Avatar
pseudo~u *likes nostr already*
95c33bfbb96b0f463cb80f6f2e229ded74f36e9694e6b04dec5124e4ef6bde66
Peace, love, freedom. First freedom.. Maddie de Garay was a 12 year old in the trial for Pfizer's covid vaccine. Immediately after her second jab she had a severe reaction that has put her in a wheelchair ever since. Pfizer simply decreed that this was not an effect of the vaccine - even though this was in the trial whose purpose is literally to determine the vaccine's effects. The FDA and CDC would not even speak to Maddy's parents. They tried to convince them Maddy was crazy. There is no possible conclusion except that the vaccines were developed in bad faith, and the authorities - including any doctors who promoted the vaccines - cannot be trusted. Be in no doubt that they will kill your children if it suits them. Never forget, never forgive. https://fullmeasure.news/newest-videos/vaccine-trials

1) 0.3

2) 0.9 if you include a linked intel agency wilfully allowing it (dancing Israelis)

3) 1.0 if you mean anthropogenic dogma, because the only thing we really know is that climate always changes (we don't know how much change is normal)

4) 0.2

5) 0 (ask about gravity and the whole thing falls apart)

so 2.4

Today we are so powerful and knowledgeable, still we dont understand the full sense and interconnections of the universe. We probably will never know really whats happening here and we are limited in comprension by our human nature.

I think that the core of pretty all damage we can do to the ecosystem and to ourself is based on human hyperintervention on things.

If there is something about the climate bullshit I think could be true, is that a huge spike in the capacity of humans of modelling the world, in particular after the industrial revolutions, has caused and is causing some damages to ecosystem and humans themself.

Like, we become so powerful we can live in clean aseptic places -----> children developing deasease cause we actually didnt considered we need more contact with biodiversity and "dirt".

We can do multiple example of how high technical impact technologies, applied without cognition, that had a bad impact on people.

The actual climate histeria is actually a movement of high-technical hyperintervention on the ecosystem without a full understanding of whats happening. Its literally all the bad can human can do. They are double downing doing exactly what has historically caused problems to the ecosystems.

I'm for chirurgic, limited high technical interventions when there is an evident good outcome that justify all the potential badness that we are not considering we are causing.

Its like medicals: I'm for taking them when there's an obvious desease that can really hurt us, and we can get a huge benefit from taking a med; at least we will live to see the collateral effects in future.

Todays med histeria make people causing more damage that benefit to themself, taking pills like candies... and then, kids have suppressed immunitary system cause taking antibiotics on every little disease is not optimal....

Just let the market adjusts itself, whatever its happening today. Free markets made by free individuals recognizes bullshits very well.

yes unfortunately I think we're at the stage where even if there was some sort of genuine global emergency requiring a coordinated response, it would be impossible for our institutions to actually do anything - because they are so corrupted by this kind of anti realism.

even the climate stuff, if it were all true, the measures they propose couldn't possibly have any effect.

the problem is that none of the activists pushing this things care at all about the actual issues. they don't care about climate, trans people, Ukraine, respiratory viruses - all they care about is finding ways to bully and control people and raise their level in the herd.

yes.

and even the current temperatures they cite are usually from models that interpolate etc based on opaque assumptions.

and when you stop to think of it what does "global temperature" itself even means? it's not the average for the earth as that includes the molten core! so it's for the surface plus some slice of the atmosphere? the radiation temperature? it all becomes less and less meaningful, and more and more open to manipulation the more you think of it. the only measure that makes any kind of sense is total ocean energy, and nobody cares about that!

We have no idea what "normal" variation in global temperatures is - because all data before the last decade is massively smoothed.

So there is no grounds to say whether any recent increases (if you believe they are correctly reported) are abnormal.

https://open.substack.com/pub/irrationalfear/p/smoothing-the-past

Am I right in thinking primal doesn't support lists?

If so, any recommendations for desktop / browser clients that do support them? (I have nostrudel and think its great but a bit clunky or something for me..)

Thanks for any info..

i think its more that there aren't actually any real numbers, they're all basically imaginary

No, all media outlets report that voters understand free speech is dangerous and racist, and beg to be protected from it by their wise and benificient government.

Just time and the inevitable squeeze of censorship on all other communications.

It's completely impossible now for governments to avoid taking full control of social media (leaving aside the possibility if trump gets in). They are too committed and it makes too much sense for them.

When that happens nostr will be the only option for free information, just as bitcoin will be the only option for free economic exchange. I expect we'll see some major figure realise this and release content on nostr that cannot be shared any other way. Then they'll try to shut it down and when they fail it'll be all over.