Avatar
Patrick Schnitter
965aabb780384f6ff60a82ab3b480e5affbde71f0c769f7375f1c279477ed9b0
We are all Satoshi 🧔

Fully expect the US govt to sell more #BitcoinĀ  this week now that we’re over 30K. Hold onto your shorts. We will win long term.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Too many people have given Elon a pass. Don't give him a pass.

He's a marketer, not a founder or an engineer. He didn't found PayPal or Tesla; he bought into them early. He's good at selling narratives and equity valuation for perpetually unprofitable companies.

Everything for him is a narrative. His green revolution was a narrative to sell more cars and get more subsidies. His bitcoin purchase was to gain appeal among bitcoin/crypto people in a bull market. And he shilled doge like a dumbass. His SpaceX narrative is to get money from the government.

His rooftop solar thing was an outright scam; the technology isn't ready and went nowhere because of that. His full-self-driving-in-an-intermediate-term timeline was a scam, and is going nowhere because of that. He makes scams to draw people and capital in, because for him it's all about narratives and equity valuation.

And then he dug unproductive holes, suggested unproductive hyper-tubes, built meme flamethrowers, for what? It's a narrative, not a business. None of this is real productive shit to make peoples' lives better.

His latest "we need free speech" narrative was a scam too. He tapped into something real, which is what marketers do and why it kind of worked. Yes, we need free speech. Yes, Twitter had censorship issues. He saw that and jumped on it maliciously rather than productively.

But what did he replace it with? He replaced it with arbitrary journalist censorship about his private jet, arbitrary censorship of Substack, selective Twitter Files release, won't talk seriously about any of his China connections because Xi Jinping fucking owns him economically there like Jack Ma, has his balls firmly in his grasp, etc.

Elon's playing the narrative, the anti-woke meme of the day. He's a master meme-momentum-player. Don't fall for it.

Wow. Wonder what Cathie Wood would say to this šŸ¤”

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Back in the 1930s and 1940s, there were a lot of capital controls, lending restrictions, securities restrictions, etc. And it was for two different but intertwined reasons.

One obvious reason was that, among countries involved in trade wars or shooting wars, they wanted to reduce capital flows to the enemy.

A second reason was that, due to the war, sovereign debts became so high relative to GDP that they had to inflate away the debt, which was a form of default. It wasn't just 6102; it was a broad range of controls. Carmen Reinhart described it well as ā€œcreating a captive audienceā€ in an

IMF Working paper:

ā€œHigh public debt often produces the drama of default and restructuring. But debt is also reduced through financial repression, a tax on bondholders and savers via negative or belowmarket real interest rates. After WWII, capital controls and regulatory restrictions created a captive audience for government debt, limiting tax-base erosion. Financial repression is most successful in liquidating debt when accompanied by inflation. For the advanced economies, real interest rates were negative ½ of the time during 1945–1980. Average annual interest expense savings for a 12—country sample range from about 1 to 5 percent of GDP for the full 1945–1980 period. We suggest that, once again, financial repression may be part of the toolkit deployed to cope with the most recent surge in public debt in advanced economies.ā€

-IMF Working Paper No. 2015/007

Unfortunately, as most here know, both conditions are once again present in the 2020s. The US/Europe vs Russia/China contest is providing a useful excuse for governments to crack down on privacy, p2p exchange, money transfer, etc. Meanwhile, western governments have a similar sovereign debt problem that ultimately necessitates inflating the debt away.

Some of this Operation Chokepoint 2.0 stuff is just targeting scammy crypto companies and things like that. And the SEC enforcement actions are also going after crypto securities fraud and so forth. For bitcoiners, those things are not particularly relevant.

But under the surface, the bigger risk is all of the ongoing pressure on privacy, p2p, and the free flow of capital, including tighter bank restrictions and debanking.

I’m nervous, as an American, that foreign counties do not want to hold dollars because America we sooo mixed the reserve currency when we froze Russian assets. If they dump dollars, doesn’t that create a massive surplus and greatly devalue our money? I fear that could be catastrophic for the dollar, but I am not sure how close (or far off) we are from that idea.

I hold Bitcoin primarily, but I also have a mortgage and have family that has mortgages and hold US debt, so I am still concerned.

Thoughts?

Damn…Snoop wearing a blinged out Ledger last night…

If bitcoin didn’t exist, I’d buy gold. But it does exist.

$28,500. We meet again.

Can we make the shorts pay at $28,500 and $30,000 this time?

Saifdean now on #Nostr. Give him a follow

Sell your #doge and buy #Bitcoin. Thank me later 😁

Download wallet of satoshi and link the wallet to your account too…then people can zap you Bitcoin for your ideas and posts.

There’s certain people that will argue anything and miss the entire point. You my friend are one of those people.

I’m sure no developer at Twitter bought doge before this went live. I’m sure no insider trading went on..

Promoting an unregistered security token. I’m sure this will end well 😬