"You actually mentioned in another a podcast, via negativa, you know the removal of the superfluous elements, admodum. What are those superfluous elements that need to get removed?
"Well, we just talked about a couple of them. I'm going to give you my bias now. I think many of the things that we do in neurosurgery, absolutely superfluous. For example, I think we do way too much spine surgery for degenerative conditions. I don't want to just pick on my own profession.
"Let's pick up on let's say, breast surgeons. I think the amount of mammograms that we do is ridiculous.
"Let's talk about the gastroenterologists. The way we screen colon cancer absolutely preposterous.
"Pediatricians, in the way they use vaccines and antibiotics. Psychotic.
"Let's talk about internal medicine. The use of statins on LDL cholesterol is probably the biggest mistake centralized medicine has ever made. But yet we still have people out there telling you you need to lower your LDL cholesterol, even though it's blatantly obvious in the literature that people that have the highest LDL cholesterol do the best and live the longest.
"So those are some of the big ideas. But I don't want anybody to think, because I just gave you a bunch of allopathic ones. There's plenty on the functional side. I can promise you these functional guys are not going to like Uncle Jack's program. Because if you think it's wise for a patient to spend $20,000–$30,000 doing labs that lead to no good outcomes for them. If they still have their hypothyroidism, or their mitochondrial function still blows, guess what? You, you need to pay the penalty, not the patient. They may have paid you $20,000, but guess what? You need to change your template because what you believe needs to come under scrutiny. Why? Because it goes to the bottom issue.
"What is the return on equity for the money spent? If we want a good system of healthcare, we need results. That's what proof of work really means, Ted." — Dr. Jack Kruse with Dr. Ted Achacoso @ 36:44–39:02 https://youtu.be/OJaR2XgTmPI&t=2204
"For example, the CDC and the FDA just announced that, 'Oh, let's give people more boosters.' I mean after looking at the aftermarket data, anybody who says, 'Let's give them more boosters,' they need to have their head examined. That would be the stupidest thing you could ever do. Why? Because they didn't work the first time, and they're certainly not going to work again.
"But you have to realize incentives dictate the outcomes. You know, the CDC and the FDA, these are people who are incentivized for big pharma. So of course they're going to tell you that.
"But the problem is the public doesn't look at the CDC or the FDA the way you and I do. We know what they are. They are levers that control the centralized paradigm.
"I mean the simple thing to do in a country like the United States is I would just tell people, 'Do not comply with anything the CDC or the FDA says.' In fact, I would tell you to do exactly the opposite, because that's exactly what they deserve. Their information has been so bad, for so long, on so many different things. Let me give you an analogy. I think you'll probably chuckle at this.
"So I was in a foreign country not that long ago, in front of group of very influential people, and I made the case, the very provocative story, that if I was to tell you that your health would be better by being under the care of the Colombian cartel for cocaine, versus the CDC or FDA, would you believe it?
"Of course, everybody in the crowd just got a big smile on their face like you did, and they laughed and this and that. Well they stopped laughing, Ted, after the next slide that showed up that showed how many people died of cocaine and fentanyl deaths in the last three years, compared to how many people died from covid and from covid vaccinations. And guess what? Everybody stopped laughing then.
"So when I told them the initial premise that I made to you, it sounded preposterous. Why? I understood. But you know what people don't understand about decentralization?
"Just put some sunshine on the data, on the facts. All of a sudden people will be able to make their own decision. Because guess what?
"If you sit down with me and you're my patient in the operatory, and I tell you this story, and I show you that slide that I showed them, all of a sudden you begin to realize well if we made this big a mistake with that, what kind of mistake are we making with statins? What kind of mistake are we making with stents? What kind of mistake are we making with, I don't know, CABG versus non-operative treatment? What kind of mistake are we making with fusions? And this is the point, Ted.
"The point is the decentralized perspective has never been given a chance to show its power. OK?" —Dr. Jack Kruse with Dr. Ted Achacoso @ 01:31:07–01:34:01 https://youtu.be/OJaR2XgTmPI&t=5467
Dr. Ted Achacoso: "Say I am a patient. […] I go to you, and it's decentralized medicine for a particular disease, choose your favorite one as an example. Walk me through how a decentralized medicine system would work.
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Well, let's take the simplest one […] Let's think about hypertension.
"Hypertension is a huge problem. Most of us know the reason why it's a big issue, because it can lead to bad medical outcomes that are very, very expensive. And dealing with someone's blood pressure is simple. […]
"The first thing we have to do is define what a high and low blood pressure would be for the patient's age. And I would like to say haplotype, because in my practice we'd tie it to their haplotype, their latitude. Are they mismatched?
"For example, […] if a guy from Somalia comes into my clinic in Toronto, that guy's not getting medication. OK?
"Now if it's a guy from Nairobi who's coming to see me in my clinic in Nairobi, and he has high blood pressure, and his Vitamin D level is really good, I'm probably gonna default to medication on him sooner than the other guy.
