Avatar
hodlbod
97c70a44366a6535c145b333f973ea86dfdc2d7a99da618c40c64705ad98e322
Christian Bitcoiner and developer of coracle.social. Learn more at info.coracle.social. If you can't tell the difference between me and a scammer, use a nostr client with web of trust support.

nevent1qqsgy9dx555zt0ffqf9ktylhe5cnxzl3zfq0nf3zyap0yeszfj8u7lspzdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ukzcnvv5hx7un8qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyfhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yt3k8quzummjvudcvrh5

This is obviously a Christian perspective, but the ancient gods were demonic entities seeking the destruction of their followers. We see this in the worship of Molech, in which babies were burned to death in the arms of the idol, and in 1 Kings 18 where the prophets of Baal cut themselves to call down their god. As a side note, Planned Parenthood follows in these satanic practices by killing babies and chemically castrating children.

Leviticus 19:28 connects cutting oneself with tattoos, reinforcing the intuition that the permanence of a tattoo, even if not physically damaging, is a form of self-mutilation, and that it was a common practice at the time.

Many other religious traditions associate tattoos with religious practice, including the Egyptians Picts, Maori, Celts, Native Americans, Greeks, and modern Wiccans. So even if tattoos aren't necessarily self-mutilation, they're almost certainly a religious symbol.

Moderns like to dissociate one thing from another because we don't believe in a created order. But if there's such a thing as symbolic meaning, these different things can't be disentangled so easily. While most modern tattoos seem innocuous, it's also very common for people to get a tattoo when they experience a loss, or struggle with depression or suicidal thoughts, almost as if a permanent physical image has metaphysical implications.

Honestly an improvement, look at all those cool lakes

Replying to Free Speech

Hi fiatjaf, we have implemented a beta version of the onboarding idea for groups at https://manyworlds.social . A new user can sign up, and they go straight to Groups to choose their interests and then choose groups and are immediately taken to their feed. This is the groups API implemented on a Coracle install, but it can be easily implemented into the login flow of any client. We bypass choose relays and other steps to get a new user straight to an interesting feed as quickly as possible. I will upload the API to Git a bit later. I saw that nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft had a concept of using a vending machine which would be better than an API, so we will work on that after we work out some kinks to the Groups front end. We should have the front end available in a few hours. People will be able to create groups and add users. #onboarding #grownostr nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn

Interesting, I like the idea but groups should be more transparent, I have no idea what it is I'm following on that screen

Replying to Avatar ⚡️🌱🌙

I agree 💯, I’m advocating topographic discovery besides other things.

I am have data Jan gave me in neo4j, initially so that I can explore the structure and visuals. I intend to scoop more recent data and publish a graph of the network including relays and probably some pubkeys with large followings.

Later I hope to replace neo4j with memgraph and publish a much broader range of pubkey plus note traffic.

Will be using knowstr.io which I bought yesterday for the graph, also sitting on nostrmarketplace.com hd a few ideas for that including simply listing paid relays and some performance data, but I’m opposed to doing that at the moment as I’m worried about artificially kettling waves of users into a handful of big relays.

I would prefer an organic fabric, even with relays spawning and dying.

Relay costs are an issue and at the moment there is probably vastly more relay capacity than the network requires, especially at the edges. Lots of relays are under utilised.

Load balancing and revenue sharing might be viable but… how to do that without gaining control? Again, I would prefer organic fabric.

nostr needs a commercial solution for the back end. Bitcoin has this, nostr does not.

#note: this is only a late night side project for me. Not full time. More like 5-8 hours a week in a good week. I’m very much following nostr devs and thinking about stuff. I think nostr is very much pre-dawn with high turnover of devs and projects, but it continues to refine. I’m investing time now so that I’m engaged when it matters.

Awesome, I look forward to what you come up with

Yes, a lot, but graph visualization is not something I'm very good at, and I know very little about graph analysis. But it's one of those side projects that one of these days I'm just going to throw together.

Relay de-commidification. Relays should have specific content or be intended for a target audience if they want to be profitable. The name gets part of the way there, and some clients show relay descriptions, but yes, a relay marketplace or social graph analysis (find the relays your friends are on, like we have for the lightning network) are needed.

I'm tolerant of many things, the Skeptic's Annotated Bible is not one of those things.

Yo dog, I heard you like tanel

That's what those little warts are for

This ignores millennia of Christian thought that addresses exactly these problems. You think we're unaware of these questions? It's honestly insulting.

In brief,

1. Genesis is poetry, not scientific literature, inconsistency is often intentional and for a particular literary purpose (read Through New Eyes for details, chiasms often play a part). Old vs young earth is a valid debate, but both are consistent with the Biblical narrative because it features a transcendent God who is not bound by the laws of nature.

2. Science is often wrong (at best it's a method of inquiry, not a set of doctrines). Estimates about the age of the earth depend on the doctrine of uniformitarianism which Genesis explicitly denies. Likewise, the doctrine of evolution is just that, a doctrine.

Blink's approach sounds really interesting