibelu a 1000 years of human time to deal with it every time you ask a question :)

I like the grey. Feels like I need the tasche to go grey though to better match the beard

Replying to Avatar jack

Now that's blue steak

I was thinking more if we live in a world of always on autonomous agents. Are interactive protocols really that bad?

For instance do you need bolt12 if you can just ask you Bit-GPT to just "pay Dan 10,000 sats a month for the next year"

Does AI make interactive protocols for shared UTXO ownership more interesting 🤔