"You understand that nuance. But guess what? The people who listen to this who are not doctors say, 'I don't understand what Jacks just said.' This is the whole point of my system. Doctors will begin to understand what's really important.
"The single most important thing for high blood pressure should be education that's done in the operatory.
"For example, I would sit down that guy in Toronto who's from Somalia and make him watch the TED Talk of Dr Richard Weller from 10 years ago. He's a dermatologist that basically said, 'It seems like most of the people in Edinburgh are dying of problems related to hypertension because they don't have enough nitric oxide production, because they don't get enough sun, because we live at the 59th latitude.'
"So my discussion with the patient would start right away. 'Tell me what you do. Oh, you're an IT worker. OK. Tell me about your day.'
"In other words, you're doing an environmental biohack on them as part of their demographics, something that never gets done in a centralized system or even a functional medicine system.
"'Well, tell me how long you spend under blue light and around non-native EMF. OK, so that explains why your vitamin D is 13, and your blood pressure today was 159 over 87.'
"'I will tell you what I think we need to do first. Let's mitigate your environment as best we can. We'll get you some blue blockers. We'll have you wear turtlenecks, cover your body all over. And I'm going to ask you to go out and see the sunrise every day. I'm going to ask you to try to ground. And I'm going to have you try to get at least an hour of sun on 80% of your skin. I want you to be like Uncle Jack is right now. And then I'd like to see you back in one month to see what your blood pressure is.'
"I'd also give them a blood pressure cuff, teach them how to do their blood pressure at home, because I'd want them, in a book, to write down for me what the trend is, and how much time they spent in the sun. I'd introduce them to the vitamin D app that Michael Holick has. I'd explain how to use that in their latitude.
"And then they'd come back and see me in a month. If the blood pressure showed a good trend, then I would tighten up the environment more. If they did everything that they were supposed to do, then I would consider a first generation pharmacotherapeutics for that patient." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Dr. Ted Achacoso @ 57:41–01:02:01 https://youtu.be/OJaR2XgTmPI&t=3461
"Most people don't know that one of the most controversial drugs out of covid, which is hydroxychloroquine, is actually a derivative of methylene blue. You know what that means?
"The methylene blue could have been used to treat covid very successfully. Now methylene blue is pretty damn cheap. Now here's the interesting part.
"The reason that it couldn't happen in the United States in the centralized system was because the system that was built by that law in 1980, the one in 1986, and the subsequent laws that were passed and adjudicated by guys like Fauci and Collins, was you could not have an Emergency Use Authorization for any vaccine if another drug was found to be successful at treating that disease.
"And realize that that's the reason why 'The Science,' the centralized science, was used to block guys like me and you from telling people, 'Hey, you might want to try this, instead of doing this.'
"See that's a decision, Ted, that needs to happen in your operatory, in my operatory, with me and the patient. And you know what? The skin in the game for me and you is if we're fucking wrong, somebody's going to come after us." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Dr. Ted Achacoso @ 55:18–56:37 https://youtu.be/OJaR2XgTmPI&t=3318
Ulcers, Leaky Gut, Getting Fat, Autism, Cancer
Dr. Jack Kruse: "When I was in medical school, we used to do vagotomies on people for people who had ulcers. We used to think this was a good idea to go in and cut their vagus nerve.
"Then Barry Marshall comes along and says, 'OK, I think it's Helicobactor. I'm gonna prove it.' He looked for an animal model to use. He couldn't use monkeys or gorillas. Why? Because the closest relatives to us have a different gut organization than we have. So what did he have to do to prove it? He had to drink the fucking Helicobacter himself and then scope himself while he did this. [...] He couldn't use a chimp or a gorilla to do this because they don't have the same gap junctions in their gut that we do.
"Turns out humans have a leaky gut by design. Why? Because we're designed to absorb tons of viruses that are in seawater. That's the difference between us and chimps.
"It turns out that those viral elements that we got from seawater played a massive role in encephalization of our brain. That's the reason why we have two frontal lobes and gorillas and chimps don't. It's also the reason why when a human baby is born it's fat as shit, has an immature brain. When a chimp and a gorilla have almost a fully-formed brain and they look like an anorexic individual. Because they don't need the fat to develop the brain. That brings then a new point.
"Is that the reason why people are getting fat in different parts of the world today? Is there something that's causing a cognitive devolution? Is the body reacting like the cancer cell, is going back to a primitive form? We call that atavism.
"I'm going to tell you that to me is the key to autism. That's exactly what's happening there.
"The same thing that's happening in Levin's lab that he's learning about cancer, where there's changes in gap junctions, is the same thing that happens with neuronal migrations.
"Cells, just as I told you DNA has a history of all life, so do cells. Pay attention to what cells do.
"Remember what Becker found, Cameron. He found that in salamanders, in mammals, that red blood cells have the capability to dedifferentiate into pluripotential stem cells by using using weak electromagnetic signals. Then hard stop again.
"Think about what Gurwitsch found in the onion root experiment, that you cannot pass through mitosis unless you have extreme low frequency UV light. You're learning some of the key metrics. These are like the beacons, the signposts.
"So I would tell you the link to biophotons, the link to ROS signal, is tied to the presence or loss of the gap junctions. That brings directly the idea of AMO physics to the cell.
"And it turns out this is the reason why in cancer cells, also size and shape changes, also completely correlate to thermodynamics. It also make sense why mitochondria look the way they do in different diseases. But people are not putting those things together.
"Remember, there's there's micropores on the inner and outer mitochondrial membrane that are acting just the way the cells in Levin's lab are working. But remember, the mitochondria itself is a bacteria. it's not a eukaryote. So you have to begin to realize that how that mitochondria operates within a eukaryotic cell is not going to look the same as a eukaryotic cell that Levin is working you know, with cancer.
"The key thing is, I think what he's focused in on is the morphogenetics. I think he's between Becker and probably Rupert Sheldrake, if you want to know the truth."
Cameron Borg: "I couldn't agree more."
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Yeah. I think that's where he is, and I think he's looking for things that are going to get him to the next level." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Cameron Borg @ 01:36:18–01:40:47 https://youtu.be/2Xfa_V30tR0&t=5778
Carrie Bennett: "I love what you say about part of the healing the nervous system is you have to have that and educate yourself. I feel the same way about someone who's healing their body.
"My goal is not to give you a protocol that you just do blindly. My goal is for you to actually understand and start to embrace some science that, yeah the words might be a little confusing at first. But once you start to understand it, and once my clients start to recognize the physiological reasoning behind these recommendations, that is the glue that really sticks with their behavioral changes."
Irene Lyon: "Yes, and I think it has to do with our higher brain wanting information and wanting to figure things out. We are problem solvers as humans whether we like it or not.
"And I did see in fitness and in the medical health world just being given a pamphlet and say, 'It's saying you have to do this,' it just doesn't create that glue with the person to stick and for them to keep perpetuating that lifestyle shift." —Carrie Bennett with Irene Lyon @ 12:31–13:35 https://youtu.be/_rGxeExQYjs&t=751
"You know what DNA looks like, because you've seen it in books, you've seen the X-ray crystallography of Rosalyn Franklin, you've seen what Watson and Crick have said. We now know that opticogenetics can change how DNA works. In other words, when you shine different lights on DNA it does different shit. Guess what? Same thing is true when we put it in a different magnetosphere. It reacts differently.
"The thing is we don't understand all the variables yet. But we know that it's an electromagnetic antenna. We know that it's hydrated. It can't work without water. And we know that the type of water that's around DNA changes the function of what DNA does.
"So if you don't think that when sunlight comes out and changes the electrical permittivity, that that's basically called the coherence, where the dielectric constant in water goes from 78 to 160. If you don't think that every single change there means that DNA has a different capability then you don't understand life. Because that's exactly what's going on. When it goes from 78 to 88, this part of life is possible. When it goes from 88 to 108, this becomes possible. I think in all of those changes you will find every single animal on this planet operates in different octaves of what is possible.
"And I believe that all of life on Earth, the DNA that's in us, since we're the last of life that's evolved, in terms of being complex, everything that was present in archaea and bacteria 3.8 billion years ago is present in us right now.
"In other words, the life that they experience then is magnetically and electrically stored in us. In other words, mother nature doesn't let any opportunity to learn go by the wayside. And that's what makes life really amazing, because no matter what she faces, she's trying to shuffle that deck and figure out what she needs to do to survive.
"That's actually the story that's in Jurassic Park. It's the story that's in quantum biology. it's the story in every extinction event.
"Every extinction event always has the seed of creation in it. It's even the story that's in our holy books, whether it be the great flood or the story of Adam and Eve, however you want to look at. There is a modicum of truth to all the parables that are there of how this story links there.
"I always like to take people back to my favorite one, which is in the beginning of Genesis, because that affects a lot of religions. Let there be light. Yeah OK, God told you it's a big story about light. But you know what He didn't tell you?
"He didn't tell you the recipe. that's what we're here to figure out. That's what Levin's doing. That's what Becker did. I'm putting my two cents in, Montagnier put his two cents in, you're putting your two cents in by doing a podcast like this. Prigogine, the same way.
"And what are we trying to do? We're trying to parse the onion so that we have a greater understanding, and we don't make the mistakes that people have made." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Cameron Borg @ 01:29:48–01:33:22 https://youtu.be/2Xfa_V30tR0&t=5388
Irene Lyon: "So let's dig apart this sunrise thing a little bit. [...] What is that morning light doing? What is that morning light? And what is going on in our brain and nervous system when it actually goes into the eyes?"
Carrie Bennett: "It's a beautiful pathway. It's really, really crazy to think about light as containing information that our body uses. But we've all seen it. Anytime you've shone light through a prism and you see the different colors, that's different what are called wavelengths of light.
"A wavelength of light is just information, the color contains information. So in that light are little packets of light called photons. And when we're outside, nature laid this out beautifully, because it doesn't stay the same. The colors are not the same all the time. From sunrise to sunset they shift and they vary in a very predictable way.
"What you have at sunrise is you actually don't have very much of the blue. You don't have any ultraviolet, none of those colors of light, none of the UV light. At sunrise, it's really heavy in the red and infrared actually. That's a portion of light that we can't even see. But it's heavy in the red and the infrared. And that kind of is a calming, anyone who's been outside at dawn, it's very calming.
"Those soothing colors of light are what really preps the body then to wake up to the more energizing colors of light that come a little bit later. Then as soon as the sun breaks the horizon, you get a much more intense jolt of blue light.
"But it's this perfect blend of red and blue that actually gets captured by the backs of my eyes. I've got like little catcher's mitts for photons in the backs of my eyes. They're just waiting to suck this light in.
"Depending on the blend that gets caught, how much blue and how much red, it can communicate to this clock in my brain, called the suprachiasmatic nucleus, and my whole body knows then exactly what time of day it is.
"Then as the colors shift and change, you get the blue, you get the violet, indigo violet, ultraviolet colors, that's when the sun's at the high point of the sky. You've got all the colors, and then they predictably go away. The colors go away until at sunset, it really mirrors what you're receiving at dawn.
"All living creatures have been entrained to this beautiful change of colors in the form of the wavelengths of light from sunrise to sunset. And then we've been able to optimize our biological function, decide when to do different tasks based on what light frequencies are there." —Carrie Bennett with Irene Lyon @ 21:51–25:04 https://youtu.be/_rGxeExQYjs&t=1312
Cameron Borg: "I wanted to start by asking about mate selection and olfaction. A couple of years ago there was a paper published suggesting that repeated miscarriages were related to olfactory perception, particularly of male odor in the brain. And I've been thinking for several years now that the use of deodorants and perfumes, and just generally not being able to smell one another's actual scent is really impacting the way that we interact with others, particularly those we see as potential mates. I wanted to ask you your thoughts on this, and how important olfaction is in the way that we interact with one another."
Dr. Jack Kruse: "[…] In us, meaning humans, we have six layers of cortex in most places in our brain. But it turns out right where the olfactory cortex is there's only three. It's the oldest part of our brain. […] Between all of our senses, the five senses (actually I'm going to tell you it's six, because mitochondria is another one), we have melanin present there. Most people don't know that there's olfactory melanosomes that do that.
"The way sex selection or mate selection really works, you're designed to smell someone else's immune system. OK? So if you use perfumes, if you use deodorants, if you use any odoriferants at all then you begin to realize that it creates an interesting problem. […]
"When you're dealing with three-layer cortex, it turns out the ROS signal is really important, because that's actually what creates the biophoton release in cells. So effectively, what you're doing in three-layer cortex is you are really sampling someone else's electromagnetic footprint to see if they're compatible, not only with your biology, it's not so much a mitochondrial story, it's actually really a story is do our immune system really work.
"And this story goes back so far, especially in humans. Most people don't know that the genes that actually form the MHC complex, and formed the genes that actually formed our brain, called Sonic hedgehog, that controls migration, they all lead back to these immune-mediated problems.
"Meaning that your immune system allows you to pick the right person. Because what is the goal of evolution or nature? It's to make sure that the offspring is viable.
"Back in the early days of mammals, there was no issues. There was no electromagnetic pollution to get involved, so this was not really an issue. It turned out that the ROS signal (versus the biophotons) was much more important.
"And the ROS signal, this should make sense to you, because T and B cells use like superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and the Fenton's reaction to create a massive amplification of the system.
"So when you're able to smell someone that actually is additive to your immunity, that actually is going to drive a lot of your biologic selection.
"Your presupposition that when we get involved in masking our sense, is there an issue, the answer is yes. And this is probably some of the oldest quantum biology that's in us. […]
"It turns out these T cells, when they get activated, we have massive amplifications of ROS to actually fuel how the T and the B cells actually work in natural immunity. […]
"When you layer this on with Nick Lane's work, you begin to understand this is why dogs and cats smell each other's butts. You actually see remnants of this in us. I would tell you it's the reason we kiss and it's the reason why we perform oral sex, for the exact same reason. You are actually getting feedback on this. I've actually told some of my members if you enjoy kissing and you enjoy oral sex, it actually tells you something about the person that you're with. If you do not, it also tells you something." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Cameron Borg @ 01:08–09:15 https://youtu.be/2Xfa_V30tR0&t=68
Irene Lyon: "I have a question about infrared. […] So I know a lot of people have talked about infrared saunas. […] Is it the same kind of light that's coming from the sun?
Carrie Bennett: "Not necessarily. So there's different wavelengths of infrared. There's infrared, near infrared, middle infrared, far infrared. You'll sometimes hear that associated with saunas, it's like, 'far-infrared sauna.' Or these red light panels that are becoming really popular, 'near-infrared panels.'
"The sun contains all of them. And some forms of infrared we feel as heat. Some forms of infrared we don't feel as heat.
"That being said though, in general, infrared isn't ever doing anything for our circadian rhythm. It's always beneficial as long as it's during a time when infrared would be available in our environment, so dawn till dusk.
"You want to hop in that sauna? Go for it. I don't really worry about you timing that in a circadian way. Red light therapy panel, same thing." —Carrie Bennett with Irene Lyon @ 26:38–27:51 https://youtu.be/_rGxeExQYjs&t=1598
Cameron Borg: "I want to ask you one last question before my head explodes. This is about deuterium dynamics. […] is having a higher D:H ratio when living on the equator, does that serve a benefit? […]
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Yeah, I think this a great question. I do believe that you need higher deuterium levels at the equator. The reason why is that offsets the electromagnetic radiation that you're getting from the sun, because it's extremely strong there.
"Just remember the lesson from physics. Where do they use heavy water? They use it in nuclear reactors. OK? Why do they use it in nuclear reactors? Because it turns out deuterium-enriched water helps control chemistry that happens at high levels. It's exactly what life is telling you on earth as well.
"The flip to that is since most humans on the planet have uncoupled haplotypes, […] they have different metrics. So even when they migrate to the equator, do they need to do something different?
"Which is one of the mind-boggling things that I always hear. People are like, 'Oh, when I go to El Salvador I need to go buy deuterium-depleted water." And I'm like, 'Why? Why don't you just drink coconut water?' […]
"When I say it to them, I think they're stunned, because they always make the assumption that life should always use deutereum-depleted water, because that's what's good in cancer.
"Well, if you don't have cancer, you live at the equator, why would you make the assumption that deuterium depletion really matters?" —Dr. Jack Kruse with Cameron Borg @ 02:00:06–02:02:08 https://youtu.be/2Xfa_V30tR0&t=7206
"What did [Robert O] Becker really find? This DC electric current in us, it takes red blood cells and dedifferentiates them into stem cells.
"Now you guys believe today, even right now, that stem cells are like in us, and then they magically show up and replace things in our body. It turns out that's not how it happens at all. This is the reason why guys that are giving you stem cells are the biggest fucking scammers on the planet. They don't know what Becker's work is.
"Why is the red blood cell the key to this story? Because it has no mitochondria. That means there's no electric potential in a red blood cell. Why is that a key part of this story? Because Becker found that the current to dedifferentiate red blood cells is 1,000th of one millionth of an ampere of current, meaning it is the most fucking small thing in the world you could ever imagine. And the biochemical paradigm that still exists today. . . this is in the 1960s he finds this. They couldn't fucking wrap their head around this.
"So what was Becker's next logical extension? Well if a small little current does this in our body, what does this mean for all the things that are plugged into the AC power grid? How is that impacting our ability to heal? How is that impacting diabetes? How is that impacting limb regeneration or bone regeneration? He was asking the biggest questions that you now hear guys like Bobby Kennedy talk about.
"Well dude, this is what I've been talking about for 20 years. I kept my focus in on his work.
"So when you begin to realize why darkness at night's a big deal, soon as you put a light on that changes the voltages and the currents tremendously in your body. So you literally looking at a screen ruins that DC current for regeneration at night. Like game, set, and match. It's over, based on Becker's work.
"But what also does it mean? It means when we have sunlight, like you behind me, this is how you recharge the battery." —Dr. Jack Kruse on the Bulwarg Disclosure Podcast @ 37:50–40:00 https://youtu.be/vapEVjTK7mE&t=2270
"And then when they decided to cancel light bulbs, and they did it under the moniker that you hear from the World Economic Forum, 'Oh, we need to do it to save energy for the CO2 footprint.' That is total bullshit.
"Turns out that those lights are the biggest endocrine disruptors out there.
"When you hear people like Bobby Kennedy and the Means brother and sister talk the shit they talk, it drives me fucking crazy. The reason I get crazy about it: you blame fucking food for what light causes, you never solve the original fucking problem. That is my problem with them. And here's the irony.
"All these forever chemicals, none of them realize that the answer is already in centralized science. There's a guy named Mourou that won the Nobel Prize for something called chirped frequencies, that you can actually take really strong light, monochromatic light, and you can get rid of fucking forever chemicals.
"So guess what. If you want to talk about that shit, great. We already know how to fix it. But guess what fixes it again: fucking light. We're back to the light story. It needs to stay on the light story, and it doesn't need to go to the food story.
"The food story is fucking superfluous. It drives me fucking crazy when people want to talk about it, because the one thing that is very crystal clear: nobody in MKUltra and nobody in the Brain Health Initiative is using food to fucking change people in the way they think. Yeah it does make you sick, but it's not the fucking key story.
"The fact that these Means people show up with Bobby leads me to believe that this is another psyops from big tobacco, big food. […]
"We all fucking know the food in the United States is a problem. But it's not the magnitude of the problem that these people want to believe. And when they push this narrative, dude it makes me really crazy. And then when you see the link of this brother and sister tandem to the same universities that are tied to this story at ARPANET and MKUltra. And you find out she didn't finish her residency." —Dr. Jack Kruse on the Bulwarg Disclosure Podcast @ 01:15:04–01:17:14 https://youtu.be/vapEVjTK7mE&t=4504
"Technologist, the transhumanists, want you to believe right now that artificial intelligence is the new great craze that's out there. It's not. If you ask any technologist out there, Joe, you have them on your show here, ask them, 'What's the target of AI?' You know what you're going to get when you ask him that question? Crickets.
"You know what the target of AI is for biology? It's our children. Children are artificial intelligence for us. They take their father's sperm, their mother's egg with the mitochondrial DNA, and they make an alien. You're not like your mother. You're not like your father. There's lots of things that are kind of the same, but you're different. And there's a lesson there for you to understand.
"It turns out that when a baby is born, a human baby is born, remember it's pretty much useless. It doesn't talk. It needs help to shit, to eat, everything else.
"And part of the reason for that is the key program in us that has to be turned on is something called the leptin-melanocortin pathway. It's why every baby is born with blue eyes, tons of fat, and usually pretty pale skinned, no matter what the race is. If you've ever seen an African-American baby born, they look pale as fuck.
"The reason why is they're designed to be in the sun. […] Salvadorian people, when they have babies, they bring the baby out in the sun almost immediately. Because guess what? That's what turns the program on.
"And what did I say to you before about longevity? That's exactly the best way to do it, because what are you doing? You're turning that system on. That system is called the POMC system, stands for a gene in us that humans have. . ." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Joe Burnett @ 36:56–38:46 https://youtu.be/jtMu-KFyKxM&t=2216
"Mitochondrial biology tells us that the visible spectrum of sunlight is really important. So the more of that you get, the better it goes. There's been about six meta-analysis in centralized medicine that show longevity is a function of how much time you spend in sunlight.
"I will tell you the only thing that they miss, is that it's not just how much time you spend in the sunlight, but it's also how dark your nights are.
"In other words, remember I told you that the decentralized law for biology is that there's no central controller. So you have to do a good job, like I'm doing now being outside of my house in El Salvador.
"But when the night time comes here at 06:30, we turn all the lights off. Like there's no TV. We're not doing anything crazy. It doesn't mean you can't have fun. You can still go out and do different things, but you need to protect yourself then do it. Protect your skin. Wear a lot of clothing then, wear blue blocking glasses. Then you can still go out and have a beer with your buddies you know here and there, or go out and pick up chicks. Whatever you want to do. It doesn't matter. But be smart about how you use time.
"Most people, I think, have got the wrong opinion of Uncle Jack, where they think I'm not a technologist. No. I don't like technology because I think we abuse it, and I think your generation's been told there's no downside to it.
"What I'm telling you is I want you to use it wisely, use it smartly. I don't want you to be Hal Finney. Hal Finney, Paul Allen and Steve Jobs all died from an unabated use of technology. Every single one of them. That's their story.
"Yes, they may have done great things. But if you actually go and read Steve Jobs biography done by Walter Isaacson, what does he say in there? He says directly in there that, 'I would never let my kids use my own technology.' Think about that for a minute." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Joe Burnett @ 35:07–36:54 https://youtu.be/jtMu-KFyKxM&t=2107
"Isn't hash rate a function of time? Absolutely it is. I mean, I would tell you that hash rate is the metabolic health of the bitcoin network that correlates to thyroid hormone […] free T3 and the TSH level in a person. […]
"Within the bitcoin algorithm you have a hash rate. You have a proof of work mechanism. What else should we give Adam Back some credit for? What's the proof of work mechanism in nature?
"If you look behind me that tree, the conacaste, there's chlorophyll in it. Chlorophyll is a nitride cage filled with a magnesium atom. […] That takes the sun, turns its energy into the hardness of a tree or the leaves. That's also a time machine. […]
"Inside of Joe right now, if he was with me here in El Salvador, if I stuck a needle in his arm to draw some blood work on him, that red blood is hemoglobin. You know that hemoglobin is also a nitride cage? Looks exactly like chlorophyll. But you know what the difference is? In the middle of it you got an iron atom. […] It has a few more electrons than magnesium.
"Why is this a big deal? Because the same thing that happens in chlorophyll happens in Joe, happens in Jack.
"And here's the irony. Go back to that guy we talked about earlier, Einstein. He won the Nobel prize with the photoelectric effect. You know what that means? The only way you can deliver light to different tissues in that tree or me is through the electrons that you collect. […]
"That tree behind me can live for four-, five-, six-, seven-hundred years. We can't, but it can. Why? Because it's always connected to the sun and the roots are in the ground 100% of the time.
"It doesn't have to listen to a dermatologist to tell it to stay out of the sun. It doesn't have to listen to an opthalmologist tell you to wear sunglasses. It doesn't have to listen to any stupid primary care doctors tell you you should put sunscreen on your kids. No. You shouldn't do any of those things.
"Because if you do those things then you should buy Ethereum or stay in fiat money, and go live in a 5G city and just say, 'Fuck it. I don't care.'
"But when you care about your time, you're going to come to a place like this where we have all those beautiful things around us, and we also have decentralized money. It's legal tender here because of a guy that you know, Jack Mallers." —Dr. Jack Kruse with Joe Burnett @ 26:03—29:45 https://youtu.be/jtMu-KFyKxM&t=1563
Giving Thanks
"There's so many ways that we can actually structure our water. It doesn't have to get super fancy. Or if you want to, you can spend a heck of a lot of money as well. […] You can get it without spending money. […]
"The way I test a lot of my stuff […] I use Veda's technique. […] Veda Austin has a water crystallography technique where you essentially flash freeze the water and it shows, on a grander scale, because everything is fractal, […] whether the water organizes itself into structures and patterns, or whether it just kind of looks amorphous, which would be unstructured, typically.
"So yeah, the Aǹalemma Wand will structure water. right? It will form these beautiful ferns and hexagons, that's happy water, that's structured water. But I've done the same thing by taking my glass of reverse osmosis, remineralized water and holding it to my heart and thinking happy thoughts into the water, as weird as that sounds. Same thing. Right? I put that water, I flash freeze, it looks the same.
"Tap water looks UGLY when you freeze it in comparison. […] And so you can actually take tap water, the same sample essentially, and take one and think happy thoughts, the other one you just freeze it, straight up, and you'll see the same sample of water will have different structure, based on whether you've provided the loving energy and intention, compassion, gratitude, whatever feeling you might want.
"But it's why I think, Max, that every culture that I know of from history's past has had a habit of prayer or gratitude prior to a meal. Giving thanks, right? And giving thanks, is it just to give thanks, or did it actually somehow change the energetic quality of what they were about to consume? I think through understanding water, it actually changed the energetic qualities." —Carrie Bennett with nostr:npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 01:02:38–01:04:59 https://youtu.be/YC9-p5KAQDY&t=3758
Max Gulhane MD: "You mentioned structuring. How can we get the benefits of structuring? Are there specifical clinical evidence of benefit of structuring your water? Or is it an inferred, kind of deduced, benefit?"
Carrie Bennett: "Oh no, there's clinical research. I mean drinking structured water has shown improvements on HRV, on blood sugar regulation. Because of HRV, you can imagine it's also been implicated in improvements in anxiety and depression as well. […] There is probably at least half a dozen good articles that I've read on structured water, in both human health, and then an additional amount of articles on structured water in things like animals and plants.
"I like to look into that as well, because plants and animals don't necessarily know, 'Oh, this water is structured, so it's going to give me a health benefit.' Right? So if there's been poorly-controlled human experiments then you can see that. Actually there's a lot of structured water evidence in the plant and animal literature to indicate better, bigger crop yield, healthier size of various livestock. Chickens, their eggs, more nutrient density. I mean there's a lot of different things that have been studied in that case.
"So there is research behind it. But just also I mean just anecdotally, or just viscerally, if water can hold information, which it can, and if you want we can talk about that. Maybe we'll save that for another time. But water can hold information. So if water can hold information, I want it to hold information that is of benefit to my body. Because literally, if it's not going to have good quality structure to it, it's not necessarily going to be helping to put my body in a thriving state anymore. It can actually go against it. One of my colleagues, Jenn (?), describes tap water as traumatized. Literally, not only are you getting all the toxins from it, but the structure is such that it is really ugly looking water, when you look at it from that molecular level.
"So you want water to have structure, too. Because it's not just that there's proven scientific health benefits that it has, but the water is an antenna for energy and information. What I drink, in the same way that I don't want to put garbage on my body, in terms of toxic personal care products, that's very similar, in my opinion, to water that doesn't have structure to it.
"Are we going to drink it, and is it gonna is it going to kill us? No, no. But can we choose a better quality substance that gives us actually more energy and vitality? Absolutely. And that's what structured water does." —Carrie Bennett with nostr:npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 59:56–01:02:37 https://youtu.be/YC9-p5KAQDY&t=3596
Irene Lyon: "Let's talk melatonin, my dear. Give a little crash course on what that is, why it's best to probably not take the supplements, and how we want that melatonin to be released naturally during the day."
31:41
Carrie Bennett: "Yeah, it's a great question. So yes, melatonin is a hormone. And we actually make it in two places, and most people don't recognize that. We make it in our pineal gland, so deep in our brain we make it. And then we also make it inside of our cells, it's called subcellular melatonin.
"And so we think of melatonin as just the hormone that puts us to sleep. But it's actually responsible for so much repair. It's very much one of our most potent anti-aging repair hormones.
"And so if you think about it, and if we were to test someone's melatonin, […] we see the pineal melatonin […] start to rise around sunset, and then peak right in the middle of the night. And then as the sun would start to be rising above the horizon, dawn, it starts to go down again. So we have this circadian peak when we're sleeping. And that makes sense, because yes, […] that pineal melatonin puts us to sleep.
"But then it's responsible for running all of our cellular repair programs when we are asleep. Something called autophagy, which is like our internal repair, recycling programming. Apoptosis, kills off cells that don't function, don't serve us anymore. And so we need enough melatonin to not only put us to sleep but to run those programs.
"Here's why you don't necessarily want to take it. Melatonin is a hormone. I have a hard time recommending blanketly that it's always safe to supplement a hormone, because hormones work in feedback loops. They work in these beautiful systems, tightly coupled systems.
"And so the coupled system with melatonin is actually the fact that when you are outside in morning sunlight, those wavelengths that you capture in the morning through your eyes turn a chemical called tryptophan, which we think of at Thanksgiving. 'Oh, I've eaten too much tryptophan. I'm tired. Turkey. Yeah, yeah.'
"So we've got tons of tryptophan in the morning just kind of swimming in the backs of our eyes. That tryptophan, as soon as it receives the light frequency, the ultraviolet light frequency, it takes that tryptophan and it makes it into serotonin.
"So it actually sets us up to feel good, energized, focused. It sets up our brain to be productive for the day. And then that serotonin, as soon as we sense the light is waning and darkness is coming, that serotonin then gets converted into melatonin. That melatonin gets used up, broken back down, and the tryptophan gets recycled back in the morning.
"And it's this beautiful cycle. Tryptophan gets the light, becomes serotonin, feeling good, doing my thing. Day goes, day wanes, melatonin. And that's how it's meant to be.
"When you insert it just artificially here, it's really confusing to your body, because it's like, 'Well, wait. We didn't have the stores to lead up to it. How did that happen?'
"And so you're more likely to have tons of tryptophan in the morning that makes you just feel groggy as heck, gives you a hard time waking up. You have a hard time getting out of bed. You start to feel worse, especially then if you're not converting that tryptophan back to serotonin with morning sunlight, and linking the whole process together." —Carrie Bennett with Irene Lyon @ 31:21–34:53 https://youtu.be/_rGxeExQYjs&t=1883
Irene Lyon: "What's the connection there with those hormones in the evening and that blue light? And the sex hormones […] like progesterone […]"
Carrie Bennett: "I think everyone has heard of cortisol before. Right? We know it's our stress hormone. And I think everyone realizes we do get a surge of cortisol in the morning. It's meant to wake us up and energize us. So we have to have elevated cortisol in the morning.
"But before it's cortisol, it's actually the master steroid hormone called pregnenolone. So let's say, nine o'clock in the morning, the mitochondria […] make pregnenolone for us in all of our cells, but there's especially the ones that are in our sex cells.
"And that pregnenolone can become a lot of different things. So at that point of time, my body, my brain, takes a snapshot and says, 'OK. Is Carrie in a safe space to make a baby? Does she have enough body fat stored on her? Is this a time of year when food will be plentiful to feed a growing baby?' All of those things.
"And so I can funnel that pregnenolone to progesterone, to estrogen, to all the things that my body would need in order to prep, to create a baby, and grow a pregnancy.
"Or I can be in a state of, 'Wait. Carrie is in stress. She's being chased by a saber-toothed tiger. She's got a deadline at work.' And so they'll funnel a lot more of that pregnenolone into cortisol.
"And so every morning my body is making this decision for me in the morning.
"And then when ultraviolet light, the more intense frequencies of ultraviolet light appear, when the sun gets higher and higher, that actually is the off switch. That's why cortisol starts to slow down, it starts to decline.
"And that's where the other steroid hormones, the estrogen, the progesterone, the testosterone, also start to just kind of create this balance. They get regular. 'OK, Carrie has too much estrogen in here. We're gonna boot it out this way. Testosterone is low, we got to raise it up a little bit.' And so that's where the body starts to regulate those hormones.
"So picture what happens at night. When the day is waning, and all of a sudden we get that jolt of blue, and we're producing cortisol again. We're producing all of these steroid hormones again, and there's never any ultraviolet light to counter that. Which means that all of a sudden we're having the challenge of, 'I'm making the hormones, but I don't have the off switch to kind of regulate it.'
"And so what that means is, to regulate hormones, it's about just modifying your light environment. It's about getting outside key times during the day. OK. Let me get a little morning light. Let me get a little ultraviolet light. When the sun is going down let me make sure I tell my body the sun is going down, and I keep my house chill and dim and calm. Let me do what I need to do to mitigate the blue light from entering my eyes if I'm watching screens, so that you don't get that hormone surge at night.
"And you kind of get that nice sleep, your melatonin is giving you some repair, and then when you wake up and you go outside, you get the natural blue to start the process over in a healthy way again." —Carrie Bennett with Irene Lyon @ 52:03–55:14 https://youtu.be/_rGxeExQYjs&t=3123